Exist a bluetooth headphone that works without latency? If they are open even better

trrracker

Something to use with garageband and another musicians apps. If it is open better because i have a close ones (with cable) that makes me sweat or a lot of heat

Edit
I’m not sure but i read in some pages that this ones could work for music production

https://www.guitarcenter.com/Audio-Technica/ATH-M50XBT-Bluetooth-Closed-Back-Headphones.gc

[Deleted User]

No....sadly.

ToMess

Yea the latency comes with the current bluetooth technology and theres nothing else to do about it than to come up with new bluetooth versions till we get there and that will require hardware supporting it, not just code. I wouldnt expect that to happen in at least a few years.

SevenSystems

Your best bet currently is getting one of those tiny FM transmitters that plug into the headphone jack (marketed for car use) and then getting headphones with an integrated FM radio.

See also my proposal for a new wireless audio standard based on 100 year old analog technology which would solve your problem and blow current Bluetooth audio out of the water (I know, one can dream...)

https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/29569/why-is-there-no-simple-passive-analog-wireless-audio-standard#latest

sysexual

its bluetooth that has latency. not the hardware.

trrracker

@sysexual @SevenSystems @ToMess @Cib

What about this one? I read in some websites that it’s for music production
https://www.guitarcenter.com/Audio-Technica/ATH-M50XBT-Bluetooth-Closed-Back-Headphones.gc

knewspeak

It's all got latency, the question is to what extent, unless you use quantum entanglement, then latency is involved at the point of observation in spacetime.

SevenSystems

@trrracker can't visit that link due to data protection...

@knewspeak with a pure analog solution, the light propagation latency of approx. 2/300,000,000 seconds at a distance of 2 meters (0.000006 milliseconds) should only be noticeable by the most trained listeners though

knewspeak

@SevenSystems said:
@trrracker can't visit that link due to data protection...

@knewspeak with a pure analog solution, the light propagation latency of approx. 2/300,000,000 seconds at a distance of 2 meters (0.000006 milliseconds) should only be noticeable by the most trained listeners though

The hydrogen band is free, but SETI and ETs may freak out.

SevenSystems

@knewspeak said:

@SevenSystems said:
@trrracker can't visit that link due to data protection...

@knewspeak with a pure analog solution, the light propagation latency of approx. 2/300,000,000 seconds at a distance of 2 meters (0.000006 milliseconds) should only be noticeable by the most trained listeners though

The hydrogen band is free, but SETI and ETs may freak out.

I'm sure that finding free frequencies should be a non-issue, especially since all of analog TV recently got shut off at least in Europe (I think...)

knewspeak

@SevenSystems said:

@knewspeak said:

@SevenSystems said:
@trrracker can't visit that link due to data protection...

@knewspeak with a pure analog solution, the light propagation latency of approx. 2/300,000,000 seconds at a distance of 2 meters (0.000006 milliseconds) should only be noticeable by the most trained listeners though

The hydrogen band is free, but SETI and ETs may freak out.

I'm sure that finding free frequencies should be a non-issue, especially since all of analog TV recently got shut off at least in Europe (I think...)

Digitally encoded, but still an interleaved analog transmission using those frequencies.

trrracker

@SevenSystems the link talk about audio technica ath-m50xbt headphones

Liquidmantis

Bluetooth requires compression and inherently adds latency. It's arguably okay for mixing or general monitoring but useless for tracking.