Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Kraftwerk legal battle on sampling

Comments

  • TheAudioDabblerTheAudioDabbler

    We all better just start going micro tonal in our music. 12 notes are not enough to not get hit with some sort of copyright. SMH

    On another note, if you like a guitar part of a song, then just record your own version instead of sampling it. It shouldn’t be that hard to record a 2 second guitar part.

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

  • encenc

    I guess these type of cases are in court a lot more than we get to hear about.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @AndyPlankton said:
    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

    It means I can still use that crazy bastard, Egoist! :)

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @Beathoven said:

    @AndyPlankton said:
    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

    It means I can still use that crazy bastard, Egoist! :)

    haha .. every cloud :)

  • CracklePotCracklePot

    @AndyPlankton said:
    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

    Judging by the Stairway to Heaven case and the Blurred Lines case, it is ALL subjective.
    It seems to depend on what that particular jury thinks they hear.

  • AndyPlanktonAndyPlankton

    @CracklePot said:

    @AndyPlankton said:
    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

    Judging by the Stairway to Heaven case and the Blurred Lines case, it is ALL subjective.
    It seems to depend on what that particular jury thinks they hear.

    Or got paid >:)

  • Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredrWrlds2ndBstGeoshredr

    What about the Katy Perry decision? I couldn’t stand to listen to more than two seconds of either version, so I don’t know if there was plagiary or not. If I were on the jury I’d find both parties guilty of crimes against humanity.

  • SuboiduaSuboidua

    i guess any song that hits the Top Ten becomes a top target... so we're safe :D

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhochberg/2019/07/30/jury-kills-katy-perrys-dark-horse-in-another-controversial-copyright-verdict/#54a4b15a5d21

  • audio_DTaudio_DT

    @Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredr said:
    What about the Katy Perry decision? I couldn’t stand to listen to more than two seconds of either version, so I don’t know if there was plagiary or not. If I were on the jury I’d find both parties guilty of crimes against humanity.

    :smiley: My thinking exactly.

  • ZaubrerZaubrer
    edited July 2019

    @CracklePot said:

    @AndyPlankton said:
    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

    Judging by the Stairway to Heaven case and the Blurred Lines case, it is ALL subjective.
    It seems to depend on what that particular jury thinks they hear.

    Luckily there is no jury in Europe, especially in Germany where the case started.

    The ruling is only good for EU based artists anyways.

  • kinkujinkinkujin

    @audio_DT said:

    @Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredr said:
    What about the Katy Perry decision? I couldn’t stand to listen to more than two seconds of either version, so I don’t know if there was plagiary or not. If I were on the jury I’d find both parties guilty of crimes against humanity.

    :smiley: My thinking exactly.

    hahahahahaha!

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    edited July 2019
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • rs2000rs2000

    @AndyPlankton said:
    This part seems subjective....

    But the ECJ also ruled that use of a modified sample that was unrecognisable from the original could be used without permission.

    The word "unrecognisable" is a joke. Musicians would never choose such wording.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]
    edited July 2019
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredrWrlds2ndBstGeoshredr

    Whatever happened with the suit against that kid who allegedly ripped off "Let's Get It On"? That was a pretty outrageous plagiary claim too.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2024