Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
Pro L. You cannot finish mastering a song without it, while MB is not urgent if you already have C2.
I use the Pro L in every single mix and wow the power. I have the Pro-MB and i dont use it as much. I guess it depends on your end result
Must say I have not got my money's worth out of DS (yet). I have NO DOUBT this is entirely my fault, but there it is.
Pro-DS works for me, I have used it a fair few times with good results. Sometimes I daisy chain 2 instances with different settings targeting different frequencies.
Pro L is essential IMO, I use it on every single mix.
Pro MB I use on drum loops and drummer files out of GarageBand. It works better than EQ on pre-mixed material like that.
Why is Pro-L so much better than the built-in limiter?
I suspect that sonically it's not hugely 'better', but it has a lot more features, for sure. I wouldn't describe it as 'essential'. That's just a bugbear for me, I don't find it helpful when things are referred to as being essential...
I find that the spectrum display on the C2 and Q2 to be very useful. The Q2 has a lot more features (again) than the channel strip Eq, but my feeling is that the channel strip Eq and compressor / expander (in particular) are certainly up to the job.
You can push things much further before getting distortion or artefacts.
@Igneous1 notice the crucial "IMO" after my claim of Pro L being essential
How can one manufacturers zeros and ones be any better than another?
Point taken @richardyot
I just take exception sometimes when references are made to things (that people prefer to use), as being deemed as 'essential'.
By making the wordlenghts bigger (more bit depth) and by making the calculations better (more powerful algorythms).
Opinions are a matter of workflow
Just picked up Pro-Q 2. Opened an old idea I had abandoned long ago, a groove over old dialog snippets from the film The Appartment. The samples always sounded rather harsh, perhaps a reason I never finished the track. Immediately, I was able to target the offending frequencies, and the track is much easier on the ears now. Pro-Q 2 looks like quite the piece of software.
The only problem now is that I may be about to embark on a game of Fabfilter Go...collect them all!
Every time Mrs. Goodyear buys shoes I buy a Fabfilter. Seems fair.
So she's only has 10 pairs of shoe then?
............. 15 pairs if you include the sound packs from the synth selection?........... She's sounds like a "FAB" & sensible lady, does Mrs Goodyear......... 
She is incredibly fab, but not actually in everyday terms absolutely always completely sensible. All good.
I've also used Pro L much more than Pro MB. One reason is that both are heavy on the CPU, and on my Air 1, I reserved Pro L for the mix down version of the tune, where it worked very well. Pro MB would have been useful on tracks in the mixing version of the song, but the cpu hit was usually too steep. (Such issues are much less of a problem on my iPad Pro).