Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Blip Interactive Ltd

2»

Comments

  • >

    At this point, I'm kinda paralysed because it feels like ANY non-physical human output could and probably will become obsolete in the not-too-distant future. At least in the context of commercial endeavours. Crazy times.

    Yeah as someone who has two STEM degrees (math & mech. engineering) that doubled down on programming being my niche in those fields it’s pretty scary how much an AI can do. Haven’t had any luck finding work involving data analysis in math, engineering, etc. in 7ish years at this point. Given, my location isn’t huge on data or tech so that plays into it. Hopefully something breaks one of these days but AI is making even STEM degrees feel a little useless at this point. No regrets on getting mine since the skills and knowledge I gained are personally invaluable but still.

  • @wim said:
    Matt detailed his reasons in a post that is no longer available even on the internet wayback machine. They were purely personal / philosophical and weren't due to library or other licensing issues. Basically, he just didn't want to do it. I think he may have mentioned leaving his options open to return to it some day, though he had no intention of doing so. I could be mis-remembering that part though.

    If it was for purely personal/philosophical reasons, I'm sorry to be harsh, but Matt was/is being utterly selfish in my own opinion. He could've simply sold the code to somebody else who is reputable and would be willing to maintain the code without adding tracking and other shady practices. Also, while many of us hate subscriptions for other apps, I think most of us would've been willing to pay a subscription fee for maintaining it.

  • @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @wim said:
    Matt detailed his reasons in a post that is no longer available even on the internet wayback machine. They were purely personal / philosophical and weren't due to library or other licensing issues. Basically, he just didn't want to do it. I think he may have mentioned leaving his options open to return to it some day, though he had no intention of doing so. I could be mis-remembering that part though.

    If it was for purely personal/philosophical reasons, I'm sorry to be harsh, but Matt was/is being utterly selfish in my own opinion. He could've simply sold the code to somebody else who is reputable and would be willing to maintain the code without adding tracking and other shady practices. Also, while many of us hate subscriptions for other apps, I think most of us would've been willing to pay a subscription fee for maintaining it.

    He gave those ideas serious consideration and concluded they weren’t viable options. He’s in a far better position to know than anyone else.

    Imagine if you poured your heart and soul into an art or music project for years, then people judged you for your decisions about how to deal with the loss of that dream.

    Sorry, but it just isn’t our place to do that in my opinion.

  • Even though the majority of us are not likely to make a dime with our music (especially considering our investments), most of us don’t want to open source our music and give it away for free to anyone who wants to use it for any purpose they have.

  • @Halftone said:
    I wonder how easy it would be to ask AI to code an app similar in features & workflow (plus audio tracks!)??

    Absolutely impossible. Totally ouf of possibilities of current models, with current tempo

  • edited December 2025

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @wim said:
    Matt detailed his reasons in a post that is no longer available even on the internet wayback machine. They were purely personal / philosophical and weren't due to library or other licensing issues. Basically, he just didn't want to do it. I think he may have mentioned leaving his options open to return to it some day, though he had no intention of doing so. I could be mis-remembering that part though.

    If it was for purely personal/philosophical reasons, I'm sorry to be harsh, but Matt was/is being utterly selfish in my own opinion. He could've simply sold the code

    😄 Good luck finding someone willing to buy it for more than a token amount!

    (I don't mean that his code isn't intrinsically of great value; it's just that nobody is going to buy a hugely complex application with apparently limited commercial potential, as evidenced by its disappearance from the App Store!)

  • @FizzyLizzy27 said:

    >

    At this point, I'm kinda paralysed because it feels like ANY non-physical human output could and probably will become obsolete in the not-too-distant future. At least in the context of commercial endeavours. Crazy times.

    Yeah as someone who has two STEM degrees (math & mech. engineering) that doubled down on programming being my niche in those fields it’s pretty scary how much an AI can do. Haven’t had any luck finding work involving data analysis in math, engineering, etc. in 7ish years at this point. Given, my location isn’t huge on data or tech so that plays into it. Hopefully something breaks one of these days but AI is making even STEM degrees feel a little useless at this point. No regrets on getting mine since the skills and knowledge I gained are personally invaluable but still.

    Yes. And what's even scarier is how blissfully (🥴) unaware or in utter, almost pathological denial most people are.

    Apart from "using" AI massively during software development myself, I've also simply conversed with it about absolutely anything and everything, from deep philosophical discussions, to complex and precise science, to whatever -- a total of ~ 7,000,000 words. So yes. The potential is, if anything, vastly underestimated.

  • @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @wim said:

    Also, while many of us hate subscriptions for other apps, I think most of us would've been willing to pay a subscription fee for maintaining it.

    I think you’re underestimating the hate for subscriptions. It would have been an uphill battle considering most people wouldn’t get a sub for Logic Pro… and it has more of the features people wanted but never made it to NS2.

  • @wim @SevenSystems and others - don't mind me, lol. I'm just jaded and grouchy at the moment.

  • @DSZA said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @wim said:

    Also, while many of us hate subscriptions for other apps, I think most of us would've been willing to pay a subscription fee for maintaining it.

    I think you’re underestimating the hate for subscriptions. It would have been an uphill battle considering most people wouldn’t get a sub for Logic Pro… and it has more of the features people wanted but never made it to NS2.

    True, that's very true.

  • wimwim
    edited December 2025

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @DSZA said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @wim said:

    Also, while many of us hate subscriptions for other apps, I think most of us would've been willing to pay a subscription fee for maintaining it.

    I think you’re underestimating the hate for subscriptions. It would have been an uphill battle considering most people wouldn’t get a sub for Logic Pro… and it has more of the features people wanted but never made it to NS2.

    True, that's very true.

    fwiw, I would pay a modest subscription for NS2 if it was going to get audio tracks within two years and would be maintained going forward. It's the only iOS/iPad app I would pay a subscription for though. Matt just didn't think the model would work sufficiently to replace his day job. He also didn't think that anyone would acquire it for what he'd see as a reasonable compensation for all his effort. He's probably right on both counts.

  • @wim said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @DSZA said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @wim said:

    Also, while many of us hate subscriptions for other apps, I think most of us would've been willing to pay a subscription fee for maintaining it.

    I think you’re underestimating the hate for subscriptions. It would have been an uphill battle considering most people wouldn’t get a sub for Logic Pro… and it has more of the features people wanted but never made it to NS2.

    True, that's very true.

    fwiw, I would pay a modest subscription for NS2 if it was going to get audio tracks within two years and would be maintained going forward. It's the only iOS/iPad app I would pay a subscription for though. Matt just didn't think the model would work sufficiently to replace his day job ... and is probably right.

    I pay a sub for Auxy Studio, because it's being updated frequently again, and I can make great music in it very rapidly.

  • @anickt said:

    @AlexY said:
    NS2 is still light years ahead in terms of UX usability with the piano roll than anything I’ve tried on mobile.

    FLSM is pretty good but no AUv3 and the mixer is not great. I’ve gone with AEMS as the closest experience I’ve had to NS2 but with audio tracks! NS2 is still awesome but my way of working requires audio tracks. NS2♥️

    I have FLMS but I might have to check AEMS out.

    @AudioGus said:

    @AlexY said:
    NS2 is still light years ahead in terms of UX usability with the piano roll than anything I’ve tried on mobile.

    sigh, I love being able to layer midi clips on tracks like it does. makes everything else without it slightly painful.

    Yeah. I feel like NS2 spoiled me.

  • @AlexY said:
    Yeah. I feel like NS2 spoiled me.

    I bet most of us feel that way…

  • @AlexY said:

    @anickt said:

    @AlexY said:
    NS2 is still light years ahead in terms of UX usability with the piano roll than anything I’ve tried on mobile.

    FLSM is pretty good but no AUv3 and the mixer is not great. I’ve gone with AEMS as the closest experience I’ve had to NS2 but with audio tracks! NS2 is still awesome but my way of working requires audio tracks. NS2♥️

    I have FLMS but I might have to check AEMS out.

    I tried AEMS a couple days ago (I purchased it ages ago), and for me personally it isn't anything like NS2. If it works for our friend Anickt as an NS2 replacement, I'm glad. For me, FLSM and GR-II are the closest I've come to an NS2 workflow. FLSM has audio tracks, and GR-II doesn't.

    @AudioGus said:

    @AlexY said:
    NS2 is still light years ahead in terms of UX usability with the piano roll than anything I’ve tried on mobile.

    sigh, I love being able to layer midi clips on tracks like it does. makes everything else without it slightly painful.

    Yeah. I feel like NS2 spoiled me.

    NS2 spoiled me too. Nothing else really does come close.

  • There is a certain elegance that NS2 has that nothing else has IMHO. 😎✌🏼

  • @anickt said:
    There is a certain elegance that NS2 has that nothing else has IMHO. 😎✌🏼

    Exactly. It's why I'm still "butthurt" about it being sunset. Some people's minds still want to stick with an app as long as possible. My mind is like "It's done for, I need to adapt to a new environment, or I'll never get anything done." Like, I'm not sure if it's my neurodivergency or not, but it's literally impossible for me to "stay on a sinking ship".

    I still love NS2 and hope Matt will someday change his mind, or at least release Obsidian as an AUv3. 🙏

  • wimwim
    edited December 2025

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @anickt said:
    There is a certain elegance that NS2 has that nothing else has IMHO. 😎✌🏼

    Exactly. It's why I'm still "butthurt" about it being sunset. Some people's minds still want to stick with an app as long as possible. My mind is like "It's done for, I need to adapt to a new environment, or I'll never get anything done." Like, I'm not sure if it's my neurodivergency or not, but it's literally impossible for me to "stay on a sinking ship".

    I still love NS2 and hope Matt will someday change his mind, or at least release Obsidian as an AUv3. 🙏

    You strike me as someone who rarely looks back after you finish a tune. You're also one that can fluidly switch between DAWs without so much as a blip in your creativity. Both admirable traits. 👍🏼

    If those are true, then whether a DAW is gonna die some time in the future, carries little downside. You can just wail away on it while it lasts, knowing that if it dies some day the tunes you made in it are already in the can, and you can just jump on a fresh horse like some crack Pony Express rider. 🤜🏼

  • @wim said:

    @jwmmakerofmusic said:

    @anickt said:
    There is a certain elegance that NS2 has that nothing else has IMHO. 😎✌🏼

    Exactly. It's why I'm still "butthurt" about it being sunset. Some people's minds still want to stick with an app as long as possible. My mind is like "It's done for, I need to adapt to a new environment, or I'll never get anything done." Like, I'm not sure if it's my neurodivergency or not, but it's literally impossible for me to "stay on a sinking ship".

    I still love NS2 and hope Matt will someday change his mind, or at least release Obsidian as an AUv3. 🙏

    You strike me as someone who rarely looks back after you finish a tune. You're also one that can fluidly switch between DAWs without so much as a blip in your creativity. Both admirable traits. 👍🏼

    Thanks mate. Yeah, it's true that I rarely look back once a tune is finished. Can't get stuck in the past afterall. And I definitely can switch fluidly between DAWs (except for N-Track, which I had refunded twice due to the bugs it's riddled with in my own personal usage).

    If those are true, then whether a DAW is gonna die some time in the future, carries little downside. You can just wail away on it while it lasts, knowing that if it dies some day the tunes you made in it are already in the can, and you can just jump on a fresh horse like some crack Pony Express rider. 🤜🏼

    Pretty much, yeah mate. :)

Sign In or Register to comment.