Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Anyone using a UAD Arrow or Apollo w iPad?

Less worries about the plugins and wondering if it provides a smooth experience overall

Comments

  • It definitely doesn't work as an IOS interface, unless UAD recently released the control software (which is essential for controlling the DSP chips within the interface) for IOS.
    Never heard any rumors about this, though.

    But of course you can use the UAD system with an iPad/iPhone connected to the analog input/output of an Apollo running on PC/Mac.

    'Less worries about the plugins...' suggests that you may look at an RME interface, which has the exact same preamp channels as the Apollo, which works flawless in IOS with RME's Total Mix control software.
    UAD is all about the plugins and their realtime use without DAW buffer.
    That's what sets it apart from Asio, RTAS or Audio Unit processing... and comes with a significant price tag. Either like it or leave it.
    (imh experience (Pro Tools TDM, Creamware Scope) hardware DSP is a huge benefit)

  • ^this is super helpful, thanks!

  • I think the UAD solo with USB C cable should work.
    Of course you can't access the plugins in IOS
    But it should work in a D.A.w. or Audioshare

  • I have the Arrow, which needs Thunderbolt 3 and isn't class compliant. The Mac version of the Solo is basically a rebadged Arrow as far as I understand, so I highly doubt it will work with iOS.

  • I’m 100% sure it won’t work. A different port in this case means nothing.

  • @0tolerance4silence said:
    I’m 100% sure it won’t work. A different port in this case means nothing.

    The SSL 2+ is not supposed to work with iPad but it does...
    Someone has to buy it and test it......the USB-C version of course the plugins won't work.

  • edited March 2021

    ops

  • The Apollo solo usb is windows only.

  • True > @mrufino1 said:

    The Apollo solo usb is windows only.

    True and duly noted

  • The plain interface sound of Arrow and Apollo is identical to RME interfaces, so both versions of the Babyface apply. They all use Texas Instruments PGA2500 integrated preamp chips as the only analog input parts.

  • The good news is if Apple ever went portless, as speculated, feared, and with pitchforks ready in another thread, then the ua interfaces will work just as well as any other interface. 😉

  • @mrufino1 said:
    The good news is if Apple ever went portless, as speculated, feared, and with pitchforks ready in another thread, then the ua interfaces will work just as well as any other interface. 😉

    lol 😂 good one

  • @Telefunky said:
    The plain interface sound of Arrow and Apollo is identical to RME interfaces, so both versions of the Babyface apply. They all use Texas Instruments PGA2500 integrated preamp chips as the only analog input parts.

    Really? Very interesting 🤔 Does anything else (calibration, power, etc) affect the plain interface sound?

  • edited March 2021

    The PGA2500 is an expensive part, so you can expect any manufacturer who’s using it to care for appropriate power supply and AD/DA conversion.
    There may exist (very) subtle differences in the sound under cans, but I cannot remember one single review ever that mentioned particular attributes of interface output stages.
    You expect them to be neutral and supply enough loudness for monitoring - and that‘s what you get.

    The PGA2500 on the other hand is an item worth thinking about before purchase.
    It‘s well known for an extremely precise sound, it lacks any character (unless „sterile“ is considered as such).
    That‘s one reason for it‘s appreciation in modeling software that adds the acoustic character of gear to signal, like UAD does.
    The other reason is that it‘s analog performance can be controlled digitally. (gain, impedance)

Sign In or Register to comment.