Time Magazine June cover. The End of Humanity (A.I).

cyberheater

Any company that is deeply involved with the development of AI can’t turn it off for fear they will lose their competitive advantage and market share.

knewspeak

@cyberheater said:
Any company that is deeply involved with the development of AI can’t turn it off for fear they will lose their competitive advantage and market share.

That’s it, in a nutshell.

rheslip

@knewspeak said:

@cyberheater said:
Any company that is deeply involved with the development of AI can’t turn it off for fear they will lose their competitive advantage and market share.

That’s it, in a nutshell.

And in the headlong rush to bring the next big thing to market they are not putting proper safety measures in place. Running like hell to make profits at the expense of all of us.

cyberheater

@rheslip said:

@knewspeak said:

@cyberheater said:
Any company that is deeply involved with the development of AI can’t turn it off for fear they will lose their competitive advantage and market share.

That’s it, in a nutshell.

And in the headlong rush to bring the next big thing to market they are not putting proper safety measures in place. Running like hell to make profits at the expense of all of us.

And in the headlong pursuit more and more jobs will get irreversible replaced by AI. Millions of office jobs gone.

knewspeak

@cyberheater said:

@rheslip said:

@knewspeak said:

@cyberheater said:
Any company that is deeply involved with the development of AI can’t turn it off for fear they will lose their competitive advantage and market share.

That’s it, in a nutshell.

And in the headlong rush to bring the next big thing to market they are not putting proper safety measures in place. Running like hell to make profits at the expense of all of us.

And in the headlong pursuit more and more jobs will get irreversible replaced by AI. Millions of office jobs gone.

Who knows what’s planned for the surplus workforce, although the mantra is ‘don’t worry new jobs will take the place of lost ones’, maybe but I foresee a lot of downsizing.

rheslip

@knewspeak said:

@cyberheater said:

@rheslip said:

@knewspeak said:

@cyberheater said:
Any company that is deeply involved with the development of AI can’t turn it off for fear they will lose their competitive advantage and market share.

That’s it, in a nutshell.

And in the headlong rush to bring the next big thing to market they are not putting proper safety measures in place. Running like hell to make profits at the expense of all of us.

And in the headlong pursuit more and more jobs will get irreversible replaced by AI. Millions of office jobs gone.

Who knows what’s planned for the surplus workforce, although the mantra is ‘don’t worry new jobs will take the place of lost ones’, maybe but I foresee a lot of downsizing.

Send everybody home and print a few more trillion to keep the economy afloat for a while longer. That worked ok for Covid, didn’t it? And we all saw that one coming because we were warned by Bill Gates.

Blipsford_Baubie

@AudioGus said:

@GrimLucky said:

Could be when it costs billions of dollars and becomes the foundation of a company that simply turning it off becomes a problem. I mean companies already would rather do payouts for whoopsies than fix them in many cases. Car manufacturers factor payouts for kids heads crushed by airbags into development budgets already etc. If we get AIs talking to each other like virtual lobbyists, judges and ceos it is pretty easy to imagine all sorts of 20th century styled dehumanized machine horror etc etc oh god why edibles in the morning!?

🤣🤣 @ your last question.

robosardine

Only Ange Postecoglou can save us.