Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

James Webb Photos

LinearLinemanLinearLineman
in Other

We were excited when James Webb launched. Now the rewards are coming in. The pics of Jupiter are the latest.

https://www.google.com/search?q=james+webb+photos&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

«1

Comments

  • LittlewoodgLittlewoodg
    edited August 2022

    @LinearLineman said:
    We were excited when James Webb launched. Now the rewards are coming in. The pics of Jupiter are the latest.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=james+webb+photos&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

    thanks for posting the link, Mr.
    Always a strange and beautiful thing to get off-world if only vicariously. It gives me solace. James Webb fo evah.

  • KrupaKrupa

    I’m trying my best to use some Webb stuff in the rock pop visuals project I’m busy with right now; bit of a space theme to the whole thing…

  • senhorlampadasenhorlampada

    Wow... Amazing :open_mouth:

  • Kewe_EsseKewe_Esse

    There’s so much detail… we can look into space with greater sophistication than we can look into our selves, these days. Although, at a neurophysiological level, we are getter better and better…

  • IdentorIdentor

    Astronomers and theoretical scientist are scratching their head about the structures of galaxies in the early universe and does not go well along with the Big Bang Theory and Inflation period.
    Maybe the theory has to be rewritten. Exiting times.

  • GdubGdub

    Just fantastic
    Thanks for the link

  • PoppadocrockPoppadocrock

    I love space photos, lots are in public domain too, like from nasa, etc…

  • knewspeakknewspeak

    @Kewe_Esse said:
    There’s so much detail… we can look into space with greater sophistication than we can look into our selves, these days. Although, at a neurophysiological level, we are getter better and better…

    Understanding what we are made of, is good, but it’s the easy part, understanding why, get’s a lot more tricky.

  • michael_mmichael_m

    The results so far are only barely scratching the surface. I’m sure there will be many more amazing images during its lifetime.

  • db909db909

    Looks greyer than it used to

  • michael_mmichael_m

    @db909 said:
    Looks greyer than it used to

    Happens to us all when we get older.

  • db909db909
    edited August 2022

    @michael_m said:

    @db909 said:
    Looks greyer than it used to

    Happens to us all when we get older.

    Lol for sure. I’m only 35 but back in my day, Jupiter was a pinkish sandstone shade. Now it looks like a marble countertop. #notmyJupiter :D Nah it looks good though

    The color change of Jupiter is due to the infrared technology of the Webb. Hubble is optical. Feel free to use your crayons to color in the big red spot.

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen
    edited August 2022

    Self delete: crazy double post

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

    I am so disappointed, and it is all my fault.

    I misread the title as “Jack Webb Photos”
    😹

    These are still great, though

  • db909db909

    @db909 said:

    @michael_m said:

    @db909 said:
    Looks greyer than it used to

    Happens to us all when we get older.

    Lol for sure. I’m only 35 but back in my day, Jupiter was a pinkish sandstone shade. Now it looks like a marble countertop. #notmyJupiter :D Nah it looks good though

    The color change of Jupiter is due to the infrared technology of the Webb. Hubble is optical. Feel free to use your crayons to color in the big red spot.

    Damn where’d I put my crayons ?

  • drezdrez

    @db909 said:

    @michael_m said:

    @db909 said:
    Looks greyer than it used to

    Happens to us all when we get older.

    Lol for sure. I’m only 35 but back in my day, Jupiter was a pinkish sandstone shade. Now it looks like a marble countertop. #notmyJupiter :D Nah it looks good though

    The color change of Jupiter is due to the infrared technology of the Webb. Hubble is optical. Feel free to use your crayons to color in the big red spot.

    yeah I got that from the link above but am now confused...is the color correct from the Hubble or from the Webb?

  • knewspeakknewspeak

    @drez said:

    @db909 said:

    @michael_m said:

    @db909 said:
    Looks greyer than it used to

    Happens to us all when we get older.

    Lol for sure. I’m only 35 but back in my day, Jupiter was a pinkish sandstone shade. Now it looks like a marble countertop. #notmyJupiter :D Nah it looks good though

    The color change of Jupiter is due to the infrared technology of the Webb. Hubble is optical. Feel free to use your crayons to color in the big red spot.

    yeah I got that from the link above but am now confused...is the color correct from the Hubble or from the Webb?

    The new version is photoshopped because we don’t ‘see’ in that frequency.

  • GLaceyGLacey

    we can see farther, more details than ever before, but is it possible to spot the planets orbiting the nearby stars with this telescope? I’m much more excited to see these planets.

  • SchmotownSchmotown

    I’ve followed @HubbleTelescope on Twitter for years and more recently @ESA_Webb. I love seeing those images in the feed every day. Such a healthy counterbalance to what passes as news down here.

  • Kewe_EsseKewe_Esse

    @knewspeak said:
    Understanding what we are made of, is good, but it’s the easy part, understanding why, get’s a lot more tricky.

    I strongly disagree that understanding “what we are made of” is the easy part, given,

    1. That even the mathematical/physical basis itself for capturing and analysing, for example, EEG signals is under constant development:

    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.05.979062v1.full

    1. That the current MRI scanning tech has a time-domain resolution of about 50-100 frames per sec:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_MRI

    https://www.kurzweilai.net/high-speed-mri-technique-captures-complex-vocal-movements-at-100-frames-per-second

    1. The processes we are learning to visualise with such scans happen at ridiculous timescales, and as such are essentially invisible to us at this stage:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/quantum-interaction-10-000-times-faster-light-flna1c8889471

    I reckon we’re barely scratching the surface of our investigations into what we’re made of…

    But the point I was making was, even with all this knowledge, (with reference to how deeply we can look into space) we’re not gifted with the greatest of insight into our own feelings and behaviour, like when we buy a lotto ticket instead of giving that same tenner to charity… We are not the brilliant actualisers of our inner selves that we could be.

    Rant over!

  • knewspeakknewspeak

    @Kewe_Esse said:

    @knewspeak said:
    Understanding what we are made of, is good, but it’s the easy part, understanding why, get’s a lot more tricky.

    I strongly disagree that understanding “what we are made of” is the easy part, given,

    1. That even the mathematical/physical basis itself for capturing and analysing, for example, EEG signals is under constant development:

    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.05.979062v1.full

    1. That the current MRI scanning tech has a time-domain resolution of about 50-100 frames per sec:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_MRI

    https://www.kurzweilai.net/high-speed-mri-technique-captures-complex-vocal-movements-at-100-frames-per-second

    1. The processes we are learning to visualise with such scans happen at ridiculous timescales, and as such are essentially invisible to us at this stage:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/quantum-interaction-10-000-times-faster-light-flna1c8889471

    I reckon we’re barely scratching the surface of our investigations into what we’re made of…

    But the point I was making was, even with all this knowledge, (with reference to how deeply we can look into space) we’re not gifted with the greatest of insight into our own feelings and behaviour, like when we buy a lotto ticket instead of giving that same tenner to charity… We are not the brilliant actualisers of our inner selves that we could be.

    Rant over!

    I’d agree mostly with what you say and that there is so very, very much left to research and discover. When I say easy I don’t mean to demean efforts, I was phrasing it relative to understanding. Take for instance String Theory the LHC has yet to find evidence of the theory, synthetic RNA vaccine’s we have produced, yet given that knowledge, no one predicted the RNA would be converted to DNA within the human body. But there are exceptions to this Albert Einstein’s prediction’s for instance.

  • DaevDaev

    Action is needed to correct the suffocating sound tracks that accompany many videos about the JWST. Nearly all are in 4/4 with slave bass and drums.

  • SvetlovskaSvetlovska
    edited August 2022

    Just for you, @JeffChasteen :)

    Also: ‘Joe Friday’ is up there with ‘Lemmy Caution’ as top name for an investigator ever.

  • Kewe_EsseKewe_Esse

    @knewspeak said:

    I’d agree mostly with what you say and that there is so very, very much left to research and discover. When I say easy I don’t mean to demean efforts, I was phrasing it relative to understanding. Take for instance String Theory the LHC has yet to find evidence of the theory, synthetic RNA vaccine’s we have produced, yet given that knowledge, no one predicted the RNA would be converted to DNA within the human body. But there are exceptions to this Albert Einstein’s prediction’s for instance.

    I don’t get what you’re driving at. I appreciate also, my post was a bit waffly and rambly so pot, kettle, black… but not sure what you’re saying.

  • GeoTonyGeoTony

    @LinearLineman , Just watched an article about this https://www.apolloremastered.com/ on UK morning TV… quite amazing photographs. The details of the project and techniques used are fascinating.

  • knewspeakknewspeak

    @Kewe_Esse said:

    @knewspeak said:

    I’d agree mostly with what you say and that there is so very, very much left to research and discover. When I say easy I don’t mean to demean efforts, I was phrasing it relative to understanding. Take for instance String Theory the LHC has yet to find evidence of the theory, synthetic RNA vaccine’s we have produced, yet given that knowledge, no one predicted the RNA would be converted to DNA within the human body. But there are exceptions to this Albert Einstein’s prediction’s for instance.

    I don’t get what you’re driving at. I appreciate also, my post was a bit waffly and rambly so pot, kettle, black… but not sure what you’re saying.

    Simply we have so much before us to discover and understand, that summit of knowledge is still way above us, so we should be humbled and overjoyed that we have so much more left to discover.

  • db909db909

    @knewspeak said:

    @Kewe_Esse said:

    @knewspeak said:

    I’d agree mostly with what you say and that there is so very, very much left to research and discover. When I say easy I don’t mean to demean efforts, I was phrasing it relative to understanding. Take for instance String Theory the LHC has yet to find evidence of the theory, synthetic RNA vaccine’s we have produced, yet given that knowledge, no one predicted the RNA would be converted to DNA within the human body. But there are exceptions to this Albert Einstein’s prediction’s for instance.

    I don’t get what you’re driving at. I appreciate also, my post was a bit waffly and rambly so pot, kettle, black… but not sure what you’re saying.

    Simply we have so much before us to discover and understand, that summit of knowledge is still way above us, so we should be humbled and overjoyed that we have so much more left to discover.

    Agreed. I think too many people believe we know everything for some reason. Often when trying to speak of the unknowns, one is looked at as a quack merely for entertaining the possibilities

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

    @Svetlovska said:
    Just for you, @JeffChasteen :)

    Also: ‘Joe Friday’ is up there with ‘Lemmy Caution’ as top name for an investigator ever.

    Hi Jack!

    I’ve gotta agree with you about the brilliance of Joe Friday and Lemmy Caution.
    I’m also fond of Dashiell Hammett’s “The Continental Op” as a cop name.
    The poor nameless, existential sonofabitch is defined only by what he does.

  • Kewe_EsseKewe_Esse

    @knewspeak said:
    Simply we have so much before us to discover and understand, that summit of knowledge is still way above us, so we should be humbled and overjoyed that we have so much more left to discover.

    I can surely agree on this sentiment (if not exactly on your syntax) . I sense we’re not on the same page about ST/LHC or vaccine tech, although, speaking as a nuts-and-bolts, motors-and-sprockets sort of an engineer, I doubt I’ll be able to argue convincingly on the frontiers of modern science (as evidenced by my earlier post, lol)…

    What were you referring to re: Einstein? If you dropped in a few reference-links with your ideas it’d be much easier to respond :)

  • knewspeakknewspeak

    @Kewe_Esse said:

    @knewspeak said:
    Simply we have so much before us to discover and understand, that summit of knowledge is still way above us, so we should be humbled and overjoyed that we have so much more left to discover.

    I can surely agree on this sentiment (if not exactly on your syntax) . I sense we’re not on the same page about ST/LHC or vaccine tech, although, speaking as a nuts-and-bolts, motors-and-sprockets sort of an engineer, I doubt I’ll be able to argue convincingly on the frontiers of modern science (as evidenced by my earlier post, lol)…

    What were you referring to re: Einstein? If you dropped in a few reference-links with your ideas it’d be much easier to respond :)

    More information about mRNA
    https://www.science.org/content/article/further-evidence-offered-claim-genes-pandemic-coronavirus-can-integrate-human-dna

    And LHC and string theory
    https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2825069

    And still no confirmation

    For Einstein and collaboration ER, EPR, Quantum Mechanics collapse of the wave function, well the mathematics work, but our understanding of how it works, is still a way short.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2024