Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
I dont really mind anymore about the interapp/audiobus with this one. as long as the sampling is solid i will be happy. i just want a solid sampler/beatmachine. I have beatmaker2 but doesnt gel with me (workflow). I think i am pretty set now with Samplr, this, and UVI Beathawk on the horizon.
The essential thing is that it has to be able to play along in sync with a project in our host of choice....if it uses IAA as a node within our host, I'm fine with that. If they use IAA technology to just host IAA apps within iMPC Pro, then it becomes much, much less useful. At the very least, they need to make iMPC Pro capable of being an IAA node.
To be truly honest there is no excuse. Everyone else can manage to implement AB yet somehow they can't manage. Hell even the smallest ios apps can manage and the bigger ones also. To ignore this again is simply rude. I will not stand for that given so many more who can manage to. The fact that they hide behind any excuse rather than admit their little pissing match is just annoying as hell anymore. I really hope they grow up and put their big boy pants on soon . Hey if playing with themselves is that important though , let them. I just do not want to play with them .
I agree that it is really annoying, and I don't disagree with you at all--Retronyms has basically given the Audiobus community the middle-finger from the beginning, and I'm tired of it. But I'm also tired of not having the equipment I need and want, and it is appearing that this app may be exactly what I've been wanting. Audiobus will not be going away. However, Audiobus itself will be incorporating IAA, and so in this case, I don't see it being as essential that the Audiobus SDK be used if it incorporates Apple's IAA node capability so that I can load it into my Cubasis app to play along with my other apps. I think even Sebastian and Mike see this as the way forward. IAA isn't going away, and it provides rock solid Sync for essential apps like Drum machines and sequencers. I think this is a battle that can't be won--as much as I dislike Retronyms...
To also assume you know every single angle that a company can think about when deciding to implement or not implement a feature in their product is also pretty foolish and rude...and whining about not getting your wish is pretty childish.
^ That.
I doubt they even realize they are in any sort of pissing contest- I bet it is pretty one-sided...
Personally, I feel Janet should be hosting these demos.
@Thomas said:
Yes, but then what about the 'no shaving until it's released' part?
@CalCutta said:
<
Stopping me from what? Your communication skills in this thread are awful. And it was your whining I was referring to.
Edit: So I see you edited your post. I want to point out, for the record, that you have made a bunch of negative assumptions about an app developer, of which you have no proof. This is an objective fact. The negative words you used to criticize the app developer is absolutely whining. If you can point out where I've whined about speculative unproven elements of any iOS app on this board, PM me with that and I'll apologize in this thread...
@CalCutta said:
I agree with that. I mean what is up with all the entitlement @Tritonman2?
Your inability to read is noted. I stated my feelings and you considered it whining.. I can ignore your inability to understand my position just as I can choose not to support the developer. Call it whining or call it whatever you choose. But all of your whining will not change my opinion. The only one who mentions entitlements would be you firejan82. That IS a fact. I stated my opinion and it stands thank you . Flame away.
@firejan82 said:
That part would be awesome too!
@Tritonman2
So you can't prove your assumption of Retronym's motives, then?
"The fact that they hide behind any excuse rather than admit their little pissing match is just annoying as hell anymore."
The first part of the above quote is directly from you, and is not a "feeling". That is an assumption. You assume you know Retronym's reasons for not implementing Audiobus to their iMPC apps. As I've already directly asked you to supply proof of their decisions, and you've failed to do so, I will assume that you are full of shit on this subject and move on.
I suggest the rest of the board to do the same...
To be fair with @Tritonman2, Retronyms ARE full of half truths and non-commitments. They even came to THIS site to do some damage control after they took over ACP that many of us who've been here from the beginning remember well. It's all documented here if you want to go search for it within these forums....I'm too lazy to look. :-) Nevertheless, they haven't been the best at giving customers warm fuzzy feelings that last... ;-) An entity usually has a specific reputation for a specific reason.....or at least some nugget of truth that originally started the reputation.
Ok, and if someone can supply that "nugget of truth", I'll accept it. However, the fact remains that there has been a ton of unproven speculation in regards iMPC Pro and it is quite troll-ish.
Also, frankly, there has been implication from Retronyms that at IAA will be implemented into iMPC pro (lots of i's there, hehe). Hell you pointed it out and I absolutely agree with ya 100% @Audiojunkie. As you already pointed out, it will be better if it's a Node implementation and I'm keeping my fingers crossed for it. I will just reiterate that the assumptions made in this thread by Tritonman are baseless and unnecessary. Wait until the damn app comes out before trashing it.
Yeah, it would probably be better for us to see what comes out. I'll say this though, integration into my setup is essential for a sale. Without that, I doubt I'll buy it.
That said, I AM hopeful! :-)
I'm sure you've already thought about this scenario, but if they do implement it as a Node app, you can do what I suggested here: http://forum.audiob.us/discussion/4376/using-non-ab-iaa-apps-in-ab#Item_1
@Tritonman2 well, english isn't my first language so maybe entitlement is not the word, I don't know. What I meant was you talking kinda like Retronyms owe you something.
@CalCutta said:
Not necessary, but thanks. :-) Seriously! If iMPC Pro implements IAA to allow it to be a node within Cubasis (or other hosts that support IAA nodes), then I'll be perfectly happy. IAA support works great within Cubasis.
It is only if iMPC Pro does what iMPC currently does and implements IAA in such a way as to only host IAA apps that I won't be happy. :-)
@firejan82 said:
That is exactly what I did not say.
I will not support them in that case is what I am saying. I feel they should do as they choose however I should do the same as should you and anyone else period. And yes entitlement is a word just not one I used nor implied in anyway.
@CalCutta said:
cant wait for this to come out ....seems pretty cool
@Tritonman2 said:
Learn how to quote posts properly.
@Tritonman2 said:
@Tritonman2 said:
Keep trying, you'll figure it out eventually...
Can you guys stop boring the rest of us and take it offline?
I don't think this type of interaction works very well offline.
The app is still a long way from release, all there is to do is speculate anyway....
I'm ok with the interaction. It's the attacking that I find irritating.