Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Looking for a Bluetooth midi keyboard or grid controller. Dig the xKeyAir, but...

2»

Comments

  • @bluegroove said:
    2.) Playing surface is great for non MPE instruments. 90% of the time I'm running Pianoteq, and combining with various things and it's lovely.

    Now this is really amazing. Key velocity and key "force" (or pressure) are both so important when playing an acoustic piano. I find it almost impossible to play decent acoustic piano on the Xkey despite its support for custom velocity curves and some (minimal) key travel. Heck, I find it hard on a full-size keyboard with unweighted synth action. I've tried it on the Keith McMillen MPE controllers and it was a mess. Your ability to use Pianoteq on a Joue is really impressive.

  • @Gavinski said:

    @bluegroove said:

    @Gavinski said:
    @bluegroove another thing I would ask about the Joue would be whether you have run into problems with things like stuck notes, keys/pads sometimes not responding etc. I had these kinds of problems with both the Sensel Morph and the Roli Seaboard, and found these problems so tedious that they completely killed my love for them. I saw some ppl mentioning problems like these in online reviews, which is a huge red flag for me. I just want something that's always going to work as expected, unless it actually breaks. Is this really so much to ask 😂?

    No I've never had any stuck notes in almost a full year of use, every night for multi hour jam sessions.

    I think you've given me gas for that Joue haha. It looks to me that, although all the surfaces are gorgeous, they're not really necessary. I just want to check if I understand correctly:

    If you pay for the pro upgrade you could then assign any pad in a controller to send basically any kind of midi messages, is that right?

    So, for example, if I bought the 'Keys' surface, could I keep all the pads for notes, except for one which I could then assign to, say, a particular midi cc?

    And on the ones with notes can you set them all up to respond to per note pitch bend, pressure and cc74?if so, I think I would maybe get away with getting just 1 or 2 surfaces, for example the 'Guitar' one and the 'Keys' one mentioned above.

    I would still be left with the problem of getting delivery to Thailand, as it seems there are no sellers in this region and Joué also don't even ship here. But yes, it's almost exactly what I'm looking for, apart from not being Bluetooth. I don't have much stuff at the moment, so if I fork out for a new controller I kind of want it to be the sort of thing I could really fall in love with. This looks like it would be a good candidate for that!

    You can definitely set the notes all up to respond to per note pitch bend, pressure and cc74, and iirc this is actually the default setting.

    In regards to assigning midi cc to notes, I think so, but I am going to hook it up to my desktop today and get back to you on this as, like I said, I've really only done that once a year ago and haven't needed to mess with the custom stuff since then.

  • edited December 2023

    @jamietopol said:

    @bluegroove said:
    2.) Playing surface is great for non MPE instruments. 90% of the time I'm running Pianoteq, and combining with various things and it's lovely.

    Now this is really amazing. Key velocity and key "force" (or pressure) are both so important when playing an acoustic piano. I find it almost impossible to play decent acoustic piano on the Xkey despite its support for custom velocity curves and some (minimal) key travel. Heck, I find it hard on a full-size keyboard with unweighted synth action. I've tried it on the Keith McMillen MPE controllers and it was a mess. Your ability to use Pianoteq on a Joue is really impressive.

    I should probably put a disclaimer here and say that I'm not a "professional" piano player and I actually learned to play on synth keys so I am not a qualified judge of acoustic pianos. However, I find the Joue to be adequate for practicing, jamming, and learning/writing new songs. However someone with higher piano standards most likely would not. As a flat surface, obviously it has no physical "key travel" whatsoever, but the touch and pressure response is decent, and better than other such controllers I've tried (K-Board C, Roli Block, etc.).

    While I use the sound of real piano in just about everything I do, where the Joue really shines is when you start layering in synths with aftertouch or cc74 control as that is where the expression really shines. It's lovely for swam instruments as well.

    Bottom line is it kinda goes without saying that it doesn't feel like a real piano, but good enough for me and my bedroom jams/practice.

  • @bluegroove said:

    @jamietopol said:

    @bluegroove said:
    2.) Playing surface is great for non MPE instruments. 90% of the time I'm running Pianoteq, and combining with various things and it's lovely.

    Now this is really amazing. Key velocity and key "force" (or pressure) are both so important when playing an acoustic piano. I find it almost impossible to play decent acoustic piano on the Xkey despite its support for custom velocity curves and some (minimal) key travel. Heck, I find it hard on a full-size keyboard with unweighted synth action. I've tried it on the Keith McMillen MPE controllers and it was a mess. Your ability to use Pianoteq on a Joue is really impressive.

    I should probably put a disclaimer here and say that I'm not a "professional" piano player and I actually learned to play on synth keys so I am not the best judge of acoustic pianos. However, I find the Joue to be adequate for practicing, jamming, and learning/writing new songs. However someone with higher piano standards most likely would not. As a flat surface, obviously it has no physical "key action" whatsoever, but the touch and pressure response is decent, and better than other such controllers I've tried (K-Board, Roli Block, etc.).

    Bottom line is it kinda goes without saying that it doesn't feel like a real piano, but good enough for me.

    Jamie’s comment earlier made me pull out the Sensel Morph again today and have a go at playing a Pianoteq piano with that. I really struggled with getting smooth changes in velocity. Sometimes if I played softly I just got no sound, at other times I got suddenly much louder velocity than I was expecting. I don’t currently have access to the desktop software for that to check whether any adjustments I could make would make it feel better to me. But I do remember that even when I did have access to that software and played around with settings quite a bit, I just never managed to get along with the Morph. I always wondered whether I had a faulty unit or it just wasn’t a great controller, or if it just wasn’t the right fit for me. But yeah, it’s making me think twice about getting another similarly flat-surfaced controller. I find, for example, that I can actually play a Pianoteq Piano with massively more expression and control right on the iPad screen, using an app like Xequence AU Keys and just using the y axis to dial in the needed velocity. I’m able to predict so much better how to play to get the desired velocity than with the Morph. Playing with the morph today also reminded me of how annoying it can be to be stuck with just 2 octaves of range at a given time. Yes, you can adjust the octaves etc but it’s not the same. This is another advantage of apps like AU Keys - you have so much control over these things than with a mini controller. So now I’m wondering whether the xkeys air would also be an unsatisfying experience, haha! Of course the iPad screen is also not perfect. You miss that tactile feeling and you have to use your eyes more. Urghh…

  • I'm curious what you land on. I've finally ordered a nanokey studio, because I want to be able to roam around the house, or just not be tied to my desk - and be able to play on something other than the screen.
    At the desk, I really like the Keystep 37 with midifighter knobs, but it takes a couple of minutes to setup, needs cables, adapters and power, and sometimes it's more fun just to get started with something immediate. I like that the nanokey has an XY pad, which saves some trouble running a separate app for that. Also scales, arps and pads. Plus it basically begs to be used with Gadget, which is my favorite iOS music maker app.
    Sure it's plasticky, expensive (for what it is), needs desktop setup software and the knobs jump in intervals of 2, but it's fun and easy - which is invaluable. I hope it'll live up to my expectation. I also hope you find something better, so I can regret my purchase and start looking forward to something else :wink:

  • edited December 2023

    I have "original" M-Vave SMK25 Mini for several weeks. There are 2 things I don't like:

    • Tension of keys is low
    • It is impossible to get maximum value (127) on C1-C3 velocity presets. C4 is fixed to 127.
      I worked around that with Mozaic script. Internal battery is OK, no other issues.
  • wimwim
    edited December 2023

    @Gavinski said:

    @bluegroove said:

    @jamietopol said:

    @bluegroove said:
    2.) Playing surface is great for non MPE instruments. 90% of the time I'm running Pianoteq, and combining with various things and it's lovely.

    Now this is really amazing. Key velocity and key "force" (or pressure) are both so important when playing an acoustic piano. I find it almost impossible to play decent acoustic piano on the Xkey despite its support for custom velocity curves and some (minimal) key travel. Heck, I find it hard on a full-size keyboard with unweighted synth action. I've tried it on the Keith McMillen MPE controllers and it was a mess. Your ability to use Pianoteq on a Joue is really impressive.

    I should probably put a disclaimer here and say that I'm not a "professional" piano player and I actually learned to play on synth keys so I am not the best judge of acoustic pianos. However, I find the Joue to be adequate for practicing, jamming, and learning/writing new songs. However someone with higher piano standards most likely would not. As a flat surface, obviously it has no physical "key action" whatsoever, but the touch and pressure response is decent, and better than other such controllers I've tried (K-Board, Roli Block, etc.).

    Bottom line is it kinda goes without saying that it doesn't feel like a real piano, but good enough for me.

    Jamie’s comment earlier made me pull out the Sensel Morph again today and have a go at playing a Pianoteq piano with that. I really struggled with getting smooth changes in velocity. Sometimes if I played softly I just got no sound, at other times I got suddenly much louder velocity than I was expecting. I don’t currently have access to the desktop software for that to check whether any adjustments I could make would make it feel better to me. But I do remember that even when I did have access to that software and played around with settings quite a bit, I just never managed to get along with the Morph. I always wondered whether I had a faulty unit or it just wasn’t a great controller, or if it just wasn’t the right fit for me. But yeah, it’s making me think twice about getting another similarly flat-surfaced controller. I find, for example, that I can actually play a Pianoteq Piano with massively more expression and control right on the iPad screen, using an app like Xequence AU Keys and just using the y axis to dial in the needed velocity. I’m able to predict so much better how to play to get the desired velocity than with the Morph. Playing with the morph today also reminded me of how annoying it can be to be stuck with just 2 octaves of range at a given time. Yes, you can adjust the octaves etc but it’s not the same. This is another advantage of apps like AU Keys - you have so much control over these things than with a mini controller. So now I’m wondering whether the xkeys air would also be an unsatisfying experience, haha! Of course the iPad screen is also not perfect. You miss that tactile feeling and you have to use your eyes more. Urghh…

    The Morph can't handle MPE over Bluetooth for shit. The problems you were having sound exactly like those I faced. It worked OK in non MPE mode or over USB. But it still was unsatisfying. Had to pound on the keys even at the highest sensitivity settings.

    You should see the worst of the problems go away if you use the Morph over USB though.

  • The Morph can't handle MPE over Bluetooth for shit. The problems you were having sound exactly like those I faced. It worked OK in non MPE mode or over USB. But it still was unsatisfying. Had to pound on the keys even at the highest sensitivity settings.

    You should see the worst of the problems go away if you use the Morph over USB though.

    This is a good point. MPE requires much more data relative to "traditional" MIDI and I suppose it could strain the limits of Bluetooth. Even aftertouch requires more data.

    In a related topic, I remember many people complained about stuck notes when using SynthMaster and I had these problems too until I disabled aftertouch on my keyboard and then I never had a stuck SynthMaster note again.

  • @jamietopol said:

    This is a good point. MPE requires much more data relative to "traditional" MIDI and I suppose it could strain the limits of Bluetooth. Even aftertouch requires more data.

    There are other MPE controllers that are able to work over Bluetooth, though I agree it can be a lot of data to have to deal with. Sadly, it was just a poor implementation by Sensel. They never were able staff up enough on the development side. I had high hopes for the Morph, but it disappointed on many levels. Oh well. 🤷🏼‍♂️

    In a related topic, I remember many people complained about stuck notes when using SynthMaster and I had these problems too until I disabled aftertouch on my keyboard and then I never had a stuck SynthMaster note again.

    Good to know!

  • I came across another option yesterday...
    The (2nd generation) Carry-on Folding Controller 49.
    https://carryonplaying.com/product/carry-on-folding-controller/

    Andertons Music (UK) carries it (99 GBP), but in the US, it looks like all retailers are only selling the "1st gen" version that lacks velocity-sensitive keys.

  • @jamietopol said:
    I came across another option yesterday...
    The (2nd generation) Carry-on Folding Controller 49.
    https://carryonplaying.com/product/carry-on-folding-controller/

    Andertons Music (UK) carries it (99 GBP), but in the US, it looks like all retailers are only selling the "1st gen" version that lacks velocity-sensitive keys.

    That’s absolutely wild. Velocity is not tested very seriously in this video, but I will definitely look at other reviews. 49 key one looks very interesting

  • @Gavinski said:

    @jamietopol said:
    I came across another option yesterday...
    The (2nd generation) Carry-on Folding Controller 49.
    https://carryonplaying.com/product/carry-on-folding-controller/

    Andertons Music (UK) carries it (99 GBP), but in the US, it looks like all retailers are only selling the "1st gen" version that lacks velocity-sensitive keys.

    That’s absolutely wild. Velocity is not tested very seriously in this video, but I will definitely look at other reviews. 49 key one looks very interesting

    Mmm, not available in my current country, typical!

  • @jamietopol said:
    I came across another option yesterday...
    The (2nd generation) Carry-on Folding Controller 49.
    https://carryonplaying.com/product/carry-on-folding-controller/

    That’s absolutely wild. Velocity is not tested very seriously in this video, but I will definitely look at other reviews. 49 key one looks very interesting

    Mmm, not available in my current country, typical!

    There is another version available (re-branded?) sold by MidiPlus.
    https://www.midi.org/component/zoo/item/midiplus-vboard-50
    Jeremy See review:

  • @jamietopol said:

    @jamietopol said:
    I came across another option yesterday...
    The (2nd generation) Carry-on Folding Controller 49.
    https://carryonplaying.com/product/carry-on-folding-controller/

    That’s absolutely wild. Velocity is not tested very seriously in this video, but I will definitely look at other reviews. 49 key one looks very interesting

    Mmm, not available in my current country, typical!

    There is another version available (re-branded?) sold by MidiPlus.
    https://www.midi.org/component/zoo/item/midiplus-vboard-50
    Jeremy See review:

    Thnx! Have not watched that but looked at the web page. No mention of it being velocity sensitive there, I noticed

  • There is another version available (re-branded?) sold by MidiPlus.
    https://www.midi.org/component/zoo/item/midiplus-vboard-50
    Jeremy See review:

    Thnx! Have not watched that but looked at the web page. No mention of it being velocity sensitive there, I noticed

    Instruction manual available here: http://m.midiplus.com/upload/202201/20/Vboard 49 User Manual V1.0.pdf
    It mentions velocity sensitivity.

  • edited December 2023

    @jamietopol said:

    There is another version available (re-branded?) sold by MidiPlus.
    https://www.midi.org/component/zoo/item/midiplus-vboard-50
    Jeremy See review:

    Thnx! Have not watched that but looked at the web page. No mention of it being velocity sensitive there, I noticed

    Instruction manual available here: http://m.midiplus.com/upload/202201/20/Vboard 49 User Manual V1.0.pdf
    It mentions velocity sensitivity.

    Bizarrely btw, the video description on the Youtube vid you shared above links to a totally different keyboard using this hyperlink https://geni.us/vLuwO

    Must be out of stock I guess

  • It mentions velocity sensitivity.

    Bizarrely btw, the video description on the Youtube vid you shared above links to a totally different keyboard using this hyperlink https://geni.us/vLuwO

    Must be out of stock I guess

    That is the old "1st generation" version of the keyboard. It has 128 built-in sounds (poor-quality general MIDI sounds), 2 tiny speakers, and keys with no velocity sensitivity. This is not worth purchasing (in my opinion).
    The new version is a true MIDI controller keyboard. It even has a touch-strip for pitch bend and mod wheel.

  • The micro usb connection on the X Keys use to be terrible not sure if they improved. First part to fail.

  • @jamietopol said:

    It mentions velocity sensitivity.

    Bizarrely btw, the video description on the Youtube vid you shared above links to a totally different keyboard using this hyperlink https://geni.us/vLuwO

    Must be out of stock I guess

    That is the old "1st generation" version of the keyboard. It has 128 built-in sounds (poor-quality general MIDI sounds), 2 tiny speakers, and keys with no velocity sensitivity. This is not worth purchasing (in my opinion).
    The new version is a true MIDI controller keyboard. It even has a touch-strip for pitch bend and mod wheel.

    Yes, was not able to see a 49 key 2nd gen version of the one you posted for sale online where I am currently. If the velocity sensitivity is good, it looks like a killer portable keyboard.

  • @Jumpercollins said:
    The micro usb connection on the X Keys use to be terrible not sure if they improved. First part to fail.

    They did make improvements. I had an early Xkey and agree with your opinion. I have a newer "air" version and it was fixed.

  • I purchased the folding 49-key MIDI controller. I wrote a description and posted some pictures here: https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/59073/folding-49-key-midi-controller-carry-on-folding-controller-49#latest

  • @Gavinski said:
    I'm looking for a midi keyboard recommendation. Maybe a keyboard, maybe a grid controller.

    The 25 key cme xkey air really appeals to me but I don't know if I could tolerate those clicking noises from the keys. I've also heard stories of connection issues.

    These are my requirements:

    Does not require desktop software (rules out things like Sensel Morph)

    Light, slim, minimalist (hence the appeal of the xkey air)

    Very portable (must be small and rugged enough to throw in a bag without worrying about it, I spend a lot of time outside, again the xkey air seems quite good in that regard)

    Nice build quality (Korg Nano stuff feels and looks cheap, not what I'm looking for)

    Quiet (no loud noises while pressing keys)

    Bluetooth, and no connection issues (heard complaints about xkey reliability over Bluetooth)

    Just want a keyboard, don't need knobs, pads etc (I already have a nanokontrol studio)

    No need for full size keys, though I wouldn't want something super tiny like the OffGrid

    The look and feel are really important to me, must be super portable but also be a beautiful object.

    MPE (or poly aftertouch) would be great, but something like the Seaboard is not suited to normal piano playing. The Sensel Morph needs desktop access to switch between normal and mpe modes, so isn't suitable. I need a controller that, if it is mpe, must also function well for non mpe instruments.

    Suitable for playing with eyes closed (the piano style overlay of the Sensel Morph, for example, is less than ideal in this regard as it is so flat). One of the main reasons I want to use an actual keyboard rather than a keyboard app is so I can rest my fatigued eyes.

    Thnx!

    What was the outcome of your search?

Sign In or Register to comment.