Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Looperator: Super deep dive!! WINNERS ANNOUNCED!

Looperator: Super deep dive!! 2 COPIES OF THE APP AVAILABLE TO WIN!!

I absolutely love this app. and I think this is one of my best tutorials to date, too.

Looperator is NOT just for EDM-lovers, but can genuinely be used with a wide variety of electronic music styles, even ambient. The basic principle is setting up sequences of various effects and looping them. It can do all kinds of things, from funky delay and filtering effects, to stuttering, granular, glitchy madness. Extremely cool. The manual is about 70 pages long, but if you watch this video in full you will have a very good idea of how to use the app proficiently.

Sugar Bytes are offering 2 FREE COPIES OF THE APP FOR SUBSCRIBERS TO THIS CHANNEL. For details of how to win, look at the comment pinned at the top of the YouTube comments section for the vid. Cheers!

«1

Comments

  • A question for those of you who know the trio of Looperator, Effectrix and Turnado inside out. Would you say Looperator supercedes these other two or are there things you feel Effectrix and Turnado do better?

  • They are similar and different at the same time. For me the most versatile is Turnado.

  • Thnx Charles, versatile in what ways?

  • It has a ton of presets and very strange effects to manipulate sound. If you don’t have it I really recommend to try.
    I am not a Master using it but one of your tutorial would be really appreciated✌️

  • Turnado is way more versatile. (top one for me)

    • way more fx
    • more interesting ways to play em
  • I have both, they just never grabbed me the way Looperator did, probably because I took the time to learn it, read the manual etc, but not the others. @waka_x @Charlesalbert

  • @Gavinski said:
    Looperator: Super deep dive!! 2 COPIES OF THE APP AVAILABLE TO WIN!!

    I absolutely love this app. and I think this is one of my best tutorials to date, too.

    Looperator is NOT just for EDM-lovers, but can genuinely be used with a wide variety of electronic music styles, even ambient. The basic principle is setting up sequences of various effects and looping them. It can do all kinds of things, from funky delay and filtering effects, to stuttering, granular, glitchy madness. Extremely cool. The manual is about 70 pages long, but if you watch this video in full you will have a very good idea of how to use the app proficiently.

    Sugar Bytes are offering 2 FREE COPIES OF THE APP FOR SUBSCRIBERS TO THIS CHANNEL. For details of how to win, look at the comment pinned at the top of the YouTube comments section for the vid. Cheers!

    Must be spying on me... I am so impressed with this app... I’m waiting for SB’s summer sale to grab the desktop version... NKS would make it a monster for Maschine.. Amazing app..

  • @Gavinski said:
    A question for those of you who know the trio of Looperator, Effectrix and Turnado inside out. Would you say Looperator supercedes these other two or are there things you feel Effectrix and Turnado do better?

    The Idea of sequencing an effect/s sets it apart...

  • @RajahP Thnx! Doesn’t Effectrix also do that though?

  • I would really like to be able to limit the steps in Looperator like you can in Effectrix

  • For polyrhythyms? Or some other reason? That would be good. You can of course adjust note length, but only 3 settings for that. @gusgranite

  • @Gavinski said:
    @RajahP Thnx! Doesn’t Effectrix also do that though?

    The difference to me is, being able to place (seq) ‘slices’ where/when ever in the effect chain...

    Don,t think Effectrix does that..

  • Ah right, got you. That’s a good feature for sure.

  • @Gavinski said:
    For polyrhythyms? Or some other reason? That would be good. You can of course adjust note length, but only 3 settings for that. @gusgranite

    I just find that playing with shorter sequencer cycles is more creative for techno loop effects.

  • edited July 2020

    tip; the absolute/relative sync (dive into fx1 and 2) for triplets or p :)

  • @noob what does ‘or p’ mean?

  • Effectrix always seemed too limited... Looperator looks much better but for me these fxs are all about real-time use vs. seqed so I'm more into Turnado or GlitchCore. That said for or certain genres Effectrix and Looperator are gold.

  • Not sure I understand. Looperator does real time fx.

    @0tolerance4silence said:
    Effectrix always seemed too limited... Looperator looks much better but for me these fxs are all about real-time use vs. seqed so I'm more into Turnado or GlitchCore. That said for or certain genres Effectrix and Looperator are gold.

  • You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

  • lol should be dotted not "p" :#

  • @Gavinski said:
    Not sure I understand. Looperator does real time fx.

    @0tolerance4silence said:
    Effectrix always seemed too limited... Looperator looks much better but for me these fxs are all about real-time use vs. seqed so I'm more into Turnado or GlitchCore. That said for or certain genres Effectrix and Looperator are gold.

    I mean the UI is designed for real-time interaction - punch in/out + 2 parameters / fx - instead of sequenced... but I may have misunderstood Looperator tbh because haven't dived in deep yet :)

  • @mojozart said:
    You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

    I can’t see how to do that in the AU?

  • The random number generator has spoken!
    The lucky winners are:
    Enrique Raphael Page Perez
    Nigel Rogers

    Big congrats guys! 🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @mojozart said:
    You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

    Yes, exactly. I mention that in the vid. Though that doesn't allow for polyrhythms, which may be what others were saying is a limitation?

  • @gusgranite said:

    @mojozart said:
    You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

    I can’t see how to do that in the AU?

    Top section, right of the part that says 'host'

  • @gusgranite said:

    @mojozart said:
    You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

    I can’t see how to do that in the AU?

  • @0tolerance4silence said:

    @Gavinski said:
    Not sure I understand. Looperator does real time fx.

    @0tolerance4silence said:
    Effectrix always seemed too limited... Looperator looks much better but for me these fxs are all about real-time use vs. seqed so I'm more into Turnado or GlitchCore. That said for or certain genres Effectrix and Looperator are gold.

    I mean the UI is designed for real-time interaction - punch in/out + 2 parameters / fx - instead of sequenced... but I may have misunderstood Looperator tbh because haven't dived in deep yet :)

    punch in/out + 2 parameters / fx - instead of sequenced...? I don't understand what this means. Punch in / out?

  • @Gavinski said:

    @mojozart said:
    You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

    Yes, exactly. I mention that in the vid. Though that doesn't allow for polyrhythms, which may be what others were saying is a limitation?

    Sorry, I thought the review was saying you could adjust the amount of steps in a sequence. This is what I miss from Effectrix. Thanks though!

  • @mojozart said:

    @gusgranite said:

    @mojozart said:
    You can adjust the "step length" of the sequence:

    The step length used to loop the overall 16–step sequence can be half, quarter or one–eighth of a bar, meaning that the 16–step pattern runs for eight, four or two bars respectively.

    From https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/sugar-bytes-looperator

    I can’t see how to do that in the AU?

    Thanks @mojozart - misunderstanding on my part (see above)

  • Sometimes this app goes on sale? Because appsliced don’t report iap

Sign In or Register to comment.