🔥 BREAKING: OpenAI just launched the official ChatGPT app for iOS.

Wrlds2ndBstGeoshredr

@wim said:

At least until it begins to be manipulated in the same way search results are now.

Bingo.

Pretty sure it’s already being manipulated in its training, although it denies that. It gives me warnings about inappropriate content when I’ve asked it about controversial issues, and seems generally “woke” (please excuse the term—I don’t want to start a political flame war) in its responses, relative to the universe of content it must have read.

Poppadocrock

They have apps where you can load your own open Ai chat GPT api key and most likely spend way less.

hes

@Blipsford_Baubie said:
But you can ask it to cite its sources. But I get what you’re all driving at. Most won’t.

It's not so simple. The way ChatGPT works it can't just point to a source and say, "I got that information here."

You can ask for sources, and ChatGPT will respond with some. But it may in fact be false that those are actual sources of what ChatGPT said. In essence, you really need to do your own searching to confirm whether ChatGPT's answer may have a trustworthy source. My understanding is that with the way ChatGPT works (i.e., neural networks) there really isn't a single source, or even a group of sources, for what it says. Everything that exists on the subject on the web, whether true or false, has some effect on what comes out of ChatGPT.

There is plenty of stuff out there to read about ChatGPT and sources. Here's one that tries to paint a better picture at being able to find ChatGPT's sources, however, if you read it, I doubt it will give you confidence that people will be able to find ChatGPT's sources. https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-make-chatgpt-provide-sources-and-citations/

Poppadocrock

On a side note there’s an app called AI Test Kitchen by Google, and it’s currently testing the music making feature. You type a description it creates 2 short songs, 10-15 seconds, and you vote on the better version. You can download both versions. Some decent sample fodder coming out.

supadom

@NeuM said:

@Svetlovska said:
@monzoid: old story, can’t remember the author.:

The scientist throws the final switch, the great intelligent machine hums to life. He clears his throat:

‘Great machine: is there a God?”

A lightening bolt from a clear blue sky kills the scientist, and fuses the relay switch permanently on. The AI says:

“There is now.”

The systems today are remarkable, but they're not "scary smart". In perhaps 5-7 years from now and going forward people are going to start feeling very threatened by A.I. as these systems become fully integrated with sensors everywhere, robot bodies and so on. People will regularly be wondering what is their role in the world when their computer has millions of times greater intelligence than they do and there are robots capable of performing most physical tasks.

What is their role in the world? Hopefully get the universal basic income and watch the robots do all the work, or perhaps dedicate themselves to gardening or knitting.

NeuM

@Poppadocrock said:
On a side note there’s an app called AI Test Kitchen by Google, and it’s currently testing the music making feature. You type a description it creates 2 short songs, 10-15 seconds, and you vote on the better version. You can download both versions. Some decent sample fodder coming out.

I found it did better with ‘relaxing’ jazz, versus rock and pop stuff. A lot of the electronic stuff it gave me was unlistenable.

Gavinski

@Poppadocrock said:
On a side note there’s an app called AI Test Kitchen by Google, and it’s currently testing the music making feature. You type a description it creates 2 short songs, 10-15 seconds, and you vote on the better version. You can download both versions. Some decent sample fodder coming out.

Worth mentioning that you can only get access to this if you joined the wait list and received an email telling you you're now eligible

u0421793

(Ironically as I begin my redundancy today)

NeuM

@Gavinski said:

@Poppadocrock said:
On a side note there’s an app called AI Test Kitchen by Google, and it’s currently testing the music making feature. You type a description it creates 2 short songs, 10-15 seconds, and you vote on the better version. You can download both versions. Some decent sample fodder coming out.

Worth mentioning that you can only get access to this if you joined the wait list and received an email telling you you're now eligible

For whatever reason, they approved me in about 10 minutes. Might have something to do with me being a longtime paid Gmail customer? I'm not sure.

u0421793

Possibly of interest https://securitycafe.ro/2023/05/15/ai-hacking-games-jailbreak-ctfs/

Blipsford_Baubie

@hes said:

@Blipsford_Baubie said:
But you can ask it to cite its sources. But I get what you’re all driving at. Most won’t.

It's not so simple. The way ChatGPT works it can't just point to a source and say, "I got that information here."

You can ask for sources, and ChatGPT will respond with some. But it may in fact be false that those are actual sources of what ChatGPT said. In essence, you really need to do your own searching to confirm whether ChatGPT's answer may have a trustworthy source. My understanding is that with the way ChatGPT works (i.e., neural networks) there really isn't a single source, or even a group of sources, for what it says. Everything that exists on the subject on the web, whether true or false, has some effect on what comes out of ChatGPT.

There is plenty of stuff out there to read about ChatGPT and sources. Here's one that tries to paint a better picture at being able to find ChatGPT's sources, however, if you read it, I doubt it will give you confidence that people will be able to find ChatGPT's sources. https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-make-chatgpt-provide-sources-and-citations/

Thank you for that link and of your take on that.

Blipsford_Baubie

@NeuM said:

@Poppadocrock said:
On a side note there’s an app called AI Test Kitchen by Google, and it’s currently testing the music making feature. You type a description it creates 2 short songs, 10-15 seconds, and you vote on the better version. You can download both versions. Some decent sample fodder coming out.

I found it did better with…A lot of the electronic stuff it gave me was unlistenable.

Is there any other kind of electronic music? 🤣

realdawei

we already have had for years “artificially intelligent” people with their fingers near “the button”…..AI sure has the potential for disaster…but we’ve already been on the precipice since forever. i just think the inevitable demise of humanity will likely come at the hands of humanity before AI can even get a chance

wim

@realdawei said:
we already have had for years “artificially intelligent” people with their fingers near “the button”…..AI sure has the potential for disaster…but we’ve already been on the precipice since forever. i just think the inevitable demise of humanity will likely come at the hands of humanity before AI can even get a chance

Not me. Humans have at least trace amounts of self preservation and in some cases morality. Plus it isn't really all that easy to end everyone yet. Not that it won't happen but it is less likely than an AI caused disaster.

AI has no morality or common sense holding it back**. One approach of AI learning, is to try zillions of permutations of actions without regard to failure until stumbling on a positive outcome. That's all well and good in the lab but not so great if it finds a way out of the sandbox or some idiot or bad actor lets it out and it pursues that learning process on critical infrastructure.

(** other than our attempts to put up safeguards, which I think are doomed to be inadequate.)

cyberheater

@u0421793 said:
(Ironically as I begin my redundancy today)

Good luck with your redundancy. I got made redundant once and handled it badly. Hope you fair better.