Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
imho the fact that remixes are more important than new albums is corny.... so I have mixed feelings about this.
we are living in bizzaro world. Now an songs release is nothing more than a teaser for the awaited remix by dj who gives a fuck, who doesn't understand the difference between a song, a remix, and an Edit but is super eager to let you know how his artistic vision lead to the track. as a sample fiend samplist with turntablist abilities even I've had enough.
but the article is very interesting, thanks for posting
Yeah I don't get it either.
Slightly Off Topic of the off topic thread.
I came to an odd realization the other day.
Remembering about all the to do about Napster and the continued voices from the music world about how the internet steals their music. They want their music off the internet unless being specifically paid for.
Music that they play instruments and such.
It is so fascinating that electronic music, which doesn't have a true musical instruments or presence like a band FREE GIVES its music and performances online by artists and others and HAS no NEGATIVE impact on the Electronic(DJ) artists.
Quite the contrary. It builds excitement to see them live.
Which is so ironic, because it is not like a band performing, in reality it is playing some files/tracks with some fx applied. Don't get me wrong, I am a DJ myself. Not trashing the group.
People want electronic music live for the unique live mixes and experience and free distrubution of electronic music is a positive and takes nothing out of the pockets of the artists.
Live is where the money is at.
Even though they don't play actual instruments.
It just hit me in an odd ironic sort of way.
If I explained my thought process correctly.
I find a great deal of similarity with Hollywood, where the overwhelming paradigm seems to be to take an old film and redo it. Sometimes this works, but mostly it seems that the original was better. The point being that the easy path is first one taken.
In either of the music or film arts, is must be heartbreaking and frustrating to have new, original, and in many cases, highly-crafted material, passed over for the quick and easy route of replication.
Hey, I'm still waiting for a faithful The Postman Always Rings Twice with a brunette Cora Smith.
It's an attempt to make sure the people get paid when they do remixes using their material rather than having to police sites with remixes. A significant proportion of the public listens to remixes so they're trying to adapt their copyright policies to meet this demand.
That's interesting. As you say the money is in live performance and merchandise. And yet many djs are only hitting play on a mac file and raking in money, so giving away their tracks for low value upfront still yields return by way of maximising ticket sales.
However what about producers who aren't djs, and produce tracks that aren't able to deliver a return on the same way. Their time and creativity is given away for free and they have mouths to feed too. I see both sides to the free music paradigm. I think you need to be very savvy to make it work for your individual case.
@Rustik, DJ's are definitely musicians imo, at least the ones I call DJs... I'm just talking about any musician really who doesn't differentiate between a new song, a remix of that song, and an edit of that song ,... if you do the latter of the two but call it the first then I tend to disagree. Sometimes the debate surrounds how much original work that the remixer put into the remix for example keep only an pella and make everything else from scratch... many talented folk go this route but my thing is then don't call it a remix, call it a new instrumental featuring the vocals from another song, or call it a new vocal featuring the music of another song.... I like making remixes too, it's just my opinion but if you didn't re-mix-the-song- and just placed new and original wonderful music under the song then it's not a remix. .... and I do think it is ridiculous that people just release new music to get remixed like the remix is the actual release, ass backwards bah humbug!
I just think it's weird, a record drops by an artist you like and the first thing out your mouth is you can't wait for the remix lol
Bring back the old days, you used to get the 7" and 12" released together.
Probably a smart move.
Off topic on the off topic but 'the problem with the music industry' illustrated by two quotes from the article:
Other two. fml.
"mixed content". ewww. They raised $4 million dollars in Series A with that kind of talk.
Music is just a commodity to the industry. Or at least the big (fml) three.
A great song shines through different arrangements, covers, remixes, whatever. Everything else disappears in the sands of time.
with the exception of the original release, that disappears soon as the remix comes out which is usually later that afternoon. When they say they love your music what they really mean is they'd love it if Diplo took your second verse, put some Diplo music under it and call it a remix.
100%
Who do you call DJs then?
Names I mean.
It may be your art but once you unleash it......
then the original song was just a throwaway to get to the remix. that is, not a great song.
@knewspeak & Luke ..... I concur on the sentiments..... but what we are talking about here is the system... I think the system in regard to remixes is set up to be disposable. Considering what a remix was originally intended for I just find it uncanny.
@Rustik, I could run off some names but then we'd be in subjective territory without our objectivity. Whomever DJs you feel are musicians is perfectly good enough whether I like them or not, I'm more weirded out by these practices
Personally I lean more towards the kid koalas of the world in my likings