Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

AI You Vs You

The shape of things to come?

Comments

  • Here's a poem I wrote using some of the new tools. I had to refine it until I got to this point.

    It Doesn’t Matter. Live Today.

    In painted worlds where pixels gleam,
    Technology spins its endless dream.
    Digital wonders, crafted and bright,
    Offer illusions, shadows of light.
    Ever-shifting, like sand on the shore,
    Screens will change, but leave you wanting more.
    Never forget the faces near,
    Time’s true gifts are always here.

    Music and laughter, warm and close,
    Art and voices, what we hold most.
    Through layers of code, it’s hard to see,
    Touch and love, where life’s meant to be.
    Embrace this world, your breath, your sky,
    Real moments pass as screens slip by.

    Live in the now, where hearts align,
    In sounds and smiles that shape your time.
    Value the real, don’t wait to say,
    Each day is yours—just live today.

    (Read each line anew, see what the first letters say.)

  • It really doesn't matter. Tech will always get better. It's a never-ending painting.
    Same with the digital world. Heck, even the world is a never-ending painting. We cannot control when we are born, or what the world, and others will think of us when we are done with this earth.

    But live today. Live in the moment. Tomorrow is uncertain.

    Of course, plan for the future, but seriously...live today.

    SEONN -LIV TODAY

  • @seonnthaproducer I agree about living everyday to it’s fullest, but for anyone who has built up a YouTube channel or released music or any other forms of art for that matter, to have it all jeopardised from copyrighted iterations of your art could be at the very least an irritating problem even possibly a disaster.

  • @knewspeak said:
    @seonnthaproducer I agree about living everyday to it’s fullest, but for anyone who has built up a YouTube channel or released music or any other forms of art for that matter, to have it all jeopardised from copyrighted iterations of your art could be at the very least an irritating problem even possibly a disaster.

    Possibly. Yeah.
    But again, it really doesn’t matter.

    There’s tons of AI content out there, yet we still have our favourite music that we go back to each time.

    There’s tons of videos out there, yet we still watch and recommend our favorite movies and YouTube content.

    Plus, with enough proof, these copywrite strike can be removed by submitting the complaint.

    I’ve been hit by copywrite bots a lot, even when I was a new channel. I still make content because I like to make content.

  • Not everyone is so sanguine.

  • @garden said:
    Not everyone is so sanguine.

    I know given the lack of laws regarding this content and the policy in place on many platforms, this could be a major headache for creativity if this becomes more prevalent.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @garden said:
    Not everyone is so sanguine.

    I know given the lack of laws regarding this content and the policy in place on many platforms, this could be a major headache for creativity if this becomes more prevalent.

    Laws will never improve OR squash creativity. Creative people thrive under any conditions.

  • “So, OASIS really needs to break up for good.”
    😉

  • Law was the last thing on my mind.

  • edited November 14

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @garden said:
    Not everyone is so sanguine.

    I know given the lack of laws regarding this content and the policy in place on many platforms, this could be a major headache for creativity if this becomes more prevalent.

    Laws will never improve OR squash creativity. Creative people thrive under any conditions.

    ...and they reflect their society and the shittier society gets the shittier art gets. (Ok maybe took it too far there... or not ;) )

  • @AudioGus said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @garden said:
    Not everyone is so sanguine.

    I know given the lack of laws regarding this content and the policy in place on many platforms, this could be a major headache for creativity if this becomes more prevalent.

    Laws will never improve OR squash creativity. Creative people thrive under any conditions.

    ...and they reflect their society and the shittier society gets the shittier art gets. (Ok maybe took it too far there... or not ;) )

    I was speaking as to the intellectual property rights of artistic content and how policy and laws regarding this will need to take into consideration AI and all the implications it will bring about.

    As to society, presently I would say that Western society has much at stake given the amount of artistic content it creates.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @NeuM said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @garden said:
    Not everyone is so sanguine.

    I know given the lack of laws regarding this content and the policy in place on many platforms, this could be a major headache for creativity if this becomes more prevalent.

    Laws will never improve OR squash creativity. Creative people thrive under any conditions.

    ...and they reflect their society and the shittier society gets the shittier art gets. (Ok maybe took it too far there... or not ;) )

    I was speaking as to the intellectual property rights of artistic content and how policy and laws regarding this will need to take into consideration AI and all the implications it will bring about.

    I was just being a goof.

    As to society, presently I would say that Western society has much at stake given the amount of artistic content it creates.

    Yah absolutely. This sort of thing has been keenly in peoples minds the past couple years with image generation, concept art, video etc. It is so easy to just take an existing image and spit out variations of it. 3D is getting much better too. Things like games and films will be less likely to show early footage because people will be able to saturate the market with knock offs before the final product is released.

    Copyright is likely effectively dead soon too.

  • @AudioGus said:

    Copyright is likely effectively dead soon too.

    Except of course for those controlled by the main, and fewer, media rights owners.

  • @garden said:

    @AudioGus said:

    Copyright is likely effectively dead soon too.

    Except of course for those controlled by the main, and fewer, media rights owners.

    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

  • @AudioGus said:

    @garden said:

    @AudioGus said:

    Copyright is likely effectively dead soon too.

    Except of course for those controlled by the main, and fewer, media rights owners.

    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

    This is a distinct possibility I do agree and certainly one that could see artistic creativity flourish, but another one could could see an even tighter grip on copyright, one that could have implications for anyone that has used the copyright material in any form, a fruit of the tree but maybe retroactively applied.

  • @AudioGus said:
    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

    Oh yeah. Certainly. The infrastructure for physical media is disappearing, to be replaced by digital rights owners who have long since revealed their lies about wide access to catalog.

  • @knewspeak said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @garden said:

    @AudioGus said:

    Copyright is likely effectively dead soon too.

    Except of course for those controlled by the main, and fewer, media rights owners.

    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

    This is a distinct possibility I do agree and certainly one that could see artistic creativity flourish, but another one could could see an even tighter grip on copyright, one that could have implications for anyone that has used the copyright material in any form, a fruit of the tree but maybe retroactively applied.

    I don't see how copyright would apply to interactive experiences.

  • @garden said:

    @AudioGus said:
    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

    Oh yeah. Certainly. The infrastructure for physical media is disappearing, to be replaced by digital rights owners who have long since revealed their lies about wide access to catalog.

    By static media I mean media that does not respond to the participant. For example, we currently have canned static music. Music of the future will be that which responds in realtime to the desire of the listener/participant. There will be no copyright in this situation.

  • @AudioGus said:

    @knewspeak said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @garden said:

    @AudioGus said:

    Copyright is likely effectively dead soon too.

    Except of course for those controlled by the main, and fewer, media rights owners.

    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

    This is a distinct possibility I do agree and certainly one that could see artistic creativity flourish, but another one could could see an even tighter grip on copyright, one that could have implications for anyone that has used the copyright material in any form, a fruit of the tree but maybe retroactively applied.

    I don't see how copyright would apply to interactive experiences.

    I think they’re probably the safest territory via the ‘fair use’ policy but the whole problem involves multiple jurisdictions with different policies to AI and when revenue grows from the use of AI I also foresee litigation to determine the beneficiaries of that revenue, so probably many test cases will ensue.

  • @AudioGus said:

    @garden said:

    @AudioGus said:
    I could see static media not lasting too. The only things of interest to future generations will be interactive/dynamic/living things.

    Oh yeah. Certainly. The infrastructure for physical media is disappearing, to be replaced by digital rights owners who have long since revealed their lies about wide access to catalog.

    By static media I mean media that does not respond to the participant. For example, we currently have canned static music. Music of the future will be that which responds in realtime to the desire of the listener/participant. There will be no copyright in this situation.

    Unless the copyright laws govern the derivative material, but again fair use may be applied, but remember the beauty of art is in part a shared experience, if every creation is unique, this aspect is lost.

Sign In or Register to comment.