Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Possibility, practicality or probability?

OscarSouthOscarSouth
in General App Discussion

In the context of music.

Thoughts/opinions?

Comments

  • OscarSouthOscarSouth

    Personally I’d have to go with practicality.

    I find with any instrument I’ve ever gelled with that I end up focussing in on nuance within a small collection of sounds rather than out into extended variety. Having practical access and precise control over this fine nuance is more important to my expression than being able to access many different timbres inside a short space of time.

    The possibilities of variety for me come through interaction within the ensemble.

    Probability is fun, but in the end I find that it’s a similar experience to finding good ideas through wrong execution — happy accidents can happen but it’s the exception rather than the rule, and the more I know the instrument intimately the less unpredictability I desire anyway.

  • NeonSiliconNeonSilicon

    Expectation value.

  • NeonSiliconNeonSilicon

    @OscarSouth said:
    Personally I’d have to go with practicality.

    I find with any instrument I’ve ever gelled with that I end up focussing in on nuance within a small collection of sounds rather than out into extended variety. Having practical access and precise control over this fine nuance is more important to my expression than being able to access many different timbres inside a short space of time.

    The possibilities of variety for me come through interaction within the ensemble.

    Probability is fun, but in the end I find that it’s a similar experience to finding good ideas through wrong execution — happy accidents can happen but it’s the exception rather than the rule, and the more I know the instrument intimately the less unpredictability I desire anyway.

    I agree with this. The precise control of a limited set of sounds is more satisfying to me as a listener and when I play.

  • ecamburnecamburn

    I can relate about your ideas about practicality. One of the things I love about Flip and NS2 are the large pads that are positionally sensitive. With Flip it's volume and pitch, with NS2 slate (zooming in on a single pad) it's just volume. You can coax so much expressive goodness out of just a single pad in both apps which allows you to get a lot of mileage out of small number of samples.

  • JohnnyGoodyearJohnnyGoodyear

    @ecamburn said:
    I can relate about your ideas about practicality. One of the things I love about Flip and NS2 are the large pads that are positionally sensitive. With Flip it's volume and pitch, with NS2 slate (zooming in on a single pad) it's just volume. You can coax so much expressive goodness out of just a single pad in both apps which allows you to get a lot of mileage out of small number of samples.

    Agree. Also why I love the Maschine; Pads lovely etc.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2025