Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

the *new* NanoStudio hype discussion thread ...

2»

Comments

  • @anickt said:
    Some interesting insight for those who haven’t seen this:

    http://forums.blipinteractive.co.uk/node/11966

    Thanks, so encouraging, will buy NS2 for sure looking forward for it!!!!!

  • @anickt said:
    Some interesting insight for those who haven’t seen this:

    http://forums.blipinteractive.co.uk/node/11966

    Wow this was a really interesting read. That guy seems like a really cool dude. I didn’t realise he was British too. The screen shots look incredible. His apparent attention to detail and quality is impressive.

    For the first time I am starting to wonder if this will overtake BM3 as my new DAW of choice on iOS. And I am one of THE BIGGEST bm3 lovers out there and I can’t believe my mind is starting to shift in that direction. Although all of the time I have invested in bm3 building banks and organising all my samples may have been wasted time if that’s the case. Will be interesting to see how this pans out.

  • edited August 2018

    Of course just a personal opinion but NS1 and NS2 even more (plus some good AUv3) might be all i ever would want on an iOS device for music creation.
    Everything else or bigger projects are anyway a lot faster and easier to achieve for me inside Logic on my mac.
    I think i have tryed nearly all iOS DAW‘s but NS1 was it for me for years (until i made the fault to update to iOS 11). For audio tracks i used BM2 (sorry but i don‘t like the workflow of BM3).
    So i think NS2 IS IT!!
    There is also the nostalgia since NS1 was my start where i put my first track ever together.

  • NS1 instantly clicked with me and I’m super charged up for a release later this year. Wish the developer speedy and rewarding coding

  • edited August 2018

    @universe said:

    @anickt said:
    Some interesting insight for those who haven’t seen this:

    http://forums.blipinteractive.co.uk/node/11966

    Wow this was a really interesting read. That guy seems like a really cool dude. I didn’t realise he was British too. The screen shots look incredible. His apparent attention to detail and quality is impressive.

    For the first time I am starting to wonder if this will overtake BM3 as my new DAW of choice on iOS. And I am one of THE BIGGEST bm3 lovers out there and I can’t believe my mind is starting to shift in that direction. Although all of the time I have invested in bm3 building banks and organising all my samples may have been wasted time if that’s the case. Will be interesting to see how this pans out.

    When I first saw the snapshots (these were floating up time ago) I thought “BM3 mockup?” But after BM3 workflow lacks (like scene launch) and complexity I forgot all about.
    Then the “NS1 deadly iOS11 topic” came and Inhit purchase for my old iPhone4 and it works flawless and seems smart workflow... never felt the same with Bm2/3...

    I never put all the time needed to climber the BM3 learning curve and now I’m most interested on NS2 even without the same scene launch workflow... it’s madness!

    It’s like it seems well designed from workflow and stability and I have curiosity.

  • I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

  • @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

  • edited August 2018

    I wanted to love it (beatmaker), I really did. Maybe I still do. . . but probably not after this week. I successfully staved off my desire for Korg EWave, spotted NanoStudio (where have I been??) and now all this positive news coming about NanoStudio 2. My head is spinning. :)

  • The thing about NS is there will most likely be nothing to complain about with NS2 (for those of us that are reasonable at least LOL!) which is something that can't often be said!

  • I’m very curious about NS2, up to this point I don’t use a DAW on iOS, I use AUM with xsequence and when at home I have studiomux linked with Ableton live. NS2 is the first iOS DAW I’m really considering, just need to find out how solid NS2’s midi timing is...

  • @Dubbylabby said:

    @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

    Honestly BM3 is INCREDIBLE though. That’s why even if NS2 ends up being as good as it seems, it really will take A LOT for me to move to it. Which is why I’m really surprised I’m even considering that.

    For anyone who says the learning curve is steep in bm3, TRUST ME, if you persevere and get over that hump bm3 is insane. I nearly caved in. But spent two solid days with the manual and the bm3 forum and I never looked back.

  • edited August 2018

    @universe said:

    @Dubbylabby said:

    @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

    Honestly BM3 is INCREDIBLE though. That’s why even if NS2 ends up being as good as it seems, it really will take A LOT for me to move to it. Which is why I’m really surprised I’m even considering that.

    For anyone who says the learning curve is steep in bm3, TRUST ME, if you persevere and get over that hump bm3 is insane. I nearly caved in. But spent two solid days with the manual and the bm3 forum and I never looked back.

    I believe you, really do. I know there is alot of power in there. Just don't know if, for me, it's worth that curve. I keep saying that I will get better with it and like you, just need to do the solid-two-days (or more, I'm a bit dense) to discover if that power is the sort of power I need. Then again, if NanoStudio 2 landed today, we wouldn't be having this conversation. hehehe

  • @kinkujin said:

    @universe said:

    @Dubbylabby said:

    @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

    Honestly BM3 is INCREDIBLE though. That’s why even if NS2 ends up being as good as it seems, it really will take A LOT for me to move to it. Which is why I’m really surprised I’m even considering that.

    For anyone who says the learning curve is steep in bm3, TRUST ME, if you persevere and get over that hump bm3 is insane. I nearly caved in. But spent two solid days with the manual and the bm3 forum and I never looked back.

    I believe you, really do. I know there is alot of power in there. Just don't know if, for me, it's worth that curve. I keep saying that I will get better with it and like you, just need to do the solid-two-days (or more, I'm a bit dense) to discover if that power is the sort of power I need. Then again, if NanoStudio 2 landed today, we wouldn't be having this conversation. hehehe

    Yes that’s fair enough. I’m always telling people about how good bm3 is, and I only tend to do that because I want to share the lightbulb moment of ‘woaah this software is incredible’ that I had. I kinda feel bad for people who give up with it early, as I think man if only they knew how it could change their musical game with a little more time. But hey each to their own. We al like different things

  • @universe said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @universe said:

    @Dubbylabby said:

    @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

    Honestly BM3 is INCREDIBLE though. That’s why even if NS2 ends up being as good as it seems, it really will take A LOT for me to move to it. Which is why I’m really surprised I’m even considering that.

    For anyone who says the learning curve is steep in bm3, TRUST ME, if you persevere and get over that hump bm3 is insane. I nearly caved in. But spent two solid days with the manual and the bm3 forum and I never looked back.

    I believe you, really do. I know there is alot of power in there. Just don't know if, for me, it's worth that curve. I keep saying that I will get better with it and like you, just need to do the solid-two-days (or more, I'm a bit dense) to discover if that power is the sort of power I need. Then again, if NanoStudio 2 landed today, we wouldn't be having this conversation. hehehe

    Yes that’s fair enough. I’m always telling people about how good bm3 is, and I only tend to do that because I want to share the lightbulb moment of ‘woaah this software is incredible’ that I had. I kinda feel bad for people who give up with it early, as I think man if only they knew how it could change their musical game with a little more time. But hey each to their own. We al like different things

    I appreciate your enthusiasm. It's infectious. I may still stay on the BM3 train, I'm not averse to having more than one tool in the toolchest. In fact, I'm forging ahead in my large way, with Gadget too.

  • edited August 2018

    @kinkujin said:

    @universe said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @universe said:

    @Dubbylabby said:

    @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

    Honestly BM3 is INCREDIBLE though. That’s why even if NS2 ends up being as good as it seems, it really will take A LOT for me to move to it. Which is why I’m really surprised I’m even considering that.

    For anyone who says the learning curve is steep in bm3, TRUST ME, if you persevere and get over that hump bm3 is insane. I nearly caved in. But spent two solid days with the manual and the bm3 forum and I never looked back.

    I believe you, really do. I know there is alot of power in there. Just don't know if, for me, it's worth that curve. I keep saying that I will get better with it and like you, just need to do the solid-two-days (or more, I'm a bit dense) to discover if that power is the sort of power I need. Then again, if NanoStudio 2 landed today, we wouldn't be having this conversation. hehehe

    Yes that’s fair enough. I’m always telling people about how good bm3 is, and I only tend to do that because I want to share the lightbulb moment of ‘woaah this software is incredible’ that I had. I kinda feel bad for people who give up with it early, as I think man if only they knew how it could change their musical game with a little more time. But hey each to their own. We al like different things

    I appreciate your enthusiasm. It's infectious. I may still stay on the BM3 train, I'm not averse to having more than one tool in the toolchest. In fact, I'm forging ahead in my large way, with Gadget too.

    Yes gadget is a very very good app too. But obviously the boon with bm3 is that you’re open to plugging in a whole suite of other cool AUs IAAs like egoist, Thor, Synth one etc etc. Though having said that you can do ALOT with gadget

  • @universe said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @universe said:

    @Dubbylabby said:

    @kinkujin said:
    I'm sensing a theme here, and it rings true for me as well ... NS1 is incredibly efficient and "just clicks" with so many people. BM3 is incredibly powerful and just seems to be a mountain to climb in many ways for many people. Therefore, NS2 is the app we are pinning our hopes on.
    Honestly, and as long as NS2 is an improvement on NS1(and truly it just needed 'updating' imo) I don't think it has far to go to really really please me and overtake all DAWs in my personal workflow.

    The thing for me now to ponder is -- do I bother to work on BM3 anymore? I'm moving closer to - I think not.

    I had it installed short period of time and it’s powerful but not my cup of tea as is.

    Honestly BM3 is INCREDIBLE though. That’s why even if NS2 ends up being as good as it seems, it really will take A LOT for me to move to it. Which is why I’m really surprised I’m even considering that.

    For anyone who says the learning curve is steep in bm3, TRUST ME, if you persevere and get over that hump bm3 is insane. I nearly caved in. But spent two solid days with the manual and the bm3 forum and I never looked back.

    I believe you, really do. I know there is alot of power in there. Just don't know if, for me, it's worth that curve. I keep saying that I will get better with it and like you, just need to do the solid-two-days (or more, I'm a bit dense) to discover if that power is the sort of power I need. Then again, if NanoStudio 2 landed today, we wouldn't be having this conversation. hehehe

    Yes that’s fair enough. I’m always telling people about how good bm3 is, and I only tend to do that because I want to share the lightbulb moment of ‘woaah this software is incredible’ that I had. I kinda feel bad for people who give up with it early, as I think man if only they knew how it could change their musical game with a little more time. But hey each to their own. We al like different things

    It’s an amazing app which sadly can’t cover my needs and have an step up learning curve which makes me avoid trying to know what else offers... aka not my cup of tea :smiley:

  • @[Deleted User]
    just need to find out how solid NS2’s midi timing is...

    Somewhere at forums Matt mentioned that he invested fair amount of time to make MIDI timing tight and precise at very high level.. And that he is satisfied with result - can you imagine, if such perfectionist like Matt is satisfied with someting ? ;-)

  • Off Topic yet somehow related ... anyone use NanoStudio on their mac desktop?

  • @kinkujin said:
    Off Topic yet somehow related ... anyone use NanoStudio on their mac desktop?

    I have but not in a while

Sign In or Register to comment.