Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Comments

  • Wonder how music app developers feel about this Ai trend?

  • edited March 31

    @Simon said:
    Wonder how music app developers feel about this Ai trend?

    Yeah

  • I've already booked my spot under the bridge so I'm grand ☺️

  • edited March 31

    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

  • @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

    For a starter it would make sense to pass legislation that AI generated media have to be identified as such.
    As a non-commercial musician, who plays for fun and self-therapy, AI does not bother me much, but I fully understand the concerns.
    My main concern with AI is that it get's more and more difficult to identify AI generated media. I sadly see people's perception getting more and more confused. On one hand blindly taking everything they hear or see on the media for the truth, on the other rejecting long established scientific facts as AI generated fakes.

  • @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

    As a non-commercial musician, who plays for fun and self-therapy, AI does not bother me much, but I fully understand the concerns.

    Yes I don't produce music commercially anymore either. But it's hard to ignore for anyone who does. But as I say, maybe they'll just make commercial usage of AI-generated music (or any kind of content) illegal or something to protect society ("jobs"). (I would actually kinda understand this! Although it would be better to just accept that humans will have to work far less in the future, which is basically a good thing. Obviously society will have to be properly "fine-tuned" for that, a monumental task that I don't entrust the current politicians with at all. So maybe better go the "ban" route.)

    My main concern with AI is that it get's more and more difficult to identify AI generated media. I sadly see people's perception getting more and more confused. On one hand blindly taking everything they hear or see on the media for the truth, on the other rejecting long established scientific facts as AI generated fakes.

    Well, people blindly trusting the media is nothing new, and there's no AI required to generate fake or manipulative content. It just makes it far easier 🥴

  • edited March 31

    @SevenSystems said:

    @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

    As a non-commercial musician, who plays for fun and self-therapy, AI does not bother me much, but I fully understand the concerns.

    Yes I don't produce music commercially anymore either. But it's hard to ignore for anyone who does. But as I say, maybe they'll just make commercial usage of AI-generated music (or any kind of content) illegal or something to protect society ("jobs"). (I would actually kinda understand this! Although it would be better to just accept that humans will have to work far less in the future, which is basically a good thing. Obviously society will have to be properly "fine-tuned" for that, a monumental task that I don't entrust the current politicians with at all. So maybe better go the "ban" route.)

    My main concern with AI is that it get's more and more difficult to identify AI generated media. I sadly see people's perception getting more and more confused. On one hand blindly taking everything they hear or see on the media for the truth, on the other rejecting long established scientific facts as AI generated fakes.

    Well, people blindly trusting the media is nothing new, and there's no AI required to generate fake or manipulative content. It just makes it far easier 🥴

    All very well said. And I agree that the current "meritocratic" system that puts financial rewards for work at it's centre is a major problem. But I'm not sure if banning AI would work. We had it before:
    https://musicradar.com/news/the-union-passed-a-motion-to-ban-the-use-of-synths-drum-machines-and-any-electronic-devices-the-day-the-loony-musicians-union-tried-to-kill-the-synthesizer-which-also-happened-to-be-bob-moogs-birthday

  • @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:

    @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

    As a non-commercial musician, who plays for fun and self-therapy, AI does not bother me much, but I fully understand the concerns.

    Yes I don't produce music commercially anymore either. But it's hard to ignore for anyone who does. But as I say, maybe they'll just make commercial usage of AI-generated music (or any kind of content) illegal or something to protect society ("jobs"). (I would actually kinda understand this! Although it would be better to just accept that humans will have to work far less in the future, which is basically a good thing. Obviously society will have to be properly "fine-tuned" for that, a monumental task that I don't entrust the current politicians with at all. So maybe better go the "ban" route.)

    My main concern with AI is that it get's more and more difficult to identify AI generated media. I sadly see people's perception getting more and more confused. On one hand blindly taking everything they hear or see on the media for the truth, on the other rejecting long established scientific facts as AI generated fakes.

    Well, people blindly trusting the media is nothing new, and there's no AI required to generate fake or manipulative content. It just makes it far easier 🥴

    All very well said. And I agree that the current "meritocratic" system that puts financial rewards for work at it's centre is a major problem. But I'm not sure if banning AI would work. We had it before:
    https://musicradar.com/news/the-union-passed-a-motion-to-ban-the-use-of-synths-drum-machines-and-any-electronic-devices-the-day-the-loony-musicians-union-tried-to-kill-the-synthesizer-which-also-happened-to-be-bob-moogs-birthday

    Hah, that's an interesting story, I'd never heard of that. It's actually quite comparable to the current situation.

    Regarding the bigger picture: I'm not sure if the meritocratic system is good or bad. Nothing is good or bad, it all depends on the viewpoint I guess. What's clear though is that a meritocratic system can't work if there's nothing to do to show your merits! 😄

    I mean, some big organizations apparently are already investigating the Universal Basic Income. And while many might disregard it as a crazy communist idea, it might be the only way to "fix" society once AI becomes pervasive.

    But man, I'm a software developer, not a politician or social scientist (fortunately, I might add!)

  • Get ready for iOS 18..Apple is not exactly sleeping on Ai either..Look for some of that to find its way into Logic Pro, both for desktop and iPad.
    https://www.tomsguide.com/tech-events/wwdc-2024-announced-for-june-10-get-ready-for-apples-biggest-ai-push-ever-with-ios-18

  • @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane.

    It is scary.

    If it can knock together a pop song like that... think of the military/people oppression uses.

  • I'm excited to see if any of it is useful sample fodder.

  • Making money at creating music is already extremely hard. AI is going to make the effort practically impossible. Creating music as a hobby will still be a thing, but AI will be integrated into apps like Logic Pro and the temptation will be hard to resist just letting the app generate most if not all of the music. AI will one day generate most music and humans will just learn to play the AI-generated music for live performances. Or maybe lazy people will just press a button on stage and lip-sync. Will people even care to see live music? Will the TikTok generation just watch AI generated music videos? The future is gonna be weird.

  • edited April 4

    @SevenSystems said:

    @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

    As a non-commercial musician, who plays for fun and self-therapy, AI does not bother me much, but I fully understand the concerns.

    Yes I don't produce music commercially anymore either. But it's hard to ignore for anyone who does. But as I say, maybe they'll just make commercial usage of AI-generated music (or any kind of content) illegal or something to protect society ("jobs"). (I would actually kinda understand this! Although it would be better to just accept that humans will have to work far less in the future, which is basically a good thing. Obviously society will have to be properly "fine-tuned" for that, a monumental task that I don't entrust the current politicians with at all. So maybe better go the "ban" route.)

    My main concern with AI is that it get's more and more difficult to identify AI generated media. I sadly see people's perception getting more and more confused. On one hand blindly taking everything they hear or see on the media for the truth, on the other rejecting long established scientific facts as AI generated fakes.

    Well, people blindly trusting the media is nothing new, and there's no AI required to generate fake or manipulative content. It just makes it far easier 🥴

    Edit: f it, deleted everything lol. Not worth it.

    This is why I love ai and ai fake news and the trolling of the massive lying hypocritical self righteous joke western society is. U_U I cannot stomach the smugness and self satisfaction and entitlement. Let it burn.

    Watching guardian and bbc readers and watchers call everyone else liars when they consume literally the most politically biased media in my country, whose fact checking consists of cherry picking the parts of studies they like while ignoring the actual conclusion of the study. Have demonstrated this many times but telling the truth, or holding up a table of results from a study is now ‘hate speech’ lol

    Once again. Let it and them burn

  • edited April 4

    Back to suno: I’ve used it for fun for a while. It’s chucked out mostly I’d say stuff that’s superior to popular music. And every now and again it creates some inspired bit. I have this one song from it that is absolutely amazing lol

    It shook me a bit. But I think, good. Let’s change society. Let’s shake everything up it’s all so fucking boring. Music is generic rubbish, bring in ai, steamroll everything. Destroy all talent shows, destroy all ‘singers’. Create new types of music after this initial llm stage. New new new.

    I see it as a competitor. I’m glad for that. I didn’t see any before and feel motivated again. Sharpen up, and as much as I hate this phrase, get good.

    But it’s the tools that are exciting and potential, I was using this experimental ai thing which allowed you to mix all these instruments to produce in between instrument sounds. It was just a quick experiment some people, did. The future is incredible. Full ai synths. Full suites of any instrument you want with a text prompt. The whole notion of synths and loads of software just gone. Just type what you want. Surely it’s just a matter of time. It’s infinity

  • edited April 4

    @Slam_Cut said:
    Making money at creating music is already extremely hard. AI is going to make the effort practically impossible. Creating music as a hobby will still be a thing, but AI will be integrated into apps like Logic Pro and the temptation will be hard to resist just letting the app generate most if not all of the music. AI will one day generate most music and humans will just learn to play the AI-generated music for live performances. Or maybe lazy people will just press a button on stage and lip-sync. Will people even care to see live music? Will the TikTok generation just watch AI generated music videos? The future is gonna be weird.

    Anyone who is tempted to do that is not musical and shouldn’t really be any more than someone having a hobby pushing buttons anyway. I can’t imagine feeling the least temptation under any circumstance to do that. I open logic to make music, like I sit at my piano. Not to listen to someone or something else’s.

    I’d say people who would do that would not own a daw. But sadly I’m probably wrong hahaha

  • edited April 5

    Suno was made for people with no musical knowledge or skills, so definitely not DAW owners. Up to now releasing music for most people is like adding a drop of water into the Sea of Anonimity, but AI will generate so much music that it will be more like a Water Planet. There could be some interest by consumers in music labeled “Human Made”, but then how will consumers truly know the difference. We can kinda tell AI music today by subtle ques, just barely and only on some tracks. Most tracks would be convincing enough if we don’t pay close attention to them. Soon, it will be nearly impossible. Soon AI will be posting on this forum trying to convince people to use Suno or other AI music generators.

  • @SevenSystems said:

    @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:

    @catherder said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    This is really pretty insane. The writing's on the wall for any kind of studio, songwriter or artist that makes their living with commercial productions for others. If politics don't shut it down or cripple it.

    As a non-commercial musician, who plays for fun and self-therapy, AI does not bother me much, but I fully understand the concerns.

    Yes I don't produce music commercially anymore either. But it's hard to ignore for anyone who does. But as I say, maybe they'll just make commercial usage of AI-generated music (or any kind of content) illegal or something to protect society ("jobs"). (I would actually kinda understand this! Although it would be better to just accept that humans will have to work far less in the future, which is basically a good thing. Obviously society will have to be properly "fine-tuned" for that, a monumental task that I don't entrust the current politicians with at all. So maybe better go the "ban" route.)

    My main concern with AI is that it get's more and more difficult to identify AI generated media. I sadly see people's perception getting more and more confused. On one hand blindly taking everything they hear or see on the media for the truth, on the other rejecting long established scientific facts as AI generated fakes.

    Well, people blindly trusting the media is nothing new, and there's no AI required to generate fake or manipulative content. It just makes it far easier 🥴

    All very well said. And I agree that the current "meritocratic" system that puts financial rewards for work at it's centre is a major problem. But I'm not sure if banning AI would work. We had it before:
    https://musicradar.com/news/the-union-passed-a-motion-to-ban-the-use-of-synths-drum-machines-and-any-electronic-devices-the-day-the-loony-musicians-union-tried-to-kill-the-synthesizer-which-also-happened-to-be-bob-moogs-birthday

    Hah, that's an interesting story, I'd never heard of that. It's actually quite comparable to the current situation.

    Musicians struck in the US for several years in the 40s against jukebox competition. In the 80s musicians wanted a special tax on recording tape.

  • What I want in AI is a band that can respond to my playing, in an idiom of my choosing. It’s the musician’s equivalent of a seggsbot.

  • @Slam_Cut said:
    Making money at creating music is already extremely hard. AI is going to make the effort practically impossible. Creating music as a hobby will still be a thing, but AI will be integrated into apps like Logic Pro and the temptation will be hard to resist just letting the app generate most if not all of the music. AI will one day generate most music and humans will just learn to play the AI-generated music for live performances. Or maybe lazy people will just press a button on stage and lip-sync. Will people even care to see live music? Will the TikTok generation just watch AI generated music videos? The future is gonna be weird.

    We will come back to the root: face to face performance will be more valued

Sign In or Register to comment.