Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Vatanator SX or Funk Box?

2»

Comments

  • @wim said:

    @Carnbot said:
    You missed my point here. I personally don't think core app functionality should be split into iap. It's messy.
    Like I said I don't have a problem with a price rise after they implement it. Just raise the price to cover the extra cost of development.

    Ahh. I see. Good point.

    I can also see that for a developer they might think this is being kind to the people who don't know an AUv3 from a hole in the wall and wouldn't understand the reason for such a price increase. We take it for granted here that AUv3 is core functionality. I'm not sure that it has that recognition for the general consumer. I could be wrong on that for sure. I've never incurred significant inconvenience from the iAP process, so I don't see it as an inconvenience.

    But, I do get your point.

    Yes, I think it could lead to issues when using the app, it's also like paying for IAA functionality as an extra. It's up to the developer if they want to implement it but I think raising the base price of the app seems the best way. I really want to see AU as the default standard, not an added extra if you see what I mean :)

  • @db909 said:
    Beat machine

    I have Beat Machine. A fun little app.

  • wimwim
    edited August 2017

    @Carnbot said:
    Yes, I think it could lead to issues when using the app, it's also like paying for IAA functionality as an extra. It's up to the developer if they want to implement it but I think raising the base price of the app seems the best way. I really want to see AU as the default standard, not an added extra if you see what I mean :)

    I do. And it should be. B)

    It's just that there's no other way for developers of existing apps to gain any revenue from customers who already purchased the app before all that work went into it to add AUv3. They can jack the price (thereby possibly reducing sales) to try to get it from new customers. But iAP is the only way for them to receive anything from those who have already purchased. I would gladly pay for AUv3 as an iAP as a thank-you to developers from whom we all regularly receive absolutely free of their hard work.

    I've always thought a "say thank you" iAP that does essentially nothing but compensate the developer for all the freebies would be great.

Sign In or Register to comment.