Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Two Polyend Seqs. vs One Polyend Seq. & Squarp Pyramid
I do have the chance to get 2 poly seqs., just to give polyphony right space to move in...
I just like the workflow on the seqs.
Do you think one poly seq. with a squarp pyramid would make more sense? ( in order to cover both worlds: drumkit and plenty of polyphonic tracks)
Also, when working in song mode...how easy would be to integrate both PS and Pyramid...timeline wise, arranging/sync patterns and so on...
To me...having 2 poly seqs. makes a better integration and overall efficiency.
What is your take on this? Thx
Comments
What are you trying to do? I would think the Pyramid does it all for you.
I will use different midi sources for sequencing...but don’t wanna have restrictions on number tracks ( polyend seq) regarding polyphonic melodic lines. If you use a 3 note polyphony on the polyend seq, that will eat up 3 tracks out of 8 . Same time, I do prefer the seq’s layout...so if I would have 2 seqs that would change everything. It’s immediate.
Is there any restrictions with the pyramid regarding tracks and polyphony?
Have a look here:
He also has a PolyEnd one here:
And his MPC One here:
