Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Link audio apps

2»

Comments

  • dendydendy
    edited May 7

    @wim said:
    Shoot. No receive in LinkKit. So no two-way equivalent of iDAM yet.

    well, here it is.. Both Receive / Send .. Beta available for now until I sort SDK licensing stuff.

    https://forum.loopypro.com/discussion/68389/link-audio-experimental-send-receive-auv3-plugins

  • wimwim

    @dendy said:

    @wim said:
    Shoot. No receive in LinkKit. So no two-way equivalent of iDAM yet.

    well, here it is.. Both Receive / Send .. Beta available for now until I sort SDK licensing stuff.

    https://forum.loopypro.com/discussion/68389/link-audio-experimental-send-receive-auv3-plugins

    Nice! I'll take a look.

  • sveinbjornsveinbjorn

    @Fantastic said:
    The last point is the one for me. I'd look forward to Djay Pro's live real-time stem separation whereby the stems could each be streams to Loopy Pro. At the moment Djay Pro is just master out via KQ loopback, not even individual decks out

    I don’t think djay would be useful. The latency on “realtime” stemsep is like half a second, at least the plugins I have tried, their algos sound similar to djay’s separation. I assume that the djay stemsep is similar, working ahead and buffering as needed, rather than immediate.
    So that method would probably cause delays.
    You need something that can slow the latency of the daw to compensate.

  • FantasticFantastic
    edited June 12

    @sveinbjorn said:

    @Fantastic said:
    The last point is the one for me. I'd look forward to Djay Pro's live real-time stem separation whereby the stems could each be streams to Loopy Pro. At the moment Djay Pro is just master out via KQ loopback, not even individual decks out

    I don’t think djay would be useful. The latency on “realtime” stemsep is like half a second, at least the plugins I have tried, their algos sound similar to djay’s separation. I assume that the djay stemsep is similar, working ahead and buffering as needed, rather than immediate.
    So that method would probably cause delays.
    You need something that can slow the latency of the daw to compensate.

    You very obviously haven't used it. There's no latency with djay pro's stem separation at all, not half a second, not a quarter of a second, not a tenth of a second. It works incredibly well. I use it a lot in peformance. I wouldn't use it to replace Logic's offline rendering if I was looking for the best possible sound, but its very comparable with pretty much all other popular splitters, with the advantage of being real-time.

  • FantasticFantastic

    @Fantastic said:

    @sveinbjorn said:

    @Fantastic said:
    The last point is the one for me. I'd look forward to Djay Pro's live real-time stem separation whereby the stems could each be streams to Loopy Pro. At the moment Djay Pro is just master out via KQ loopback, not even individual decks out

    I don’t think djay would be useful. The latency on “realtime” stemsep is like half a second, at least the plugins I have tried, their algos sound similar to djay’s separation. I assume that the djay stemsep is similar, working ahead and buffering as needed, rather than immediate.
    So that method would probably cause delays.
    You need something that can slow the latency of the daw to compensate.

    You very obviously haven't used it. There's no latency with djay pro's stem separation at all, not half a second, not a quarter of a second, not a tenth of a second. It works incredibly well. I use it a lot in peformance. I wouldn't use it to replace Logic's offline rendering if I was looking for the best possible sound, but its very comparable with pretty much all other popular splitters, with the advantage of being real-time.

    I don't have my own video using it, and this is NOT indicative of my taste in DJ's :smile: but it does absolutely demonstrate DJay's stem separating being performed in absolute real-time in a mode where sensitivity to latency really matters. . Note the lanes in the left and right displays for the stems and D'angelo's controlling of when the levels are up and down.

  • sveinbjornsveinbjorn

    @Fantastic said:
    You very obviously haven't used it. There's no latency with djay pro's stem separation at all, not half a second, not a quarter of a second, not a tenth of a second. It works incredibly well. I use it a lot in peformance. I wouldn't use it to replace Logic's offline rendering if I was looking for the best possible sound, but its very comparable with pretty much all other popular splitters, with the advantage of being real-time.

    And you are running live audio through it? Not playback like you usually use Djay?

  • FantasticFantastic

    @sveinbjorn said:

    @Fantastic said:
    You very obviously haven't used it. There's no latency with djay pro's stem separation at all, not half a second, not a quarter of a second, not a tenth of a second. It works incredibly well. I use it a lot in peformance. I wouldn't use it to replace Logic's offline rendering if I was looking for the best possible sound, but its very comparable with pretty much all other popular splitters, with the advantage of being real-time.

    And you are running live audio through it? Not playback like you usually use Djay?

    No, I wouldn't even have a use case for that. Maybe Robin Rimbaud type things of playing live radio shows through it if I was a more experimental type of human. If there was a band they'd have individual mics/lines. If there was a recording it would go in my DJ playlist. I'm sure as you're asking you can imagine the use case but no, not my requirement at all.

  • sveinbjornsveinbjorn

    I seem to be causing some misunderstanding. My apologies.

    If you split stems beforehand in traktor, you can play them in real time. Djay plays in realtime. But those seconds its loading a track, its spinnig up a buffer. This is not new, dj software always did this, but now that buffer includes stem sep. It does not need to separate the entire song, and it can separate a track faster than it takes to play it back.

    But stem sep still isn’t a real time technology, it just isn’t, because it works with a very large sample/length of audio at once. It’s not like a neural amp or the like, those are pre-processed (precomputed) and audio can flow through them predictably. There’s more compute in stem sep.

    Thus, again, its not a good candidate for Link Audio, you want it all to reside inside a controlled system. Like djay. That can manage a large buffer before you press play so it feels real time and seamless.

    Trust me, this has been a special iterest of mine for years.

    If you look at hardware, no standalone mixers do stem sep. Because it can’t be done. Or not with any public technology.

    That’s my only point.

    I use Djay, it works great. Its stem sep is flawless for a “real time” system. The term “real time” is a slight fib, its more “just-in-time” processing. Ready very quickly when you need it so it feels like its instantaneous.

    Hope this explains it.

  • FantasticFantastic

    @sveinbjorn said:
    I seem to be causing some misunderstanding. My apologies.

    If you split stems beforehand in traktor, you can play them in real time. Djay plays in realtime. But those seconds its loading a track, its spinnig up a buffer. This is not new, dj software always did this, but now that buffer includes stem sep. It does not need to separate the entire song, and it can separate a track faster than it takes to play it back.

    But stem sep still isn’t a real time technology, it just isn’t, because it works with a very large sample/length of audio at once. It’s not like a neural amp or the like, those are pre-processed (precomputed) and audio can flow through them predictably. There’s more compute in stem sep.

    Thus, again, its not a good candidate for Link Audio, you want it all to reside inside a controlled system. Like djay. That can manage a large buffer before you press play so it feels real time and seamless.

    Trust me, this has been a special iterest of mine for years.

    If you look at hardware, no standalone mixers do stem sep. Because it can’t be done. Or not with any public technology.

    That’s my only point.

    I use Djay, it works great. Its stem sep is flawless for a “real time” system. The term “real time” is a slight fib, its more “just-in-time” processing. Ready very quickly when you need it so it feels like its instantaneous.

    Hope this explains it.

    You don't actually know what you're talking about. And claiming its been a special interest doesn't separate you from anyone else here. For having a specialist interest you don't actually know this stuff.

    https://www.audioshake.ai/products/sdk
    It's real time. Djay's algo is audioshake, and audioshake, is, realtime. No fib.
    ANd why on earth are you trying to pronounce whether DJ software is a good candidate for Link Audio. In fact Deadmau5 already demo'd his prototype software which incorporates Link Audio.
    Its coming.
    Just a weird waste of time response.

  • sveinbjornsveinbjorn

    @Fantastic said:

    @sveinbjorn said:
    I seem to be causing some misunderstanding. My apologies.

    If you split stems beforehand in traktor, you can play them in real time. Djay plays in realtime. But those seconds its loading a track, its spinnig up a buffer. This is not new, dj software always did this, but now that buffer includes stem sep. It does not need to separate the entire song, and it can separate a track faster than it takes to play it back.

    But stem sep still isn’t a real time technology, it just isn’t, because it works with a very large sample/length of audio at once. It’s not like a neural amp or the like, those are pre-processed (precomputed) and audio can flow through them predictably. There’s more compute in stem sep.

    Thus, again, its not a good candidate for Link Audio, you want it all to reside inside a controlled system. Like djay. That can manage a large buffer before you press play so it feels real time and seamless.

    Trust me, this has been a special iterest of mine for years.

    If you look at hardware, no standalone mixers do stem sep. Because it can’t be done. Or not with any public technology.

    That’s my only point.

    I use Djay, it works great. Its stem sep is flawless for a “real time” system. The term “real time” is a slight fib, its more “just-in-time” processing. Ready very quickly when you need it so it feels like its instantaneous.

    Hope this explains it.

    You don't actually know what you're talking about. And claiming its been a special interest doesn't separate you from anyone else here. For having a specialist interest you don't actually know this stuff.

    https://www.audioshake.ai/products/sdk
    It's real time. Djay's algo is audioshake, and audioshake, is, realtime. No fib.
    ANd why on earth are you trying to pronounce whether DJ software is a good candidate for Link Audio. In fact Deadmau5 already demo'd his prototype software which incorporates Link Audio.
    Its coming.
    Just a weird waste of time response.

    Not at all. You solved the thing. Quite miserably, but still. I can’t make you like things.

    I misunderstood some things you’d said. Pointless to go into it. We are now both the wiser. Hope your tomorrow is filled with blessings and wonder.

Sign In or Register to comment.