Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
To Drambo or Aum?
Aum. Mapping synths and effects better to controllers but might use screen a lot to tweak ( synths anyway )
I could actually map and recall any synths and effects in aum though. Even move effects to different channels without remapping. Ec4 controller mappings. Recall aum imports. Mapping is there.
Using Aum. Although with Drambo. Means I have to commit to audio more. Of synths and effects.
Or Drambo. Which I can probably find a work around for everything. Including sending audio from an ipad to other ipad drambo (iaa. Also synths that are mapped to controllers for sure but that use more than 16 ccs and would need to be sent from an aum to Drambo ipad )
Only then have to remap Drambo synths and effects parameters as needed but the midi will be readily available from existing controller mappings
but gain automation editing.
Comments
Does anyone actually record automation of 16 synth parameters. 16 effects parameters per effect and then edit or just be happier knowing you can edit any automation.
Or can I just think. Ok. I might need to automation edit a few parameters of a synth or effect and setup to automation edit via aum using Drambo?
I think I should just make mapping saves via aum. As it would still be be used via Drambo.
Yup.
Even more than that actually.
That’s how I did this piece.
I recorded 16 lanes of Automation per CLIP.
Havent used app. What would be better. Aum host or Drambo host. Faderfox pc12 with aum and mapping cc lanes for automation recording using Drambo mfx. So 72 knobs. Or Drambo with ec4?
Whether the host is AUM or dRambo if you’re using dRambo for the automation it’ll record it.
Thanks.
Will need to check app.
Think I can record automation with Drambo in aum host.
Just working out a system. Could be an ideal aum and drambo automation solution. If cpu is ok.
@sigma79
“ Think I can record automation with Drambo in aum host.”
dRambo can definitely record automation when hosted in AUM.
Sweet Grav.
Encorperating cubasis maybe.
Will still need automation and aum midi.
No probs.
You can do the same thing in Cubasis 3.
Load up dRambo as an auv3 in Cubasis 3 and you can automate dRambo at will.
Getting it to change patterns along with Cubasis 3 will require some interesting
routings but it's the same thing in principle.
Not sure.
Dont think you can map controllers to au's.
Thought Id use beatcutter in cubasis but decided Id rather send cubasis tracks out to aum and beatcutter. Then import audio back. As aum seems easier.