Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
OT: You’re not going to believe this
This really has nothing to do with audio, etc. But it’s so good... Had to share
Comments
Good article, er, comic rather. Very gentle in its explanation. Hopefully this will stop others from bickering and fighting over the stupidest shit and continue to sustain the peace in our humble forum.
Hi!
Hey, ya know what? I don’t care.
I have no idea what the previous message above is about but I'm just gonna say thanks for sharing!
My pleasure.
The subject was OT about a comic on why people tend not to believe ideas you tell them which conflict with their core beliefs. What subject title would you have given for a thread with a link to the comic?
One of my core beliefs is that people are frequently unreasonable which of course is dependent upon my ability to divide everything in the world into reasonable or unreasonable. The primary criteria seems to be that I don't like what they're doing. Everything after that ends up being a long story to justify my own preferences.
Man, I always enjoy your replies. Logical, level headed, and on point.
Me and my little toe liked it.
I don't even know what I am and have had a completely immersive firsthand experience of it my whole life. With that much data and so few conclusions why should I believe or accept anything I am merely told by someone else?
How can I change the world when I can't change myself.
Uhhh... nope.
How about, "OT Comic about core beliefs and conflict"? It would be a little shorter and presumably a person wouldn't post something they didn't find interesting plus conflict requires the existence of them.
At least the comic does explain why some people would be affected by the revelation of different information so the concept can be understood even if a particular reader didn't have the reaction the comic author attempted to invoke.
I think that one of the brilliant ways this works, is that it doesn't spell it all out for you to begin with. They draw you in with a little bit of mystery, and keep your attention until the end. And then wrap it up nicely.
To go overboard with exposition about what the link was about, wouldn't have achieved the same effect. And, the reason I shared it to begin with.
tja evidently would prefer to have everything spelled out and as much information as possible before clicking on a link. There's nothing wrong with that, but in this case, divulging too much about the content would've spoiled the slick delivery of the message regarding beliefs.
Is it "sad" that I don't really care if someone I don't know on the internet doesn't like the lack of exposition associated with a brilliantly executed comic book link about core belief behavior? Not really. I know I'm not sad.
This may be yet another situation where you can't please all of the people all of the time. I can imagine there'd be some people who want concise detailed thread subjects, some who don't have a strong opinion about it, and others who share your perspective.
On the Oatmeal... I nabbed it from my wife's feed. Thought it was cool and thought I'd share with the peeps here.
I think they held back a little bit intentionally with the Jesus and slavery stuff. It's just my speculation, but I'm guessing that if they wen't too far, they'd lose some viewers who wouldn't make it all the way to the end. They'd have a negative knee-jerk reaction and not even get to the very point they likely needed to get to more than anyone.
So, I'm guessing they kept the examples as only mildly irritating to some and not full onslaught on purpose.
It's a good piece. I've wondered how some cling so tightly to some beliefs despite much evidence to the contrary. It's a human thing and complex, but they did an excellent job of explaining just how this happens.
This was the short version of all the books I have read