Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

[topic removed]

13»

Comments

  • edited January 2020

    @audiblevideo said:

    @espiegel123 said:
    @audiblevideo : thanks for posting. You are right the distortion makes it a bit hard to get a sense of things.

    Anyone else have some audio or video to share.

    I'll redo and upload when I get a chance.

    It was my first time screen recording and uploading to here.

    thanks for doing that!

    for some reason I thought that Unisonic was able to adjust in smaller increments than semitones. It seems that both unisonic and qvox won't do what I'm trying to do: harmonic pitch shifting in Just Intonation.

    Eventide Quadravox for desktop does this and it's incredible. So does Harmony Eight by virsyn (although the pitch shifting isn't as smooth). Guess I'll be sticking with those.

  • edited January 2020

    @audiobussy said:
    @audiblevideo JAX sounds way better in this example. Can anyone offer an exampleWhere the eventide sounds much better?

    No wonder that it sounds better, a steady synth sound is about the easiest to pitch-shift.
    Try it with more percussive, rhythmic sounds.

    @audiblevideo: Thanks for taking the time!

  • @espiegel123 said:
    @audiblevideo : thanks for posting. You are right the distortion makes it a bit hard to get a sense of things.

    Anyone else have some audio or video to share.

    Here is a video :

  • The warbly sound of Unisonic is great for dark, trippy chords for sure 😉

  • One thing I noticed - Unisonic is noticeably louder than QVox using default settings for both apps, even when just using four voices in Unisonic. I had to turn down the volume quite a bit in Unisonic to properly compare. I prefer the delay, panning, gain options and the basic sound of Unisonic, but might opt for QVox for busier compositions - it seems just slightly cleaner. Another thing - Unisonic is essentially chromatic, but QVox forces you into a particular scale which can be good or bad depending. Like them both, and glad to have them.

  • I think that JAX is MORE of a chorus and thickener than an absolute pitchshifter at least that's what all its other controls like the big dial in the middle tells me.

    I like it, even if its a bit fizzier on the top end and not as crisp on the bottom than Qvox, it doesn't suffer from what I've seen with Qvox and its warble (which depending on the source and timing isn't always there).

  • How does it compare to Discord?

  • The Convoluter is still a click fest for me, and a cpu hog. I wonder if Jens is checking this work at various samplerates.... like 96k

  • @espiegel123 said:
    How does it compare to Discord?

    If you instantiate multiple Discord’s ( to recreate the up to 8 voices of Unisonic ) utilising fine control for unison/detuning, you will get something similar. The cpu cost will be different though.

    Unisonic is dedicated to this effect, uses less cpu, and sounds different.

    I’ll echo audiblevideo’s thinking. Unisonic is a chorus/thickener, actually a multi-voice chorus/ensemble sound. I don’t think Jens is using delay/bbd, so technically not chorus ensemble like ensemble favourites Solina and MTI. guessing unison pitch shifting in cents, maybe with a short delay between each voice? Perhaps Jens would clarify? Probably doesn’t matter to most, so I’ll just say it sounds great.

    I was using multiple choruses, multiple MicroPitch, and multiple pitch shifters to achieve this sound before the release of unisonic. Now iOS users have access to a lower cpu option for ensemble type effects.

    The additional components in unisonic ( semitone pitch control and simple per voice delay ) are useful, but aren’t what the effect is about imo. I don’t even use those parts.

    If you ( or other forum members ) need audio examples in addition to the audiblevideo and cuscolima examples, i’ll try. What application is best for posting wav/aiff audio examples to the forum? Dropbox?

  • @espiegel123 said:
    What is the quality of the pitch-shifting compared to quadravox and what is the CPU use like ? The specs are good, but there haven't been any examples posted.

    Ignoring unisonic’s unison/ensemble part, which sounds amazing, and using the pitch shifters only ( for pitch shifting duties only - semitones and octaves), the QVox is much better. Better tracking, considerably less warble, and an algo that is designed specifically for harmonising. Unisonic’s purpose is different.

  • @frond
    Thanks for this helpful info!

  • @TimRussell said:
    How does this app compare with any of the other harmonisers out there?
    I have Harmoniz, Discord4 (only 4 voices) and 4pockets Vocal Soloist, wondering if this brings anything new to the table.

    It’s different. Unison/ensemble effect. Though, can do some harmoniser effects as well.

    Discord4 does 4 distinct mono pitch shifted voices, or 2 stereo ?

  • @frond said:

    @TimRussell said:
    How does this app compare with any of the other harmonisers out there?
    I have Harmoniz, Discord4 (only 4 voices) and 4pockets Vocal Soloist, wondering if this brings anything new to the table.

    It’s different. Unison/ensemble effect. Though, can do some harmoniser effects as well.

    Discord4 does 4 distinct mono pitch shifted voices, or 2 stereo ?

    Two voices, each stereo. More voices means more instances of it.

  • @palms
    I'm still trying to decide between this and the eventide one. I'm leaning toward Unisonic,
    but I'd really like to hear what it sounds like

    The qvox and unisonic are very different and accomplish different processing goals.

    QVox doesn’t allow for unison/cent tuning, so can’t do unison/ensemble effects.

    Unisonic is not a diatonic pitch shifter, so can’t track your playing based on key/scale like QVox.

  • @rs2000 said:
    Two voices, each stereo. More voices means more instances of it.

    Thanks. Thought I might have missed four mono voices. Ensemble/unison needs at least three to sound right. Solina used three delays, MTI three, tri-stereo chorus three, Roland often used four, etc.

  • @frond said:

    @rs2000 said:
    Two voices, each stereo. More voices means more instances of it.

    Thanks. Thought I might have missed four mono voices. Ensemble/unison needs at least three to sound right. Solina used three delays, MTI three, tri-stereo chorus three, Roland often used four, etc.

    Oops, sorry, I was wrong. One voice left, one voice right. It's up to you how you're going to use the two independent pitch shifting channels.
    For stereo, that means one instance per voice.

  • From Soundformore

  • This developer definitely has a certain style of communication...

  • @gusgranite said:
    This developer definitely has a certain style of communication...

    😃 well, maybe he wouldn't find a job in the public relations field and maybe his style is a little too direct, but he certainly isn't a hypocrite person, and he doesn't play puns. And this for me is a good quality in a man.

  • edited January 2020

    @Faland said:

    @gusgranite said:
    This developer definitely has a certain style of communication...

    😃 well, maybe he wouldn't find a job in the public relations field and maybe his style is a little too direct, but he certainly isn't a hypocrite person, and he doesn't play puns. And this for me is a good quality in a man.

    He was insulting on this forum of at least one respected developer who expressed disagreement with him about a technical topic.

    I really like his software, but I don't love the aggressive and sometimes insulting tone he takes when he disagrees with someone.

  • Direct yes, but also wrong.

  • @espiegel123 said:

    @Faland said:

    @gusgranite said:
    This developer definitely has a certain style of communication...

    😃 well, maybe he wouldn't find a job in the public relations field and maybe his style is a little too direct, but he certainly isn't a hypocrite person, and he doesn't play puns. And this for me is a good quality in a man.

    I think it needs to be said that he has been openly insulting of other developers about topics where Jens was in error -- and accused them of incompetence before doing research. I like his software, but I don't love his insulting people.

    This being the case, it is certainly less fun. Too bad because i really like his apps.

  • Yes, he is coming off as pretty hubristic. We all know where that leads...

  • @cian said:
    Direct yes, but also wrong.

    Yes, "dependencies between instances" is a really bad idea.

    And

    "now we want to teach these host developers"

    Really? :|

  • well, insulting is always unfair, even when you're right, let alone when you're wrong.

    If so, and I have no reason to doubt you, I can't find justifications.

    So this is definitely not a quality I appreciate in a person.

Sign In or Register to comment.