Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Skram and WretchsUp on sale

2»

Comments

  • edited April 2016

    @syrupcore said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @liine_nick said:

    I just took a look at Naves recording and yes it is like Animoogs. I wouldn't really want to see something that complex in Skram. I love the one screen with widgets that flip. i just imagine another red dot next to the current one that maybe has a tracks symbol on it. :smile:

    Same. I'd rather you guys focus on what you've been focusing on and instead add IAA/AB ports for each instrument. Then we can multi-track our faces off in apps that focus on that.

    Animoog and Nave's multitrackers are fun but they're still walled gardens. Also, their recorders are great at capturing simple riffs or layered ambient type stuff but not so good for beat oriented stuff so the 4-track tape deck model works fine but I dunno how useful that model would actually be in an app like Skram.

    Session and loop capture directly within the app is always useful but a full on multitrack seems a bit of a waste of time.

    Yah I don't think anyone was saying there should or would be a full on multitracker.

  • it would be super though, to have each widget in a project be able to export a perfect loop of it's output and keep a library of those in a central place in the app so that any future sample mangling widgets could access them.

  • @AudioGus said:

    @syrupcore said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @liine_nick said:

    I just took a look at Naves recording and yes it is like Animoogs. I wouldn't really want to see something that complex in Skram. I love the one screen with widgets that flip. i just imagine another red dot next to the current one that maybe has a tracks symbol on it. :smile:

    Same. I'd rather you guys focus on what you've been focusing on and instead add IAA/AB ports for each instrument. Then we can multi-track our faces off in apps that focus on that.

    Animoog and Nave's multitrackers are fun but they're still walled gardens. Also, their recorders are great at capturing simple riffs or layered ambient type stuff but not so good for beat oriented stuff so the 4-track tape deck model works fine but I dunno how useful that model would actually be in an app like Skram.

    Session and loop capture directly within the app is always useful but a full on multitrack seems a bit of a waste of time.

    Yah I don't think anyone was saying there should or would be a full on multitracker.

    Pardon my half thought there. Think I was trying to say that for a multitracker to actually be useful inside of Skram, it would need to be a 'full on' multitracker. And since that's going to be a mountain of work, work that other devs have already done, just skip it.

    Unless we're talking about plain stem export where you'd have the option when doing a session record to capture each instrument separately. That'd be useful but again, there are a ton of apps for that once AB/IAA is on deck. Capturing perfect loops where the user can pick which instruments go into the loop, how long the loop is in musical terms and have the option to wrap the loop's tail onto the start would be, imho, a much better use of any recording oriented development time.

  • @syrupcore said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @syrupcore said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @liine_nick said:

    I just took a look at Naves recording and yes it is like Animoogs. I wouldn't really want to see something that complex in Skram. I love the one screen with widgets that flip. i just imagine another red dot next to the current one that maybe has a tracks symbol on it. :smile:

    Same. I'd rather you guys focus on what you've been focusing on and instead add IAA/AB ports for each instrument. Then we can multi-track our faces off in apps that focus on that.

    Animoog and Nave's multitrackers are fun but they're still walled gardens. Also, their recorders are great at capturing simple riffs or layered ambient type stuff but not so good for beat oriented stuff so the 4-track tape deck model works fine but I dunno how useful that model would actually be in an app like Skram.

    Session and loop capture directly within the app is always useful but a full on multitrack seems a bit of a waste of time.

    Yah I don't think anyone was saying there should or would be a full on multitracker.

    Pardon my half thought there. Think I was trying to say that for a multitracker to actually be useful inside of Skram, it would need to be a 'full on' multitracker. And since that's going to be a mountain of work, work that other devs have already done, just skip it.

    Unless we're talking about plain stem export where you'd have the option when doing a session record to capture each instrument separately. That'd be useful but again, there are a ton of apps for that once AB/IAA is on deck. Capturing perfect loops where the user can pick which instruments go into the loop, how long the loop is in musical terms and have the option to wrap the loop's tail onto the start would be, imho, a much better use of any recording oriented development time.

    Here is what I am thinking. Currently when you hit record a single file is written to device. You can email this file to yourself or copy it with itunes. What I was saying is I would like there to be four that are written simultaneously, one for each widget.

    Like most feature requests people make, mine is completely self serving and based entirely on me. :wink:

  • @AudioGus Yeah, that's more like stem export. Agree it'd be useful (along with the AudioShare SDK) but would be pretty low on my (entirely self serving) wish list.

  • @syrupcore said:
    @AudioGus Yeah, that's more like stem export. Agree it'd be useful (along with the AudioShare SDK) but would be pretty low on my (entirely self serving) wish list.

    Just out of curiosity are you a live guy?

  • @AudioGus said:

    @syrupcore said:
    @AudioGus Yeah, that's more like stem export. Agree it'd be useful (along with the AudioShare SDK) but would be pretty low on my (entirely self serving) wish list.

    Just out of curiosity are you a live guy?

    He's a bot.

  • @AudioGus said:

    @syrupcore said:
    @AudioGus Yeah, that's more like stem export. Agree it'd be useful (along with the AudioShare SDK) but would be pretty low on my (entirely self serving) wish list.

    Just out of curiosity are you a live guy?

    No, not anymore. Like the Right Mr. Goodyear said, I'm more bot these days. :)

    Think, generally, I don't really like to see apps duplicate existing functionality (presuming the existing options are good). I'd rather them integrate existing standards for portability and spend as much time as possible nurturing/growing/refining whatever it is that makes their app awesome. Like Unix. Terse yet feature rich applications that do one thing, does it well and allows you to pipe the input and output to other single purpose apps. *

    For instance, Skram is the perfect candidate for exporting tight loops to use in other apps. I'm all for seeing that in app but I'd much rather have AB and LINK first (or only). Then I can use Loopy or similar to capture those perfect loops as well as all of the other goodness we'd get with AB/IAA/Link like effects processing or stem export.

    * Then again, Nanostudio remains my favorite iOS app so take everything I say ever with a pound and a half of salt. ;]

  • @syrupcore said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @syrupcore said:
    @AudioGus Yeah, that's more like stem export. Agree it'd be useful (along with the AudioShare SDK) but would be pretty low on my (entirely self serving) wish list.

    Just out of curiosity are you a live guy?

    No, not anymore. Like the Right Mr. Goodyear said, I'm more bot these days. :)

    Think, generally, I don't really like to see apps duplicate existing functionality (presuming the existing options are good). I'd rather them integrate existing standards for portability and spend as much time as possible nurturing/growing/refining whatever it is that makes their app awesome. Like Unix. Terse yet feature rich applications that do one thing, does it well and allows you to pipe the input and output to other single purpose apps. *

    For instance, Skram is the perfect candidate for exporting tight loops to use in other apps. I'm all for seeing that in app but I'd much rather have AB and LINK first (or only). Then I can use Loopy or similar to capture those perfect loops as well as all of the other goodness we'd get with AB/IAA/Link like effects processing or stem export.

    * Then again, Nanostudio remains my favorite iOS app so take everything I say ever with a pound and a half of salt. ;]

    Ahh I see. I am not looking for making tight loops or stem export. Stem export in my mind applies more to sequencing but we are probably in semantic land too. As for iaa multiple outputs that has never worked very well with any of the apps i tried, so i am gun shy, maybe it is my air1 choking. But yah i just like making long jams and mixing them after the fact in a pc daw.

    In the end Skram is offering four widgets at once with a performance oriented UI and new widgets to come down the pipe so to my mind I am more than happy to just stay in Skram, spend money like a mofo and jam, provided I can record it in a way that is not unmixable after the fact. If they can record one now then maybe they can record four? 25% of the way there!

Sign In or Register to comment.