Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

"Sony develops technology to trace origin of AI-made music"

AlexYAlexY
in Other Music Content

TLDR from Digg's AI:

"Sony Group Corp. has developed technology to identify the original source of music generated by artificial intelligence, aiming to protect the rights of creators and address concerns over unauthorized use of copyrighted works in AI training."

https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/71035

The Digg post where this was shared:

https://digg.com/music/mZ1JyB8/sony-develops-technology-to-trace-origin

Comments

  • AudioGusAudioGus
    edited February 25

    edit... eh screw it

    Edit 2: awww ok here it is again, but I think I am developing an unhealthy relationship with this subject in general, hehe ;) anywho...

    This sounds exactly like the same thing that showed up with image models years ago. People assumed that if an AI image “looked like” a certain artist, the model must be pulling from or reconstructing specific works. In practice, diffusion models do not contain indexed copies of source images. They encode statistical patterns. Proving direct derivation has been pretty much impossible in court as statistical similarity is not legal causation.

    Even if Sony can show that generated music is statistically closer to certain training works, that does not automatically equal infringement. This is just a play to get investors playing along.

  • AlexYAlexY

    I thought your answer was informative. WIsh you had kept it. :)

  • rs2000rs2000
    edited February 25

    @AudioGus said:
    ...
    Even if Sony can show that generated music is statistically closer to certain training works, that does not automatically equal infringement. This is just a play to get investors playing along.

    I'm sure this will be a major point of discussion. They will develop some software that they claim will prove whatever and their advocates will be better than yours.
    Unfortunately there's no clear line between stolen work and a unique composition, too much depends on how someone determines the rules, and that has nothing to do with how the music is written, be it by AI or humans.

    The subject is getting more and more awkward, remember the guy who made thousands of AI-auto-generated songs and had them all copyrighted?

  • FizzyLizzy27FizzyLizzy27

    Why does this give me flashbacks to the Coldplay Viva la Vida case with Joe Satriani?

  • wimwim

    Sorry for the off topic, but I just had to post this. The punchline in the last few seconds had me rolling on the floor.

Sign In or Register to comment.