Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
Subscription? That’s gonna be a “Nay” from me.
Wow. I never went the vinyl shopping, sample seeking route but this approach seems really useful
at $7/month (yearly subscription rate). Really impressive audio quality… I tried the screen recording
and then “Import Video” in Koala hack to see if I could get a wave file out of it and that worked but
I think it was a lower bit rate. Still… I’ve I need to pull together impressive sounding “studio” demos I could
see how this would be more like editing than composing.
You can pay 1 month.. collect samples, build your sample liberary and then cancel subscription … for 7€ pretty good deal if you ask me … if you buy individual sampla packs you pay much more
literally tracking
yah this is how I treat subs these days. I have a monthly sub budget so I can just sub, cancel right away, mark the expiry on the calendar and then milk it for what I can for a month. Especially for something like this where I am not investing time into learning a workflow.
For me personally, it's currently a nay. The sub isn't why, though. I just can't conceive of a way to fit Tracklib into my current workflow is all. 😅 But, I will say, I'm glad it's now on iOS just in case I need it. One never knows with me. 😂
Same same. I get this feeling like "what are developers thinking" but it must work right? I have to wonder though, how many outright buyers would it take to replace one subscriber?
So many trackers it's practically spyware and a subscription? Hell nay.
Hard pass because of the trackers.
You're going to charge me per month, and then make more money off of selling my contact info to third parties? Screw that.
On the other hand, iOS does give you the ability to prevent the trackers. That is ... assuming the app will still operate if they're blocked.
It's not my kinda thing anyway though. I'll stop cluttering up the conversation.
Yah and sadly big companies are driven by lawyers and accountants, so... lizard people. I wish I was joking.
It goes way beyond selling your contact info. They are building up heuristics on people to train an AI so they know human behaviour better and can therefore better exploit it. Swish!
They are looking at people in highly abstract forms and creating the allure of a cartoon like understanding of who we are as acceptable measure for living a so called fulfilled life! To the piers, my brothers and sisters! Awaken!
So yah, as for Tracklib. The people who are offering it are actually using your data to train an AI music model. I mean, duh, all of these types of services would be about doing that.
And the evil part of me says, hell yah, "back to the wall = people do crazy stuff"
Joe Rogan will become The Next King of Latenight
Also might want to use older bluetooth headphones. Seriously. The newer ones are going to do data gathering using diffusion rendering. By taking the output of the audio and what is being heard by the listener and analyzing it in real time to determine the general characteristics of physiological changes relating to culturally understood and appropriated messaging within media at large.
Then... the process of inversion happens where people want headwear (or headdresses as they will be known / tribal callback) to not just gather data but to send it en masse to the psychy!
Woooshwooooshwoooosh!
Apple claims otherwise...
https://support.apple.com/en-us/102420
Here's an excerpt - but the whole support article is well worth reading...
And then there is always the question though of does a person want to support/fund companies that engage in such things to begin with.
$0.99 for the first month… cancel anytime. Choosing this option sets the month rate at $15 but if it’s something you can’t live without cancel and upgrade with the $80/year option ($6.67/month). Subscriptions are the only way a developer can predict
quarter over quarter revenue. Too many developers sell at release and then have to create a new product to meet payroll…
we see them riding off into the night on a regular basis never to be seen again.
@Michael seems to have a solid approach to generating income somewhat predictably by selling upgrades to re-visit the value of the app.
Regarding all the surveillance issues… that’s the Enshittification Pattern of Internet based services as articulated by Cory Docterow:
https://craphound.com/news/2025/02/26/with-great-power-came-no-responsibility-how-enshittification-conquered-the-21st-century-and-how-we-can-overthrow-it/
I follow a rule of thumb that if an offer looks like a business model with the actual product as an afterthought it's probably very skippable.
Not to argue but I have solid relationships with several (monopoly like) vendors:
Apple
Google
Amazon (helps when you’re the sole healthcare assistant for someone that needs you 24x7 for weeks at a time)
AT&T (mostly because my mother and sister worked from them back in the day when they provided a pension, Union Shop, etc)
These corporations employee a lot of people and generally pay reasonably with benefits. The newer companies
are trending towards a 1099 “Gig” Model which is really risky for the individual.
No argument at all - monopolies can even be useful, as you say. I guess I'm really thinking of smaller companies, and asking myself did they get into the game because they had a product and a dream - or because they had a new paradigm to disrupt the metadata monetisation space.