Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
Try Google Bard instead. It’s a solid service. I even asked it to write some jokes in other languages for me… it’s great stuff.
But no matter what you use these for you have to double-check the work, just in case they’re “lying” to you.
I use it nearly every day. Book summaries, travel itineraries, exploratory data analytics, comparison charts, general search engine questions. The fact that you can follow up and clarify what you’re after is really helpful. It lies through its teeth of course so you have to be on your toes.
mostly for coding (both directly Chat and GitHub Copilot plugin in my IDE, Copilot uses GPT api). It’s GREAT tool, saves me literally hours of coding every week, i can do most of stuff in less than half of time than before without it …
For examole it’s absolutely fantastic for complex RegEx-esn(devs will know) but often amazes me how deeply it undeestand what i am trying to do and it iffees me autocomplete of snippets of code which often perfectly fit to my intention .. iťs almost like magic
Yup for common question it’s better in most cases, for coding GPT is waaaay much better, geneeates much more relevant and bug-less code.
solitaire tabletop roleplaying.
Hmm, I just tried Bard. The wife and I are planning a hedge in our garden so I asked for tips on what plant to get and got pretty interesting answers...
Maybe there is something to all this AI stuff...
You’ve conducted head-to-head coding comparisons, I take it? I mean, of course you have.
Yeah of course .. also my colleague .. we got same results, GPT is much better.. more optimalised code and less bugs
Oh, yeah. There’s almost no area of inquiry that cannot be addressed with the right questions. And if you’re not sure how or what you should be asking, it can help you out there too!
Try this one… Describe a few food ingredients in your household and then ask it for recipe suggestions. Mind blowing.
I would rather not divulge anything about my relationship with chatgpt, thanks.
Worry not, our imaginations are also endless machines...
Oh, now you've done it. You've besmirched the honor of Chat GPT.
I have used it to work make up some funny short stories based on some facts about real people I know in certain groups. Give it rough ideas for a story, tell it you want the story to be funny, the results are sometimes hilarious
Some great ideas there!
More than a few times I've been completely knocked off my feet with the 'creative' responses from these tools. People are going to quickly feel like machine learning systems are essential to getting things done. Just like having a personal assistant.
I've tried the free ChatGPT for some trivial coding stuff. My very first use of ChatGPT was actually to see if it could program in Mozaic. I'd seen someone have decent results using Reaper's proprietary ReaperScript language and was curious if it could use Mozaic at all. I knew the free ChatGPT's knowledge was cut off from anything after September 2021, but gave it a try anyway.
It then included a numbered list of items that were how to install and use Mozaic. I didn't read it closely (if I had I would have realized some of it was flat out wrong); I was just impressed that it knew anything at all about this and pressed onward.
I asked it it had read the Mozaic user manual. It said, "As an AI language model, I don't have direct access to my training data or know where it came from. However, I was trained on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. . . "
So I said I had a github repository with a bunch of Mozaic scripts and asked if it could read and analyze them to learn about the Mozaic language:
This time I looked more closely at the script. It didn't appear to look like what I knew as Mozaic code.
The new script was still in Javascript. I continued for a bit to see if it could generate Mozaic code.
I pressed on a tiny bit longer before I gave up, having learned quite a bit about ChatGPT in my first experience with it.
Mostly I learned that ChatGPT can sound quite confident while it's spitting out absolute garbage rattletrap responses. So you have to be careful with it.
I also learned that ChatGPT mimics some human responses emotionally, for example apologizes when you point out that it's feeding you bad information. This has the strange effect of making you feel bad for pointing out errors, because it's only natural to get a bit peeved when it's flat out wrong after it confidently says, "Certainly! Here's your answer for that!" Then you realize that you're getting mad at a machine that doesn't know any better, which makes you feel kind of bad yourself for getting mad at ChatGPT. Definitely an irrational response, but an emotional one that I expect is natural.
I should say that I have had good experiences with ChatGPT after I've learned better how to use it, and what sorts of things it's good for and what it's not good for. It has been helpful for examples of Arduino code, or even just in answer to questions about how the world of Arduino and associated electronics works.
I asked it for an explanation of what 'Djent drumming' was, and it gave a helpful synopsis, arguably better for my purposes than what I got from Wikipedia. I think I mostly use it as kind of an alternative or supplement to Wikipedia, to get an overview of a topic. But I trust ChatGPT far less than I trust Wikipedia.
Ha, yes, yes, yes.
. Lack of reliability is not a good trait for a service like ChatGPT. Seems quite strange to me that tendency seems to be to give it somewhat of a pass on this.
I use it for creative brainstorming. 95% of it is pretty average mundane stuff but it does inevitably hit on novel combinations and can make quick concise lists that are easy to tear through.
I’m still fond of IA Rap Generator’s takes on 15th and 17th century European history.
I smell a Pulitzer!
pretty much for everything, its part of my life now just like the internet/youtube.
Now… never thought about using it for regex. As much as I love complex regex after decades, anything to make it easier would be good. Nice one!
Excellent! That is fantastic.
I used to have to write 2 page summaries of these ridiculous case studies, and I created a template of all the common verbiage surrounding the findings, and I would just plug in the particular findings into my template.
It took 10 minutes to write each summary, and that was still 9 more minutes than each deserved.
ChatGPT would have saved me those 9 minutes.
I have had the same reaction.
Also, I think you are correct about their soon-to-be indispensability.
I think most people still vastly underestimate the humongous impact that GPT and related technologies will have on all areas of society.
I can only agree with some of the posters here in that I basically use it "for everything". I'm not dumb myself, but I get little sleep and peace recently so my brain is fried most of the time, so I need to "offload" intelligence-related stuff. Also, GPT has the additional advantage of having basically all of mankind's knowledge (although in a fuzzy form) in it.
It might not seem that revolutionary for "trivial" stuff, but try coming up with a solution to the following problem in 5 seconds by merely googling:
Or this:
Both of these I'd say are very hard to Google. GPT-4 immediately understood both and provided a full optimized solution, along with comprehensive explanations, in seconds.
(they're both actual problems I had to solve in my day job recently).
I agree that the "10 divisions" problem could be considered trivial if you know a bit of math, but then again, my brain is fried!
Yeah, tremendous time saver... it made for me problably 10-15 regexes in last month a single one wasn't any wrong, they work just perfect ..
A while back I had asked it to compose something for in Lilypond format, but it did not work. I don’t doubt that it might eventually be able to, or maybe another AI specializing in music.
How do I get GPT-4? In the app it’s 3.5 and stuck in September 2021. I’d like it to be absolutely current and up to date. For example I’d like to ask it about things relevant to my local area and current but I guess it can’t do that? What am I missing?
GPT-4 requires a Plus subscription.
Both models' knowledge is limited to until September 2021. But that doesn't really matter. GPT's strength is understanding and solving problems, not so much replacing a search engine (if you depend on absolutely current information).
Ok got it. So there’s no way to get an AI that’s connected to the internet? I tried Bings AI but it sort of goes back and forth between answering the question as asked or doing a search engine search with words taken out of context from your question. I found it very frustrating