Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
Thanks very much, I appreciate it!
A selectable grid for the Arranger is something I want very much as well, and it's on the mid-term roadmap.
Thanks for considering it. It’s not a high priority thing. However, I did find myself scratching my head over what to do with the recorded midi once it was there. I eventually figured out that I needed to add output instruments, and then that I could convert the recorded lanes so that they were assigned to the output instruments. I’m not sure that concept would be discovered by beginning users. Maybe it’s in an updated manual (I haven’t looked for awhile), but if not it should probably be mentioned.
On another subject ... When adding those 16 output instruments, I was scratching my head over why, instead of taking advantage of all the screen real estate to list the channels, you chose to add all the channels in only the first row. I was figuring they would stack into more rows rather than having to scroll across the top. Suspecting you think through everything interface wise very carefully, it got me thinking. “Could he be planning a clip triggering grid á la modstep?” If not ... considered the idea planted...
... or that maybe “wrapping” the instruments around to multiple rows would be more convenient when working with multiple tracks. -Just a thought.
-cheers, and thanks again! Xequence is a true gem!
I wonder that too
@wim @senhorlampada Haha, I've been wondering for a year now why nobody has ever asked that question
The reason is that Xequence has been leading a secret double life for quite some time
I feel like I just walked into a telephone booth when Clark Kent was changing.
Wait what. Is xequence secretely a daw ?????
Today people are really killing me with references to actors that I never heard of because I never owned a TV in my adult life
But yeah, the stuff about tracks and instruments and how multitrack recording makes copies of the selected track for the automatically added tracks is covered in the current manual... I know there's room for improvement though! I first want to collect feedback from users and see how it is actually used in practice, and then improve step by step.
Actors... Hmm. I'm just going to let that one go.
Sorry, fictional character I should say
Woah wow.
This will heal our nation.
Thank you in advance.
Release it immediately.
No wonder you get so much work done!
In other news... secret picture of AmpifyxNovation's "Feature Requests" office revealed!
I think I was being too coy.
What exactly is this and when can we play with it?
Real nice. Now EVERYBODY knows.
smdh
@tja I barely know Superman himself!
@ExAsperis99 I can't give too many details really at this stage, sorry. All I can say is that the purists among you don't have to worry -- Xequence will stay a lean and clean MIDI-only sequencer as it is now, and be fully maintained and enhanced further. This other thing, if it ever gets finished, will be a separate app.
It will share many of Xequence's features and of course its great workflow, but will be simplified and have a different target audience and thus probably not be very interesting for the forum, as it very likely won't have any audio connection to the outside world.
I've said in another thread that I still think that the best possible music production flow on a small device is having everything in a single, optimized UI in one app. Maybe this hints at where I'm trying to go
I agree with your last statement 100%. That's what makes Gadget so great in my eyes.
App of the year for me
Ain’t no party like a Xequence party because Xequence updates don’t stop!
It will be interesting to see something closed after Xequence being so open. It'll be like watching Rob Petrie drive the Knight Rider car on that one Friends episode.
@aaronpc hey, I did watch Knight Rider when I was < 16 or so... MICHAEL!!!11 THEY'RE BEHIND US! TURBO BOOST!
Knock out blow right there....
I like the three bears chairs as well.
It says...
“MIDI Sync Master (Clock/Start/Stop/Continue/SPP) - other DAWs & sequencers can run in sync with Xequence, e.g. to use audio tracks, or external drum machines. Several modes for full compatibility”
...but can it slave though if I send midi clock from my desktop daw?
Sorry, no slaving to external MIDI sync.
(however, full tempo/phase/start/stop sync through AB3 and Ableton Link.)
Wait, is this SaveAs bug still around? Did I seriously just lose the project I've been working on for two weeks?
Just...couldn’t....resist!
@ExAsperis99 sorry to hear you're having trouble, I'm not aware of any bug involving Save As. Could you give me more details?
tl;dr: quite possibly user error aggravated by misinformation earlier in the thread about a state-saving quirk that seems to have been fixed.
The longer story:
I was having a tricky time getting AudioKit Synth One to read Xeq midi; it was hosted in AB3 with audio sent to AUM. The keyboard in Xeq had no sound if the midi destination was Audiobus; however, the sound emerged when I switched the destination to the AudioKit Synth. That's not the problem. I created a new project to test this, but when I went to open the project, it was not listed; I seemed to have accidentally overwritten it with the new attempt. In the end, I reloaded the AB3 preset of the original project, and all was restored. (And saved under two aliases; belt and suspenders, you know.)
That said, does AudioKit Synth One behave unusually for anyone?
@ExAsperis99 phew, glad you got it sorted... I remember losing projects in the old Windows 3.11 Cubase days with them blue screens. Since then, I've gotten used to saving the current project once every few minutes, AND under a new name each time! I do that to this day and I still recommend this to anyone, in any kind of application. Software is the most complicated thing mankind has created, and it fails!
About the Synth One problems, haven't heard about that so far... but from various info on this forum and on the net, I guess it's generally a bit flakey...