Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Is AUM enough? Do I need another DAW??

2»

Comments

  • Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

  • @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

  • @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

  • edited June 2017

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    Cubasis 2.x is really great, but, why you should choose Auria Pro spells; FABFILTER!

    The IAP plugins in Auria is superior to anything on iPad...

    >

    I must agree with ErrkaPetti. Auria Pro can be awkward to use, depending how you use it, but nothing touches Fab Filters. These are expensive by IOS standards, but anyone can hear the big difference they make.

    I swapped from Cubasis 2, to Auria Pro, mainly for FF, which are not compatible with any other IOS DAW. Nor are they likely to be anytime soon, according to FF.

    AUM, is a fantastic app. Not a DAW as such, but so useful for running multiple apps and recording in a number of ways. You can do your initial recordings via AUM, then sequence and polish them up in Auria Pro.

  • edited June 2017

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

  • @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    It's your prerogative :) even ableton doesn't have a master record so this is something some of us are used to doing.

  • @Zen210507 said:

    @ErrkaPetti said:
    Cubasis 2.x is really great, but, why you should choose Auria Pro spells; FABFILTER!

    The IAP plugins in Auria is superior to anything on iPad...

    >

    I must agree with ErrkaPetti. Auria Pro can be awkward to use, depending how you use it, but nothing touches Fab Filters. These are expensive by IOS standards, but anyone can hear the big difference they make.

    I swapped from Cubasis 2, to Auria Pro, mainly for FF, which are not compatible with any other IOS DAW. Nor are they likely to be anytime soon, according to FF.

    AUM, is a fantastic app. Not a DAW as such, but so useful for running multiple apps and recording in a number of ways. You can do your initial recordings via AUM, then sequence and polish them up in Auria Pro.

    The fact everything gets saved to AudioShare and is clipped into perfect segments when ableton link is on is a fantastic thing for importing into Auria pro or Ableton itself.

  • @gonekrazy3000 said:
    The fact everything gets saved to AudioShare and is clipped into perfect segments when ableton link is on is a fantastic thing for importing into Auria pro or Ableton itself.

    >

    Quite right. AUM is one of those Indispensable apps for IOS music makers.

  • @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    There's a lot of other benefits of setting up a master bus. For example to have a master volume fader, and putting effects on the whole mix (EQs, filters, compression etc).

  • @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    There's a lot of other benefits of setting up a master bus. For example to have a master volume fader, and putting effects on the whole mix (EQs, filters, compression etc).

    So, next to the master record button it would make a nice addition adding the FX section . Or an option to show/hide the master track
    :tongue:

    Seriously, I like AUM very much , it's just a feature request which may not be essential for others ...

  • @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    There's a lot of other benefits of setting up a master bus. For example to have a master volume fader, and putting effects on the whole mix (EQs, filters, compression etc).

    So, next to the master record button it would make a nice addition adding the FX section . Or an option to show/hide the master track
    :tongue:

    Seriously, I like AUM very much , it's just a feature request which may not be essential for others ...

    I prefer the current generic and more modular approach :) You might want multiple masters, or groups going into yet another master, etc. No reason to special-case anything, a master is a mixbus.

    The question about hiding tracks is another issue. Collapsing channels into compact strips to save space would be a cool feature, as well as having "sticky" channels that don't scroll away (useful for master channel(s)).

  • @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    There's a lot of other benefits of setting up a master bus. For example to have a master volume fader, and putting effects on the whole mix (EQs, filters, compression etc).

    So, next to the master record button it would make a nice addition adding the FX section . Or an option to show/hide the master track
    :tongue:

    Seriously, I like AUM very much , it's just a feature request which may not be essential for others ...

    I prefer the current generic and more modular approach :) You might want multiple masters, or groups going into yet another master, etc. No reason to special-case anything, a master is a mixbus.

    The question about hiding tracks is another issue. Collapsing channels into compact strips to save space would be a cool feature, as well as having "sticky" channels that don't scroll away (useful for master channel(s)).

    I would definitely love the ability to group tracks. Some of my experiments can get quite long to scroll through. The sticky channels would be amazing too :D but more than either I really really would love an AUx version of Aufx:Push. I'd even rebuy it if that's insentive.

    More than anything else a sidechain compressor that is capable of multiple instances is something I need badly :( currently I send audio into Auria pro to add pro c2 and then back to Aum. But being able to do it with just Aum itself would be marvelous.

  • @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    There's a lot of other benefits of setting up a master bus. For example to have a master volume fader, and putting effects on the whole mix (EQs, filters, compression etc).

    So, next to the master record button it would make a nice addition adding the FX section . Or an option to show/hide the master track
    :tongue:

    Seriously, I like AUM very much , it's just a feature request which may not be essential for others ...

    I prefer the current generic and more modular approach :) You might want multiple masters, or groups going into yet another master, etc. No reason to special-case anything, a master is a mixbus.

    The question about hiding tracks is another issue. Collapsing channels into compact strips to save space would be a cool feature, as well as having "sticky" channels that don't scroll away (useful for master channel(s)).

    I would definitely love the ability to group tracks. Some of my experiments can get quite long to scroll through. The sticky channels would be amazing too :D but more than either I really really would love an AUx version of Aufx:Push. I'd even rebuy it if that's insentive.

    More than anything else a sidechain compressor that is capable of multiple instances is something I need badly :( currently I send audio into Auria pro to add pro c2 and then back to Aum. But being able to do it with just Aum itself would be marvelous.

    Please :heart:

  • @Dubbylabby said:

    ...

    I would definitely love the ability to group tracks. Some of my experiments can get quite long to scroll through. The sticky channels would be amazing too :D but more than either I really really would love an AUx version of Aufx:Push. I'd even rebuy it if that's insentive.

    More than anything else a sidechain compressor that is capable of multiple instances is something I need badly :( currently I send audio into Auria pro to add pro c2 and then back to Aum. But being able to do it with just Aum itself would be marvelous.

    Please :heart:

    :)

    Yeah, that's part of a bigger plan: to make AUv3 versions of all my AUFX apps (might be done as new app releases, we'll see) and to add support for routing such side-chain stuff in AUM (needs a way to select which input/output bus of an AUv3 plugin to use at a specific point in the signal flow).

  • @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @Korakios said:

    @gonekrazy3000 said:

    @Korakios said:

    @j_liljedahl said:
    Note that you can use AUM as a traditional mixer + multitrack tape recorder setup. Quite a lot of albums have been recorded that way... :)

    Plus a "record master output" would be useful :)

    That's easily solved. Send everything to a bus. Record the bus.

    Nope, too many steps, a single click is easier

    There's a lot of other benefits of setting up a master bus. For example to have a master volume fader, and putting effects on the whole mix (EQs, filters, compression etc).

    So, next to the master record button it would make a nice addition adding the FX section . Or an option to show/hide the master track
    :tongue:

    Seriously, I like AUM very much , it's just a feature request which may not be essential for others ...

    I prefer the current generic and more modular approach :) You might want multiple masters, or groups going into yet another master, etc. No reason to special-case anything, a master is a mixbus.

    The question about hiding tracks is another issue. Collapsing channels into compact strips to save space would be a cool feature, as well as having "sticky" channels that don't scroll away (useful for master channel(s)).

    Yes collapsble groups = awesome

    Or maybe a zoom out mode where you get the view you get when moving channels around

  • @Hansson said:
    Yes collapsble groups = awesome

    Or maybe a zoom out mode where you get the view you get when moving channels around

    I was more thinking of collapsing single channels into compact strips that does not allow full interaction, but allowed level fader and mute/solo etc. But yeah, visual groups would also be nice.

    Problem with a zoom-out view is that I don't want to make the UI too small to use, unless it's really just a non-interactive view (one would have to zoom back in to interact with it).

  • colapsing to strips sound really good too, also while we are at AUM, maybe an option to rename Mix Buses ?
    maybe zoomed out wouldnt work so good for Iphone and reg Ipad, iam on Big pro and there would be enough space there i think.

Sign In or Register to comment.