Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Linnstrument worth having if my iPad has stuff like Velocity KB?

edited March 2023 in Hardware

Hi! I have 2 MIDI controllers, which are a MicroKey Air 61 for traditional keyboard playing and velocity and a LaunchPad Pro Mk 3 for scales, drums, and more compact stuff. I bought the LaunchPad for its aftertouch but find it to be wonky. I love Velocity KB, but I find that I have to put it on a stand. Otherwise, velocity doesn't work if my iPad is flat on a table.

Even with Velocity KB, my iPaf doesn't feel much like an instrument. I'm thinking of getting a Linnstrument for my 25th bday later this year (I was originally considering a hardware synth like the Take 5). Is the Linnstrument worth it? If so, is the 128 or 200 version better? I would love to have a Linnstrument in my backpack, but I heard that the 200 is better for keyboardists. What are your thoughts?

Comments

  • @frosttrance_7 said:
    Hi! I have 2 MIDI controllers, which are a MicroKey Air 61 for traditional keyboard playing and velocity and a LaunchPad Pro Mk 3 for scales, drums, and more compact stuff. I bought the LaunchPad for its aftertouch but find it to be wonky. I love Velocity KB, but I find that I have to put it on a stand. Otherwise, velocity doesn't work if my iPad is flat on a table.

    Even with Velocity KB, my iPaf doesn't feel much like an instrument. I'm thinking of getting a Linnstrument for my 25th bday later this year (I was originally considering a hardware synth like the Take 5). Is the Linnstrument worth it? If so, is the 128 or 200 version better? I would love to have a Linnstrument in my backpack, but I heard that the 200 is better for keyboardists. What are your thoughts?

    I would really love a linnstrument but don’t have one. I have however read a lot about them and the pros and cons. First of all, if you want to play 2 handed, most recommend the big one, yes. The big one is also useful if you want to use a section of it for a controller rather than a player.

    Some people rave about the linnstrument but I hear several main complaints:
    1. The y axis is a bit short for expression
    2. Some say it is hard to play the note on velocity predictably
    3. Some don’t like how hard the surface is, feeling there is not enough tactile feedback compared to, say, a seaboard. There is a guy who has made a kind of bumpy “skin” for the linnstrument, forget the name, but those are currently out of stock. They look great though.

    If you go to Roger Lynn’s website, he suggests contacting him, telling him where you live, and he will try to put you in touch with an owner who lives nearby who’ll be willing to let you try out theirs. With a major investment in a piece of kit like this, that would seem to be a sensible thing to do, if possible. Only when you try it will you really know if it is for you or not. Even then, it will take a fair bit of practice probably to really give it a decent chance.

  • @frosttrance_7 what are your main use cases for wanting an MPE controller? If independent note aftertouch for playing an MPE synth is important to you, then the Linnstrument is hard to beat from what I hear. If all you want is a guitar layout controller with velocity sensitivity, then velocity keyboard should suffice. I’ve heard many reviews complaining about the Linnstrument’s velocity response being imperfect. Velocity keyboard works best, in my experience, with something soft under it, such as a small pillow. I haven’t seen a side by side comparison of velocity accuracy between the two, though. If you are primarily planning on using it with SWAM instruments, then MPE isn’t as important as expression control.

    I was on the edge of buying a Linnstrument a couple of months ago, primarily for use with SWAM instruments. After a lot of research, I decided to go with a tecontrol breath controller, combined with velocity keyboard. This combination is INCREDIBLY accurate at all expression levels, and very intuitive to play (even as a guitarist with no wind instrument experience). I highly recommend this set up for melodic stuff, and pads, but it obviously wouldn’t be great for drumming or piano.

  • Just played the Linnstrument for the pat hour.
    Primarily I play it with a Continuumini. I’ve realized with the Linnstrument it takes a bit of patience to discover how to play each preset on the Continuumini, each is really a different instrument. Following that conclusion it can make so so so many software and hardware instruments so much more expressive and just fun to really play.
    You can customize your key/scale/lights to however you like but as a bass player keeping to fourths has been so conducive to learning more about theory, and sending various midi elements TO the Linnstrument to learn has been really helpful with my short attention span.
    Everyone that has written on this post has great points though. It’s a big investment and you can accomplish a great deal with less bucks, I’m sure the combo of the breath controller and velocity keyboard is killer!

    I can say though after really spending time to try and learn to play my Linnstrument 200 with two hands(as close to a piano style as I can) I want the Linnstrument to be my main instrument until my last breath.

  • One more thing
    Roger Linn has a zoom call every first Tuesday of the month.
    You can join in and ask questions right to Roger. The kind of support Roger Linn offers for the Linnstrument is nothing short of incredible. Links are on his site.

  • @tput73 said:
    One more thing
    Roger Linn has a zoom call every first Tuesday of the month.
    You can join in and ask questions right to Roger. The kind of support Roger Linn offers for the Linnstrument is nothing short of incredible. Links are on his site.

    that is impressive service indeed!

  • @Danny_Mammy said:

    @tput73 said:
    One more thing
    Roger Linn has a zoom call every first Tuesday of the month.
    You can join in and ask questions right to Roger. The kind of support Roger Linn offers for the Linnstrument is nothing short of incredible. Links are on his site.

    that is impressive service indeed!

    Yeah he really seems like a top guy.

  • edited March 2023

    @tput73 said:
    Just played the Linnstrument for the pat hour.
    Primarily I play it with a Continuumini. I’ve realized with the Linnstrument it takes a bit of patience to discover how to play each preset on the Continuumini, each is really a different instrument.

    This is key. Every patch is a unique instrument. Many require extensive practice to learn to play effectively--with any controller.

    I lack a Linnstrument, but I play VK or Geoshred almost every day. My main challenge is timing. It is very difficult to really sink into a pocket by tapping on the ipad. I can sail over the groove just fine; it's digging in that is difficult. I've always wondered if Linnstrument would solve that.

    The other advantage is that ipad lacks the Z dimension; Linstrument has it. I can live without Z no problem. I get plenty of expression from the ipad controllers. It's the timing that I'm missing.

    The ipad has one advantage over the Linnstument: you pick it up and power on and you're jamming. No cables, no need to schlep things around or find a space for them. All you need is the ipad. That is very attractive to me.

  • @FriedTapeworm said:
    @frosttrance_7 what are your main use cases for wanting an MPE controller? If independent note aftertouch for playing an MPE synth is important to you, then the Linnstrument is hard to beat from what I hear. If all you want is a guitar layout controller with velocity sensitivity, then velocity keyboard should suffice. I’ve heard many reviews complaining about the Linnstrument’s velocity response being imperfect. Velocity keyboard works best, in my experience, with something soft under it, such as a small pillow. I haven’t seen a side by side comparison of velocity accuracy between the two, though. If you are primarily planning on using it with SWAM instruments, then MPE isn’t as important as expression control.

    I was on the edge of buying a Linnstrument a couple of months ago, primarily for use with SWAM instruments. After a lot of research, I decided to go with a tecontrol breath controller, combined with velocity keyboard. This combination is INCREDIBLY accurate at all expression levels, and very intuitive to play (even as a guitarist with no wind instrument experience). I highly recommend this set up for melodic stuff, and pads, but it obviously wouldn’t be great for drumming or piano.

    I just want a good polyphonic aftertouch controller with customizable scales. I am open to trying out the three-axis way of playing, even if the velocity is not perfect.

  • Really like my Linnstrument. Never felt I needed more than 128 pads and prefer the more compact smaller version. Definitely better than playing on an iPad because it's a textured surface

  • @charalew said:
    Really like my Linnstrument. Never felt I needed more than 128 pads and prefer the more compact smaller version. Definitely better than playing on an iPad because it's a textured surface

    That's a huge advantage for Linnstrument over VK or GS. You have to play by always looking at the ipad. For me this makes harmonies quite difficult because it's harder to see multiple notes, especially when part of the hand is blocking the view. Going by feel is not accurate on the ipad. Linnstrument wins big here.

  • Linnstrument owner here. I have a LaunchPad X which convinced me that a pad-type controller would work for me, and the Linnstrument seemed like a logical step up.

    Downsides first...

    The cost is the big downside. It's a sizeable investment and you want to be confident that you're going to stick with it. That said, every now and then a secondhand one comes up for sale, and my impression is that they hold their value pretty well.

    The one thing that I feel is missing is some sort of knob controllers. You can do a lot with just pads, but most of the time I still want some knobs I can turn. You can configure the bottom row of pads as a "slider" to control a MIDI CC, but I personally don't find that comfortable to work with.

    Now for the upsides...

    Roger Linn himself is a great resource. The Linnstrument is his baby, and he makes himself very available to help when you have questions. You're not gonna get anything like that level of support for your Ableton controller.

    I love the tactile nature of touching pads vs something like Geoshred and similar controllers on the iPad. As much as I tried, I couldn't get the feeling of touching glass to create music to work for me.

    If you come from a guitar/bass/Stick background, then the 4ths tuning on the Linnstrument will be something you pick up very quickly. You can switch it to a guitar like 4ths+3rd tuning, or lots of other tunings in firmware - lots of people seem to like either 6 or 7 semitones (5ths) tuning, but the default 4ths works fine for me.

    Speaking of firmware, you can control just about everything on the Linnstrument from the Linnstrument itself. You really don't need anything else for live performance; you can quickly change any settings you might want to change on the Linnstrument.

    It's easy to learn a fairly small set of patterns to let you play chords with minimal thought. That comes in very handy when you're sitting in with other musicians and all you have is chord charts to work with. Once you pick up the chords, you can then start to add something a bit more spicy - however you can start contributing to a group of musicians pretty much straightaway once you get the basic patterns under your fingertips.

    Continuing on that point, if your particular group of musicians is lacking a drummer, or your bass player is sick that day, or you want to see how a song would sound if you added a sax, the Linnstrument is the perfect controller for those situations. In a group, you quickly become the person who can cover anything that the others can't. It's not like being a keyboard player with a big bank of sounds at their fingertips, but limited by the on-off nature of a keyboard; the tactile nature of the Linnstrument lets you come up with fairly realistic simulations of a lot of different instruments. If you like being a musical jack of all trades, the Linnstrument is the controller for you!

    Controlling SWAM instruments is especially good. With not a lot of experience, you can create a fairly convincing saxophone, violin, trumpet etc. - the Linnstrument is particularly good for controlling these. I'm not a saxophone player, but I can give a pretty good imitation of one in a mix.

    I've found that when learning other instruments/controllers, my progress hasn't been particularly smooth. I reach a certain level of competence, then I plateau at the level for quite a while, then I make a breakthrough that moves me up a level, then I plateau at that level, and so on. With the Linnstrument, it feels like I'm improving fairly steadily and every day I'm just a bit better than the day before. Others have commented how quickly my skills seem to be advancing, so it's (probably) not just my imagination.

    All the firmware for the Linnstrument is open source, meaning you can change it yourself if you know how to code. At some point MIDI 2.0 might replace MPE, and it's in your power to reconfigure your own Linnstrument to add any new features you might want. A few people have changed the firmware of the Linnstrument to meet their individual requirements, and shared their code around - the expertise is out there and people are keen to help. I'm comfortable that my Linnstrument isn't going to become useless over time, even if Roger Linn himself is no longer around to support it.

    The Linnstrument community is extremely supporting, kind of like the Audiobus forum. Yep there's a few people who might rub you up the wrong way occasionally, but I've never had a problem getting my questions answered or getting into engaging online discussions about various Linnstrument features. Don't underestimate the value of having a pool of online experts around to offer advice!

    Finally the decision between 128 pads and 200 pads...

    Once I decided to get a Linnstrument, I spent a lot of time weighing up which model to go with. I eventually went with the 200, but there's definitely a tradeoff between the 2. The 200 is a physically big thing to carry around and occupies a lot of space while you're playing it, while the 128 will fit into a laptop bag - if you're at all concerned with portability, then the 128 is pretty compelling. If I had a 128, I could fit everything I use (Linnstrument, cables, iPad) into a laptop bag, and I could effectively disappear in a crowd of people; with the 200 I've got it in a bag that really stands out because of the size and shape, plus I've got another bunch of stuff to carry around as well.

    Functionally the 2 models are identical (I think...), and the extra 72 pads on the 200 can be handy for playing with 2 hands - however, with the 4ths tuning that I use, you only get an extra 9 semitones of range. If I was playing lead-type lines with 1 hand, there's no question I'd get the 128; if you're playing with 2 hands, and using piano-type voicings, then the 200 is the better fit. If you're sitting in front of a DAW to create music, then the 128 is logistically a whole lot easier to work with - the 200 takes up a ton of desk space. Summing up, there's times when I wish I'd bought the 128, and other times where I'm grateful for the 200.

  • @monch1962 said:
    Linnstrument owner here. I have a LaunchPad X which convinced me that a pad-type controller would work for me, and the Linnstrument seemed like a logical step up.

    Downsides first...

    The cost is the big downside. It's a sizeable investment and you want to be confident that you're going to stick with it. That said, every now and then a secondhand one comes up for sale, and my impression is that they hold their value pretty well.

    The one thing that I feel is missing is some sort of knob controllers. You can do a lot with just pads, but most of the time I still want some knobs I can turn. You can configure the bottom row of pads as a "slider" to control a MIDI CC, but I personally don't find that comfortable to work with.

    Now for the upsides...

    Roger Linn himself is a great resource. The Linnstrument is his baby, and he makes himself very available to help when you have questions. You're not gonna get anything like that level of support for your Ableton controller.

    I love the tactile nature of touching pads vs something like Geoshred and similar controllers on the iPad. As much as I tried, I couldn't get the feeling of touching glass to create music to work for me.

    If you come from a guitar/bass/Stick background, then the 4ths tuning on the Linnstrument will be something you pick up very quickly. You can switch it to a guitar like 4ths+3rd tuning, or lots of other tunings in firmware - lots of people seem to like either 6 or 7 semitones (5ths) tuning, but the default 4ths works fine for me.

    Speaking of firmware, you can control just about everything on the Linnstrument from the Linnstrument itself. You really don't need anything else for live performance; you can quickly change any settings you might want to change on the Linnstrument.

    It's easy to learn a fairly small set of patterns to let you play chords with minimal thought. That comes in very handy when you're sitting in with other musicians and all you have is chord charts to work with. Once you pick up the chords, you can then start to add something a bit more spicy - however you can start contributing to a group of musicians pretty much straightaway once you get the basic patterns under your fingertips.

    Continuing on that point, if your particular group of musicians is lacking a drummer, or your bass player is sick that day, or you want to see how a song would sound if you added a sax, the Linnstrument is the perfect controller for those situations. In a group, you quickly become the person who can cover anything that the others can't. It's not like being a keyboard player with a big bank of sounds at their fingertips, but limited by the on-off nature of a keyboard; the tactile nature of the Linnstrument lets you come up with fairly realistic simulations of a lot of different instruments. If you like being a musical jack of all trades, the Linnstrument is the controller for you!

    Controlling SWAM instruments is especially good. With not a lot of experience, you can create a fairly convincing saxophone, violin, trumpet etc. - the Linnstrument is particularly good for controlling these. I'm not a saxophone player, but I can give a pretty good imitation of one in a mix.

    I've found that when learning other instruments/controllers, my progress hasn't been particularly smooth. I reach a certain level of competence, then I plateau at the level for quite a while, then I make a breakthrough that moves me up a level, then I plateau at that level, and so on. With the Linnstrument, it feels like I'm improving fairly steadily and every day I'm just a bit better than the day before. Others have commented how quickly my skills seem to be advancing, so it's (probably) not just my imagination.

    All the firmware for the Linnstrument is open source, meaning you can change it yourself if you know how to code. At some point MIDI 2.0 might replace MPE, and it's in your power to reconfigure your own Linnstrument to add any new features you might want. A few people have changed the firmware of the Linnstrument to meet their individual requirements, and shared their code around - the expertise is out there and people are keen to help. I'm comfortable that my Linnstrument isn't going to become useless over time, even if Roger Linn himself is no longer around to support it.

    The Linnstrument community is extremely supporting, kind of like the Audiobus forum. Yep there's a few people who might rub you up the wrong way occasionally, but I've never had a problem getting my questions answered or getting into engaging online discussions about various Linnstrument features. Don't underestimate the value of having a pool of online experts around to offer advice!

    Finally the decision between 128 pads and 200 pads...

    Once I decided to get a Linnstrument, I spent a lot of time weighing up which model to go with. I eventually went with the 200, but there's definitely a tradeoff between the 2. The 200 is a physically big thing to carry around and occupies a lot of space while you're playing it, while the 128 will fit into a laptop bag - if you're at all concerned with portability, then the 128 is pretty compelling. If I had a 128, I could fit everything I use (Linnstrument, cables, iPad) into a laptop bag, and I could effectively disappear in a crowd of people; with the 200 I've got it in a bag that really stands out because of the size and shape, plus I've got another bunch of stuff to carry around as well.

    Functionally the 2 models are identical (I think...), and the extra 72 pads on the 200 can be handy for playing with 2 hands - however, with the 4ths tuning that I use, you only get an extra 9 semitones of range. If I was playing lead-type lines with 1 hand, there's no question I'd get the 128; if you're playing with 2 hands, and using piano-type voicings, then the 200 is the better fit. If you're sitting in front of a DAW to create music, then the 128 is logistically a whole lot easier to work with - the 200 takes up a ton of desk space. Summing up, there's times when I wish I'd bought the 128, and other times where I'm grateful for the 200.

    Well then, because I make music at a desk, the 128 may be better for me. I have no issue with adjusting to 4ths instead of a piano-like layout, as long as I practice more.

  • edited March 2023

    Just to chime in… if you’re a guitarist/bass player the Linnstrument sounds ideal. If you’re a keyboard player take a look at OSMOSE. It has the same Haken sound engine, I believe. SweetWater has it preorder for $1800. I expect one in May. Only drawback is 49 keys but maybe Linnstrument is also limited?

  • edited March 2023

    I have collected several MPE controllers including a Linnstrument 200, a Seaboard Rise 2, Erae Touch, K-board Pro 4, Artiphon Instrument 1, Joue Play Pro and even a Lumi Keys I have yet to remove from its box—I might just sell it but it’s the only option with Bluetooth I think. I actually don’t use the Linnstrument much (have lent it to my dad who has Parkinson’s) because I had a hard time getting it to work the way I wanted with my various synths. I put a strap on mine and tried to treat it like a keytar (the Instrument 1 makes a better guitar controller). I’m a keyboard player with some guitar abilities so you’d think it would be perfect but it was too much like learning a whole new instrument. The K-board was the easiest transition to make, but I really miss the ability to slide. Not too portable either—the Joue and Lumi win there and on price too. I think the Seaboard is the ultimate MPE controller for me (until I can judge the Osmose at least) as I understand the layout intuitively and can make it do exactly what I want. YMMV. It’s big and beautiful and squishy and about the same cost as the Linn 200. If I had to do it again with the Linnstrument though, I think I would’ve found the Erae Touch a much more compelling and versatile (customizable layout FTW) option for 2/3 the cost. I even like the feel of that surface more. Only downside (or maybe not if you like pretty lights) is those LEDs are BRIGHT! I’m just saying that there are other options and while many people love the Linnstrument and I have nothing bad to say about Roger Linn, there might be others that work better for your personal style.

    Also, sometimes I just like playing on the iPad better than any of these, esp with apps like Thumbjam, Shoom, TC-11 (all IAA I know), Animoog and Geoshred. One thing that makes a nice difference is putting a paper-like screen protector on to give it some texture. I haven’t fallen in love with any MPE AUv3 controller apps yet (tho I have a few) but need to check out Woodtroller soon.

  • @Gavinski said:

    Some people rave about the linnstrument but I hear several main complaints:

    1. Some say it is hard to play the note on velocity predictably

    The velocity control has been improved by Geert and it is now really good (1 or 2 year ago I think?). On Ravenscroft, I can play extremely quiet like with no other midi controller.

  • Geert is the Midi Tape Recorder dev! Do u mean Roger Linn, the Linnstrument inventor?

  • First, I would say that you need to understand the difference between velocity and pressure sensitivity with MPE. Velocity is a measure of how hard a strike is, and is a single value that gets sent out when a key is first hit. This is not a strength of the Linnstrument, or really of any MPE controller. The mechanism of a good piano key is better for control over velocity (even over MPE controllers that use keys that look like piano keys). Pressure variation after the initial hit is one of the main things that controls expressivity on an MPE controller, which continuously sends out stream of pressure values until the key is released. Linnstrument implements this pressure variation quite well.

    The Linnstrument has a ton of flexibility for adjusting how it sends midi messages and interacts with synth hardware and software. My perception is that a lot of people who buy Linnstruments don't fully understand MPE and/or midi and don't adjust them to work optimally with their systems. Roger Linn is one of the architects of the MPE standard, and he's excellent at providing support for the Linnstrument personally. I think his design, knowledge, and support are one of the main reasons to buy a Linnstrument.

    Playing a piano-like instrument is not a strong suit of any MPE controller. The sound production of a piano key is generally determined by two things, the pitch of the key you hit, and the velocity you hit the key with. This means all the continuous variation provided by an MPE controller while the key is depressed (pressure variation, pitch variation, timbre variation) are of no use if all you want is to play a piano-like instrument. And since a good piano key is best solution out there for velocity, just playing a good piano keyboard will have better velocity sensitivity and generally be better choice, if all you want is a piano-like sound.

    Which isn't to say Linnstrument or other MPE controllers can't successfully play piano VST's. You can search youtube for lots of videos. They do fine.

    FWIW, here is a video that demonstrates control over light velocity touches on a Linnstrument:

  • heshes
    edited May 2023

    @Gavinski said:
    Geert is the Midi Tape Recorder dev! Do u mean Roger Linn, the Linnstrument inventor?

    Geert is also the author of the Linnstrument firmware, hired as consultant by Roger Linn. I said Roger Linn was one of the good reasons to have a Linnstrument; Geert is another. He's still working on the firmware, you can see latest firmware revisions were just added last week:
    https://github.com/rogerlinndesign/linnstrument-firmware/commits?author=gbevin

  • @Gavinski said:
    Geert is the Midi Tape Recorder dev! Do u mean Roger Linn, the Linnstrument inventor?

    I mean Geert the guy who helped Roger with the coding in the Linnstrument.

  • Geert Bevin, it's the same guy.

  • OK! Yeah I remember now actually, he also worked with moog from what I remember, maybe still does?

  • @Gavinski said:
    OK! Yeah I remember now actually, he also worked with moog from what I remember, maybe still does?

    Geert Bevin - Member of the Board of Directors
    Senior Software Engineer. Moog Music Inc. Apr 2015 - Present

  • @Gavinski said:
    Geert is the Midi Tape Recorder dev! Do u mean Roger Linn, the Linnstrument inventor?

    Geert wrote the Linnstrument software: https://www.rogerlinndesign.com/linnstrument

  • @Gavinski said:
    OK! Yeah I remember now actually, he also worked with moog from what I remember, maybe still does?

    A couple of years ago, he was Moog's head of software engineering. He might still be. MIDI Tape Recorder was written because nothing was doing Animoog Z justice.

Sign In or Register to comment.