Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Comments

  • Saw something similar on macrumours, likely from the same source. I'm not holding my breath but I am hopeful.

    There was talk of split screen workflows in ios8 at one point. That would certainly generate the need for more RAM but I haven't read much about it in several months. I thought the NDA was lifted on developers for iOS 8 so I figure we would have heard more about it by now if it was really coming. I might just be missing it.

  • ....An interesting read....I always though of multi tasking in a similar style to Korg Gadget.....ie: you could have a main app say Auria or Cubasis at the bottom or top and then a slide function or something for all your synth apps (ala Gadgets) at the other side in portrait mode....

  • edited August 2014

    If the new iPads don't have 2gb of ram, I feel no need to get one. Hopefully the rumors will turn out to be true. I think there is some reasonableness to the speculation that Apple held off on increasing the ram last fall so that there would be a reason for people to buy the new ones this time around. Can the dearth of new shiny music apps be related to developers gearing up for iOS 8 so that there's a smoother transition than from iOS 6 to iOS 7? If more integration with cloud based services is increasingly the way of the future, then have lots of storage on iOS devices will be less significant than increasing CPU, ram, and network connection speeds as well as handling the sharing of cloud based resources among apps/devices.

  • Glass half full! I heart it.

  • I prefer the mini retina and if the new one doesn't get the 2GB i would be very disappointed.I don't care about split multitasking though.

  • I think 99% of the "consumers" don't care about the ram. The only thing which seems to be a bit more public are the safari crashes because of the low ram. I also hope for 2GB in the iPhone 6 since i want to get that. No iPad for me this year, even if it has 2GB ram and splitscreen (too small for this). IOS 8 is still a smartphone OS and i will only buy another iPad when it has a real killer feature i can't imagine now or a more advances OS like an OS X light.

  • I don't care for split screen, I am doing multitasking on iPads since they exist, but more RAM is a carrot I'm going after. New mini retina with 2 gigs of RAM for me please, thanks.

  • edited August 2014

    2gb ram would be great, and I can see that the split screen would be useful, especially if there is a larger screen version of the iPad as well, that would be great for music apps as a larger playable surface, and also good for art apps. Ever hopeful!

  • A larger screen iPad is definitely an interesting proposition, as long as the weight is kept down.

  • If that iPad pro ever comes......? At the beginning i liked the idea of a bigger iPad but also not with iOS. Something like iOS pro maybe then. I also find even the light iPad Air too heavy after a while when holding it over my head. That rumored 5.5" iPhone (if it really comes) could be my all in one iOS solution. If just the developers of Sunrizer XS, Animoog and some Virsyn stuff had not abandoned this device. My personal choice is to just buy (again) only universal iOS apps in the future.

  • Sunrizer is not abandoned. Lat update was July, and it is now AB2 and IAA capable, ready for iOS 8.

  • @dwarman: I mean Sunrizer XS, the iPhone version.

  • 2Gb ram or I'm skipping. Also it's about time apple increased storage on the base model to 32Gb.

  • edited August 2014

    @supadom said:

    it's about time apple increased storage on the base model

    don't get me started on this.

    2GB ram + 32 GB storage would make sense. but sadly it seems Apple has left behind "top of the line hardware internals" as part of what makes up premium hardware by their definition.

  • Probably safe to say the internals are still basically top of the line, just not the largest capacities. It's just enough to keep, I'm guessing, 90% of their customers happy with their purchase. I want two gigs of ram (4!) but unless they introduce a general use feature that really needs it, I can't blame them for not wasting money. They're a business.

  • ^ True.

    It just used to be "wow, look what Apple have managed to do" every time they released a new version of iPod/Phone/Pad/Mac. I suppose that is still true, but for the number of generations of iPhones Apple has gone thru, I would have hoped that storage capacity would have been factored into the formula that sets apart iDevices as top of the line.

    I mean... how many years has 16GB been the base storage capacity? 3 generations or more? In my mind, the year iTunes started including HD video, Apple should have made iPads and iPhones minimum 64GB. Q: How many HD movies can you store on your 16GB iDevice? A: One, if you don't have too many photos, music, large apps installed. fail. :(

    (yes iCloud, syncing, cellular data all provide workarounds. But a premium device should not need workarounds!)

    /end rant

    I'm having loads of fun making music but, I think I'm just saying that Apple could be doing much more with hardware advances, and we would be way further along in capabilities for mobile music.

  • People use iPads to store a bunch of HD movies?

  • Yes. One per iPad, apparently.

  • edited August 2014

    ;-) no. and thats my point, we can't.

    A few years ago people stored their media on their devices, and consumed them whenever and wherever they wanted. Now "whenever, wherever" requires mobile data or wifi, and cloud storage or streaming subscriptions.

    I'm just admitting I never fully bought into the whole shift to "the cloud." I would prefer it as an option, not a necessity. And as a result, it means we have devices that are more limited for music.

  • Same movie, two iPads, one for each eye. Priceless!

  • @Hmtx said:

    ;-) no. and thats my point, we can't.

    A few years ago people stored their media on their devices, and consumed them whenever and wherever they wanted. Now "whenever, wherever" requires mobile data or wifi, and cloud storage or streaming subscriptions.

    I'm just admitting I never fully bought into the whole shift to "the cloud." I would prefer it as an option, not a necessity.

    The only time I ever needed to put movies on my ipad was to keep my daughter happy while on holidays. This is exactly when you can't use icloud and all internet based services unless you ready to dish out money on net connection abroad.

  • Oh, and iTunes doesn't even allow full HD downloads. The 5GB movie files are all 720p... for my retina iPad... so Premium

    and I'm totally done complaining now. Back to the regular positivity of the Audiobus forum. Sorry for the thread hijack.

  • Storage on a mobile device is expensive. Wifi is cheap. I get the point that at times one doesn't have a data connection and it's good to have some things stored locally, but to me that's a minor use.

Sign In or Register to comment.