Physics based Midi Plugin coming from Cem Olcay

Jumpercollins

https://twitter.com/cem_olcay/status/1568560503877689344

belldu

At last, we can all pretend to be 'DoodleChaos'.
https://youtube.com/channel/UCnVimh35ecf46P_Bt-2AArg

belldu

and without wishing to subvert the thread completely, if you only ever watch one DoodleChaos video then watch this one:
https://youtu.be/fYVaHVHuARA

Svetlovska

Ooh. Excited to see this one! I already have this, which is great for random doom drums and angular fragments of melody:

https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/physicles/id1409156444

I have all the …Bud apps and the more experimental ones, e.g. the sort-of Marbles ShiftBud, and the sort-of Rene SnakeBud are my faves, so: high hopes for this.

Stuntman_mike

Rozeta Particles does something similar too!

Gavinski

Yeah will be very curious to see how it compares to Particles.

Svetlovska

Indeed. Particles and a touch of Zero reverb are my go to for somewhat predictable semi random doom drums, but if you want the full on physics experiment (thus far, anyway), Physicles is your babe, especially when you set the shapes moving, or mess with the gravity.

attakk

As we already have Rozetta Particles & Physicles then we’re already very well catered for for “physics-based chaos” generative plugins.

So I’m not interested in how this will compare to those two - but I want to see in what ways this doesn’t compare to those two.

If it’s just a 3rd rehash of what we already have then I don’t really see the point to be honest.

Stuntman_mike

Rozeta has some other generative goodies as well

Gavinski

Yeah will be very curious to see how it compares to Particles. > @attakk said:

As we already have Rozetta Particles & Physicles then we’re already very well catered for for “physics-based chaos” generative plugins.

So I’m not interested in how this will compare to those two - but I want to see in what ways this doesn’t compare to those two.

If it’s just a 3rd rehash of what we already have then I don’t really see the point to be honest.

Of course not. Unless you're very literal minded the phrase 'see how it compares' rather obviously means 'whether it brings anything new to the table'

Stuntman_mike

@Gavinski said:
Yeah will be very curious to see how it compares to Particles. > @attakk said:

As we already have Rozetta Particles & Physicles then we’re already very well catered for for “physics-based chaos” generative plugins.

So I’m not interested in how this will compare to those two - but I want to see in what ways this doesn’t compare to those two.

If it’s just a 3rd rehash of what we already have then I don’t really see the point to be honest.

Of course not. Unless you're very literal minded the phrase 'see how it compares' rather obviously means 'whether it brings anything new to the table'

Hopefully Cem’s new plugin brings its own twist because you can never have enough generative plugins like delay plugins 😂

Gavinski

@Stuntman_mike said:

@Gavinski said:
Yeah will be very curious to see how it compares to Particles. > @attakk said:

As we already have Rozetta Particles & Physicles then we’re already very well catered for for “physics-based chaos” generative plugins.

So I’m not interested in how this will compare to those two - but I want to see in what ways this doesn’t compare to those two.

If it’s just a 3rd rehash of what we already have then I don’t really see the point to be honest.

Of course not. Unless you're very literal minded the phrase 'see how it compares' rather obviously means 'whether it brings anything new to the table'

Hopefully Cem’s new plugin brings its own twist because you can never have enough generative plugins like delay plugins 😂

Yes! I must go and have a play with Physicles now actually, one of the many apps I have bought but barely used lol

Stuntman_mike

@Gavinski said:

@Stuntman_mike said:

@Gavinski said:
Yeah will be very curious to see how it compares to Particles. > @attakk said:

As we already have Rozetta Particles & Physicles then we’re already very well catered for for “physics-based chaos” generative plugins.

So I’m not interested in how this will compare to those two - but I want to see in what ways this doesn’t compare to those two.

If it’s just a 3rd rehash of what we already have then I don’t really see the point to be honest.

Of course not. Unless you're very literal minded the phrase 'see how it compares' rather obviously means 'whether it brings anything new to the table'

Hopefully Cem’s new plugin brings its own twist because you can never have enough generative plugins like delay plugins 😂

Yes! I must go and have a play with Physicles now actually, one of the many apps I have bought but barely used lol

Physicles is really cool, I need to get back to tinkering with it…

NeuM

Not my cup of tea, but might be fun for experimenters.

Poppadocrock

Yessss! Be happy to beta as per usual

espiegel123

Physicked is cool…a read through of the manual is essential. The u.i. is not the most obvious.

HotStrange

Nice! Can never have enough generative apps. Only own a few of the Bud apps but I really enjoy all the ones I have.

MrStochastic

Never one to rest on his laurels! ( I still wish he's do some minor improvements to LoopBud though)

Gavinski

@Stochastically said:
Never one to rest on his laurels! ( I still wish he's do some minor improvements to LoopBud though)

Like what for example? Have you made any requests?

MrStochastic

@Gavinski said:

@Stochastically said:
Never one to rest on his laurels! ( I still wish he's do some minor improvements to LoopBud though)

Like what for example? Have you made any requests?

Yes, I commented over on the LoopBud thread.
(https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/comment/1081875#Comment_1081875)
I know that it’s supposed to be a very bare-bones midi looper which I agree can be a useful thing, but as I asked there, I wish it had a mode where it waits for the first note event to begin recording. That would help keep clips aligned or synched better. Also, I think it would be very helpful if there was a mode where the recording would automatically stop after x amount of measures. That way you wouldn’t accidentally erase a take or start recording over it.
Now, come to think of it, I have another idea: How about a mode where once it recorded x measures for a scene it would automatically keep recording on a new scene, etc. then, on and on until there were no scenes left or you stopped. ?
I don’t think these ideas would make it any more complex of a looper.

I guess I'll try again over there and see what he thinks.

Gavinski

@Stochastically said:

@Gavinski said:

@Stochastically said:
Never one to rest on his laurels! ( I still wish he's do some minor improvements to LoopBud though)

Like what for example? Have you made any requests?

Yes, I commented over on the LoopBud thread.
(https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/comment/1081875#Comment_1081875)
I know that it’s supposed to be a very bare-bones midi looper which I agree can be a useful thing, but as I asked there, I wish it had a mode where it waits for the first note event to begin recording. That would help keep clips aligned or synched better. Also, I think it would be very helpful if there was a mode where the recording would automatically stop after x amount of measures. That way you wouldn’t accidentally erase a take or start recording over it.
Now, come to think of it, I have another idea: How about a mode where once it recorded x measures for a scene it would automatically keep recording on a new scene, etc. then, on and on until there were no scenes left or you stopped. ?
I don’t think these ideas would make it any more complex of a looper.

I guess I'll try again over there and see what he thinks.

Those all sound like reasonable and useful requests that probably wouldn't require much work 👍