Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Anyone use iMidiPatchBay, I have a question
I'm setting up a song in iMidiP which uses one of my Korg Module programs. There seems to be no way to assign Volume in the iMidiP song because Volume is set to send on CC7 in iMidiP and Korg, for some reason I can't fathom, has Volume assigned to CC11. There seems to be no way in either of these apps to reassign the CC number assignments, all of which are factory set. Suggestions?
Comments
Try MidiBridge or MidiFlow and have that reassign CC7 to CC11.
Is one easier to learn than the other?
Dunno...I'm more familiar with MidiBridge personally. I think either should work though.
thanks!
FYI: MidiFlow has a friendlier user interface, although MidiBridge has even more in-depth filtering and reassignment. For what you're doing I'd go MidiFlow.
Hi @LeesKeys,
iMIDIPatchbay cannot reassign Control Changes at the moment. As already mentioned, Midiflow (my other app) does. You can find all its features here: http://midiflow.com/documentation/
I'm biased, or course, but let me add this: MidiBridge is the long old classic and is said to have "more in-depth filtering". But this is mainly the StreamByter, a feature that lets you remap any MIDI message via code. Midiflow lets you do those things, most of the time, with an easy-to-use UI instead. However, there might be cases where you need the total low-level control that MidiBridge offers.
Just compare the features. And, by the way, Midiflow has tons of things that MidiBridge doesn't have: Controller conditions, Controller retention, Import/export of remappings, MIDI monitor, custom virtual MIDI ports, MIDI clock, clock divsion, controller modes 'latch' and 'increase', Support for RPN/NRPN, App icons, ...
I have both but still tend to reach for Midibridge probably just familiarity but it seems a lot simpler to me.
Just read through the whole midiflow documentaion. It looks really amazing :-) Don't know how this is written, but all I would be concerned about, would be any latency added. Can anyone comment on that?
i did not notice any latency with midi flow
I haven't noticed any increased latency with any of them. MIDI doesn't seem to be as prone to latency issues than audio, probably due to the relatively tiny amounts of data being processed.
Midiflow also has great support as you can see by the appearance of @JohannesD