Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Spot the leak in this new BM3 video...

124

Comments

  • @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

  • @kinkujin said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    Once you sample the AU, the audio is saved in the sessions folder, you can easily create an audio track and drag it in there.

    ok, great then. I think I'll spend some more time this weekend and see how I get along with it. I never got too far before.

    I'm further along now than I was before with my love for groovebox style way of working. Maschine/Push/Circuit being the hardware that has me buzzing right now. I'm looking to BM3 to compliment that on ios. Yes?

    Yes.

  • @drcongo said:
    I found BM3 to be very stable when I used to use it, but there was one bug that killed it for me - the values in the au automation graph would sometimes go massively out of whack, like into negative numbers or something, and there was no way to get them back. I had an entire track that was finished and in the tweaking phase when this happened, and all of a sudden the entire track is borked. It made using BM3 into a very masochistic game of Russian roulette.

    Anyone know if this is fixed?

    This is top priority. We all want this fixed.

  • @arktek said:
    @AudioGus I've been finding that the track arming button on the audio track sometimes requires a couple of offs and ons before you start and then it's good to go. I don't know why and yes one shouldn't feel like you need to do that, but that's what I discovered recently after a few frustrating recording attempts. Works great on that track after doing that preliminary initialisation sequence.

    I was told this and tried it before (along with other superstitions / voodoo tricks) but still have had times when it did not work. All it takes is five minutes of (admittedly like self diluted) magic to evaporate and... :(

  • @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

  • @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    It is hard to explain if you haven’t used BM3 (and it is an avoidable use case) but essentially it is a just a condition for recording that doesn’t record anything. You can sample AU instruments and AU fx just fine.

  • edited September 2020

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

  • edited September 2020

    @AudioGus said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    It is hard to explain if you haven’t used BM3 (and it is an avoidable use case) but essentially it is a just a condition for recording that doesn’t record anything. You can sample AU instruments and AU fx just fine.

    Great! My play with it last night has renewed my interest. I'm just trying to replicate, to some extent, my other groovebox experiences. And then in a perfect world, offload them from BM3 to desktop.

  • @tk32 said:
    Risky AUv3 plugins...

    • D1 (Audiokit)
    • FM Player 2 (Audiokit)
    • Fly Tape (MSXII)
    • Axon (AudioDamage)
    • Replicant 2 (AudioDamage)

    ...there are more, but I probably deleted them.

    Feel free to post yours.

    I have added a compatibility section on the wiki page. People please add to that page if there are other AU you find unreliable in BM3

    https://wiki.audiob.us/doku.php?id=beatmaker_3

  • @hansjbs said:

    @papertiger said:
    @hansjbs is it possible to resize audio or midi regions from the left? In other words, can I adjust the length/start point in the arrange/timeline view from the left or is it still limited to the righthand side of a region only?

    Thanks in advance. I loved Beatmaker 3 dearly when I first explored it but eventually ran into a few things that prevented me from using it. It is an amazing sampler.

    That’s a no for midi and Audio in arranger/timeline view, still limited to end point only but you just reminded me that I don’t like that either. I knew I was forgetting something to add to the list. Thanks.

    @hansjbs Wow! Great news. Thank you very much. 😊

  • @tja said:
    It's strange that AU plugins can crash a host.
    From my understanding, this should not happen and feels like a bug in the host.
    The host needs to be able run any crap and handle it properly.

    But then, i never programmed such a thing.

    A well-programmed host should be relatively immune to crashes and corruption caused by a poorly-behaved plugin. AUM and Audiobus 3 seem to have been built well in this regard. Plugin crashes tend not to kill things or prevent sessions from loading. I believe the same is true of Apematrix, but I don't have very much experience with it.

    For DAWs, the situation is much more of a mixed bag. Auria Pro, for example, seems much more influenced by poorly-behaved AU than AUM and AB3. This is compounded by a bug in Auria Pro's recovery mechanism that is supposed to give you an opportunity to select a project snapshot when you launch it after a project crashed.

    NS2 and Cubasis and BM3 are mixed bags. Their stability seems to be to be influenced by badly behaving AUs but to a lesser degree.

  • @Samu said:

    @tja said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @tja said:
    It's strange that AU plugins can crash a host.
    From my understanding, this should not happen and feels like a bug in the host.
    The host needs to be able run any crap and handle it properly.

    But then, i never programmed such a thing.

    I don’t know of any host in anything that can do what you’re asking. The best I’ve seen is the host won’t crash when a plugin crash and allows you to save your work but fully functional after the crash nope.

    It’s like your saying a company should be able to run with any types of employees, lazy, disgruntled, unskilled ect...it should be able to still make a profit.

    It’s like your saying with 4 flat tires I should be able to drive the car and run properly. :D

    No.

    I am saying that a host should be able to handle bad plugins.

    Like a company should be able to handle a nuclear explosion?

    Which is a fair comparison since memory-management on iOS/iPadOS is beyond the control of the host developer.
    If the host tells the OS to load a plug-in, the OS reserves memory for the plug-in and flushes the host out from the ram if it runs out of resources, just one example other is GPU allocation for UI rendering etc. etc. etc.(Ie. a host has a UI rendering loop which uses OpenGL or something similar and the Plug-In also uses the same OpenGL stuff and conflicts arise, this is partly why Metal was invented for resource allocation and to my knowledge BM3 never got the Metal rendering engine but relies on OpenGL)

    Memory protection on a desktop with proper multi-tasking is way more advanced than what we've got on iOS/iPadOS...

    I'm not defending any developers here, just stating one facts that iOS/iPadOS is no where near as robust as any of the current desktop operating systems when it comes to memory & resource management.

    Even AUM can go down due to OS related issues...

    While AUM may occasionally go down when a plugin misbehaves, it (and AB3) does so far far less frequently than any of the DAWs that host AUv3. While iOS may not be as robust as the better desktop OS releases, it is more robust than you imply. iOS does have memory protection (an app crashing rarely crashes another app -- so much so that many people go months without even power-cycling their devices or doing any sort of reset).

  • edited September 2020

    @espiegel123
    While iOS may not be as robust as the better desktop OS releases

    Actually how host vs. plugins works on iOS is better than on desktop in some way. Or to be exact, it's a bit restricted on iOS exactly from reason to get hosts less likely crashing when plugon crashes. On desktop, host is allowed to load plugins into own threads, which is a tiny bit better in terms of performance, but also lot more propable that buggy plugin take down whole host.

    On iOS, plugin's thread are strictly splitted from host thread. All instances of same plugin are sharing single UI thread, but each one runs DSP audio in own thread - and they all
    are totally separated from host thread, communication between host and plugin runs strictly through iOS API "inter-app" communication layer.

    @tk32
    My limited understanding of the problem is that BM3 expects all AUv3 parameters to work to a 0.00-1.00 value range, and some plugin Devs use 0-254 instead.

    Plugin is allowed to use any range of values for parameter. Host is able to get from plugin information about min and max values for each parameter: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/audiotoolbox/auparameter

  • edited September 2020

    @dendy said:
    Plugin is allowed to use any range of values for parameter. Host is able to get from plugin information about min and max values for each parameter: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/audiotoolbox/auparameter

    And Blip notes that some AUs report wrong min/max ranges (bottom page in link). Could the long-standing squishy thingy bug be as simple as that? https://www.blipinteractive.co.uk/community/index.php?p=/discussion/479/some-notes-for-au-developers

  • Thanks. Those links are in the ticket. Hopefully they see them.

    Also, I wonder if problems with Audio Damage Replicant 2 have anything to do with the particular iPad's hardware sample rate? Or the attached audio interface's sample rate?
    That's my most used AU FX in BM3 and it's been rock-solid. Even when exporting multiple tracks w/ multiple instances of Rep2. 2017 iPad Pro 10.5 at 44.1kHz.

  • @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

    Yes you can. Don’t load the aufx for the overall bank, load it on the pad (pad mixer) with the AU instruments. Then you’ll be able to record With the aufx.

  • @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

    Yes you can. Don’t load the aufx for the overall bank, load it on the pad (pad mixer) with the AU instruments. Then you’ll be able to record With the aufx.

    I was saying not with an AU instrument but with a loop on the sampler.

  • edited September 2020

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

    Yes you can. Don’t load the aufx for the overall bank, load it on the pad (pad mixer) with the AU instruments. Then you’ll be able to record With the aufx.

    I was saying not with an AU instrument but with a loop on the sampler.

    See, when this window is open you cannot go to the FX and manipulate them manually while recording.

  • edited September 2020

    @AudioGus said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

    Yes you can. Don’t load the aufx for the overall bank, load it on the pad (pad mixer) with the AU instruments. Then you’ll be able to record With the aufx.

    I was saying not with an AU instrument but with a loop on the sampler.

    See, when this window is open you cannot go to the FX and manipulate them manually while recording.

    Would be awesome to have this...

    ...on this...

    ...for the purposes of recording the Sampler output with manipulating fx in realtime.

  • edited September 2020

    @AudioGus Ahhhh ok now I got you. Good one ;)

  • @hansjbs said:
    @AudioGus Ahhhh ok now I got you. Good one ;)

    Also when using the keyboard it needs an option to route the midi properly to the right plug-in or plug-ins.

    For example if multiple pads are used in one bank the keyboard needs to target the correct pad and its effects, it's a bit 'random routing' as is, the keyboard used for AUv3 effect always seems to target pad 1 in the current bank.

    For example when using a vocoder plug-in on an audio track there is currently no way to route a midi from a pad/bank to a plug-in hosted on the audio-track.

    I do get that a full routing matrix (route any pad in any bank to any audio track or pad in another bank) would get confusing for some but would be insanely flexible.

    Looking forward to the update when it drops :)
    (And maybe the above is already fixed, but I know nothing).

  • @Samu said:

    @hansjbs said:
    @AudioGus Ahhhh ok now I got you. Good one ;)

    Also when using the keyboard it needs an option to route the midi properly to the right plug-in or plug-ins.

    For example if multiple pads are used in one bank the keyboard needs to target the correct pad and its effects, it's a bit 'random routing' as is, the keyboard used for AUv3 effect always seems to target pad 1 in the current bank.

    For example when using a vocoder plug-in on an audio track there is currently no way to route a midi from a pad/bank to a plug-in hosted on the audio-track.

    I do get that a full routing matrix (route any pad in any bank to any audio track or pad in another bank) would get confusing for some but would be insanely flexible.

    Looking forward to the update when it drops :)
    (And maybe the above is already fixed, but I know nothing).

    I remember someone mentioning this issue. I’ll check the list. I don’t use it that way so I’ve never noticed it. Thanks

  • Seeing all this attention being paid to fixing bugs in BM3 is the best thing to happen in 2020.

  • @AudioGus I understand...sometime it does feel like voodoo...some days the Gods seem to smile upon me in ways I cannot imagine and then I hit one button and....seems to happen with too many apps in my opinion...having said all that I think BM3 does seem to be getting closer to that sample Nirvana...and maybe even one day it will fully realise it's full potential. Still fun to work with.....

  • edited September 2020

    @BitterGums said:
    Seeing all this attention being paid to fixing bugs in BM3 is the best thing to happen in 2020.

    Yup, if I can automate AU fx without worry I will certainly be loading up old BM3 sketches and pushing them further... then start whining for bank freezing again when the CPU maxes out. :)

  • @AudioGus said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

    Yes you can. Don’t load the aufx for the overall bank, load it on the pad (pad mixer) with the AU instruments. Then you’ll be able to record With the aufx.

    I was saying not with an AU instrument but with a loop on the sampler.

    See, when this window is open you cannot go to the FX and manipulate them manually while recording.

    Yo, I’ve recorded my main while turning knobs on turnado, I do it all the time, when that window pops up set up everything, like what you are recording and all that, then close that window, now hit the little red circle 🔴 , you can see it above the window to the left a bit, try that,. You can do it, I’ve been doing it for a while, and I just sample the main.

  • edited September 2020

    @skulptur_sound said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @AudioGus said:

    @hansjbs said:

    @kinkujin said:

    @AudioGus said:
    Two things could get me to come back to BM3 in a significant way. Automation becoming more reliable and recording the output of a bank to an audio track. I would love to just load up a couple AU FX on a bank and just noodle with them for five minutes knowing that the output is being safely recorded to an audio track. As it is this is a coin toss for me. I mess around with fx while recording only to find... nothing, blank audio track. So frustrating! Even better, if the sample to pad option that is next to the keyboard could be there on the FX window.

    So ... I’m on the verge of jumping in to this as I’m looking for something that feels like Maschine but isn’t crippled to death.

    Automation issue aside, are you saying you cannot load up an au instrument to sample within the app safely or without a crash? What would be the workaround. Correct me if I’m reading you wrong. Thx.

    We’re on the automation hunt and Audiogus knows since he sent us some nice videos which we have on file.

    Whoot! Great to hear! I wasn’t sure if there was a an actual hunt / follow up!

    You can definitely load an AU And sample it within the app. Gus wants to be able to sample it straight into an audio track instead of a pad.

    I would love to sample it into a pad too but that option only seems available when you have an AU instrument pad as the source. Unless I have missed a trick.

    Only way to load AUs at the moment is on a pad/bank.

    I know. What I am saying though is you cannot sample AUfx in the same way that you can sample AU instruments to a pad. It would be great to have the Sampler and Au fx with sample to pad.... ( unless I have missed a trick with layers or some such thing... )

    Scenario... play a loop on a pad with Turnado loaded as an AU fx and spin them big old dials and record the ouput to a pad. (i dont think this is possible... is it?)

    (PS. But if automation gets fixed then not a big deal as I will just do it as The Maker intended then!)

    Yes you can. Don’t load the aufx for the overall bank, load it on the pad (pad mixer) with the AU instruments. Then you’ll be able to record With the aufx.

    I was saying not with an AU instrument but with a loop on the sampler.

    See, when this window is open you cannot go to the FX and manipulate them manually while recording.

    Yo, I’ve recorded my main while turning knobs on turnado, I do it all the time, when that window pops up set up everything, like what you are recording and all that, then close that window, now hit the little red circle 🔴 , you can see it above the window to the left a bit, try that,. You can do it, I’ve been doing it for a while, and I just sample the main.

    Yes, I can record Turnado while twiddling knobs in some scenarios but was giving a specific circumstance in which it cannot be done.

  • Though I never cared much for mpc style sequencing I have always loved the sampler in Bm3. If the dang thing wouldn't crash 10 minutes into every use I would use it often. New features are great but if the stability isn't improved then what's the point?

  • @sippy_cup said:
    Though I never cared much for mpc style sequencing I have always loved the sampler in Bm3. If the dang thing wouldn't crash 10 minutes into every use I would use it often. New features are great but if the stability isn't improved then what's the point?

    If you are getting crashes every 10 minutes, there is something about your configuration (perhaps particular plugins?) causing the instability. I use it (primarily for its sampler -- using it for real-time re-pitching and tempo changing sliced up audio) and I rarely get crashes (i.e. I can go days or weeks between crashes). I don't run tons of tracks simultaneously and I avoid AU's that are known to cause issues.

    What plug-ins are you using with it? What hardware and OS?

  • @sippy_cup said:
    Though I never cared much for mpc style sequencing I have always loved the sampler in Bm3. If the dang thing wouldn't crash 10 minutes into every use I would use it often. New features are great but if the stability isn't improved then what's the point?

    The only thing I know of that gets a crash in BM3 (that is not AU related) is if you set more than 64 slices on a sample and play back a slice by double tapping on it.

Sign In or Register to comment.