Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

I feel **a lot** better about my guitar playing after watching this video!

2»

Comments

  • @GovernorSilver said:
    One of these days, I'm gonna actually learn how to use the takes feature(s) in Ableton Live.

    I usually record my take on one track until I mess up. Then record another take on a different track, starting from where I messed up in the timeline.

    Another nod to Ableton, which I have, but I think I’m going to try to start using Cubasis 3 on the iPad.

    @espiegel123 said:

    @Gravitas said:

    Before I learnt how to solo on guitar I started singing
    the notes because the notes are always there.
    I always sing in my minds ear and play the notes.

    Yeah...so important. I wish that I had really gotten this when it was first explained to me when I was a kid.

    @mistercharlie wrote: "Sometimes (too rarely) when improvising, I hear the notes before I play them. That’s usually when some magic happens."

    A great tip that someone gave me that took me 30 years before I took literally enough to actually do it was to take a few minutes a day where you sing to yourself (either out loud or with your mind's voice/ear) and then visualize playing it then picking up your instrument and playing it -- and if you don't find the notes right away take your time finding them. If you do it a few minutes a day pretty much every day. Some people are good at this right away and some people are terrible at it -- but no matter how bad you are at it (I was terrible when I started), you will find that if you stick with it that you get pretty good at it. One of the key elements is giving your full attention to it -- because your brain is a black box and will make all kinds of connections it can make use of if you give it your full attention.

    Oh yeah, definitely important. I recognized this ability when I was a kid, and was probably the reason I started playing. I think it was 1981-1982 I remember it! I had the main riff from Ozzy’s Crazy Train in my head and I thought “I could play that!” So I told my mom I wanted an electric guitar for my birthday and the rest is history!

    He also suggested that whenever you listen to music that you spend some of the time, listening and imagining playing it.

    Haha you’re talking about so many nights as a kid laying back with headphones on listening to Van Halen 1 imagining that I was EVH jumping off of the Marshall stacks and getting all the girls!

    …and pretty much everything I’ve ever heard from that point on up through today lol

  • @Gravitas said:

    @espiegel123 said:

    @Gravitas said:

    Before I learnt how to solo on guitar I started singing
    the notes because the notes are always there.
    I always sing in my minds ear and play the notes.

    Yeah...so important. I wish that I had really gotten this when it was first explained to me when I was a kid.

    @mistercharlie wrote: "Sometimes (too rarely) when improvising, I hear the notes before I play them. That’s usually when some magic happens."

    A great tip that someone gave me that took me 30 years before I took literally enough to actually do it was to take a few minutes a day where you sing to yourself (either out loud or with your mind's voice/ear) and then visualize playing it then picking up your instrument and playing it -- and if you don't find the notes right away take your time finding them. If you do it a few minutes a day pretty much every day. Some people are good at this right away and some people are terrible at it -- but no matter how bad you are at it (I was terrible when I started), you will find that if you stick with it that you get pretty good at it. One of the key elements is giving your full attention to it -- because your brain is a black box and will make all kinds of connections it can make use of if you give it your full attention.

    I do this all the time hence why I mentioned
    singing solos before I learnt how to solo.
    Play the first note and sing it simultaneously.
    Practice with do-re-me if you haven't done it before.
    A more complex example would be George Benson
    when he solo's and sings the notes at the same time.

    Along the same lines he'd say, try trading licks with your self by singing a few notes and then playing them.

    Agreed.

    He also suggested that whenever you listen to music that you spend some of the time, listening and imagining playing it.

    Pick up the instrument and play along with it.
    That's the old school way.

    I think these are things that will help anyone for whom they aren't the natural course of things -- even if you only do it a few minutes per day (but doing 'em for real with full attention).

    All very good advice.

    Dittos!✌️

  • @Edward_Alexander said:

    I feel like I’m going back into battle, with my Axe, and armed with a ton more knowledge! 🤘

    Yeah, it's a good feeling. 🤘🏾

  • @royor said:

    • Mistakes + flubs can be golden.. don’t delete the take until you’ve actually listened to it in context.. (keep ‘em anyway until you’re done recording - space is cheap) You may be more than pleasantly surprised..

    Good point! Especially these days with all these Terabytes and such.

    • Sing along with the track + learn how to play those notes somewhere on your guitar.. great ear training exercise because the source is you - you’re not relying on licks, you’re focusing on melody.. and isn’t that the point?

    Exactly!

    • I still believe in capturing the moment.. the excitement + possibly still unknown direction.. 1st takes are usually magic.. it kind of starts to go downhill from there (at least for me)..

    I hear you. It’s true that sometimes when you listen back, to what you thought originally was a mistake or flub, can actually be a hint of a different direction you may not have thought of. I believe that sometimes great ideas can spawn from subtle mistakes, or things that just happen by accident.

  • @MadeofWax said:

    This is the only remaining ticket I have from one of the last shows my band played in Deep Ellum (one of Dallas's big music club circuits) a little over 30 years ago. Back then I played lead, sang, and wrote about half the songs we played. Únfortunately, thirty years of working in a manufacturing plant have taken their toll on my hands. I can only play for a short while without pain anymore. I was no virtuoso back then, but whenever the stage fright lifted and I could get in the zone I had a few moments I could be proud of. Most of the time I had the majority of my solo's mapped out with a few measures to improvise. As scary as those few measures were, that's where the magic was. At this point I'm grateful for apps like Riffler and Geoshred for giving me back some semblance of guitar playing. I know the kind of practice it would take to get back to where I was, and even if I had the time my hands just aren't up to the task anymore. Still, once in a while I can't fight the urge and I play a few bars until I have to put the guitar down. If I could go back and give myself advice, I would tell myself to practice what you suck at, and take better care of your hands.

    All sounds like great advice to me my friend. I’m 52 and worked for 30 years as a meat cutter so I feel you. It does suck getting old!

  • @NeuM said:

    @richardyot said:
    David Gilmour recorded multiple takes of the solo for Comfortably Numb, and then just used the faders to mix the best bits together:

    “I banged out five or six solos,” Gilmour says. “From there I just followed my usual procedure, which is to listen back to each solo and make a chart, noting which bits are good. Then, by following the chart, I create one great composite solo by whipping one fader up, then another fader, jumping from phrase to phrase until everything flows together. That’s the way we did it on ‘Comfortably Numb.’”

    http://rockandrollgarage.com/david-gilmour-reveals-how-he-made-the-solo-for-comfortably-numb/

    Thats pretty much sums up my method as well for music production. Get a large number of variations out quickly and find the "best" of each one for the final.

    Yeah, I’m going to try to start using Cubasis 3 for this kind of thing. I like the David Gilmour strategy mentioned above. Probably a widely known and used method I’m sure.

  • @michael_m said:
    It’s good to hear that Dave Gilmour takes that approach, as I often do that, or at least I have done that ever since I’ve had the luxury of enough tracks on a computer.

    I’ll play a few versions of solos and comp them into one good one, same as I do with vocal takes or sax solos. Some instruments it’s easy to get a good single take after a few attempts (piano or harmonica usually), but some just lend themselves to building a track that is a ‘best of’ from multiple run throughs.

    I’ve even lifted small pieces of solos out of one solo to replace an errant note or two from an otherwise good solo. As long as I cut accurately it usually works out pretty well.

    I believe it’s going to be a winning formula.

  • @JoyceRoadStudios said:
    One take solos are all the rage but many of your favorite solos were comped. I’m more in the Gilmour camp when it comes to actually putting down a solo in a project. And I like to record in pieces rather than whole takes. Even GarageBand makes it so easy, with its straightforward punch-in and count-in feature, to record pieces of solos or rhythm tracks on the same track, you don’t need to record an entire solo over and over or have 6 separate tracks of takes. GB and other DAWs that have the punch-in/count-in features are perfect for this type of tracking. I was amazed the first time I recorded one track in pieces and didn’t have to do any patching or fixing, it gets spliced together perfectly glitch free all on its own.

    So rather than worrying about one long perfect guitar take, I get inspired piece by piece to go anywhere I want and this end up regret free.

    Y’know, I can’t even remember the last time I tried Garageband. I have CB3, but now that you mention it, I think I’ll have to give GB a spin again!

    I’m an average guitarist

    I think I am as well?

    There was a time, before the internet, when I was in my teens, that people around my circles of people would have told you that I was going to be the next Eddie Van Halen. I never felt it, but my friends and family, and other bandmates insisted that I was great.

    Well, we all know the end of this story. The internet happened and suddenly we realize that there’s millions of people out there that are just as good as us, and there’s many, many that are way better. Shoot, some are even 5 year old kids lol

    So I don’t even try compete or compare any more. I’m happy just being average and I’m happy knowing that it doesn’t take “shredding skills” to compose beautiful music.

  • @TimRussell said:
    If you think the guitar is unforgiving try learning the violin…

    Good god you’re right!

    Ok, guitar is the 2nd most unforgiving instrument lol

  • @flo26 said:
    As a self taught guitar player,i used to play all day long along vinyls and cassettes.
    That has really forged my playing and my way of thinking about it.
    I don't like laborious things,so,i almost always record in one take,even if not perfect.
    Sure,it will depend on what i'm working on,but generally speaking,i'm a one take guy.
    I've never built a solo as Gilmour,which is definitely one of my faves,could do it.
    I can't work this way😉.
    The most important thing is : whatever your method,if it works,it works😉.
    Don't change anything.

    Thanks @flo26

    I think sometimes my problem is that I’ll try to overcomplicate things. (And I’m still guilty of it in the piece I posted above!) I’ve learned this by using apps like GeoShred or others where I might compose a “solo”.

    I need to keep reminding myself that sometimes “Less is More”! There’s pieces where a lead line of just two or three tasteful notes with something like a SWAM trumpet or my favorite GeoShred Tenor Sax can be all thats needed, just those three notes!

    I grab the guitar though, and for some reason, I want to play 37 notes 🤨

  • .......

    I’ve been trying to practice with a metronome lately. I will admit I tend to start getting bored playing real slow. And that’s another bad habit I have, is to rush through things. It doesn’t matter what it is, I speed to and from work, I rush through my meals, sometimes I think without even chewing, and I rush through pieces of music. I really need to work on this!

    ......

    My playing is pretty mediocre but I think I have become noticeably less mediocre over the past year. One quote from Michael League (bass player, composer and main arranger for Snarky Puppy) pulled things together for me when I watched a "master class" video. "As frustrating as it is to slow things down as much as I am suggesting, once you have mastered that thing you are working on -- you will have mastered it and it will apply in all kinds of situations and you won't have to learn it again. Whenever I have settled for "good enough" and not taken the time to slow it down and really nail it, I have ended up having to revisit whatever it is."

    Re playing slow, metronome and getting bored. Apologies if this is obvious and/or you already know this. You can practice slowly without a metronome (but it it is probably imperative to at least tap your foot). What I am suggesting is playing so slowly that getting the metronome that slow might even be a problem. (Now that I have been doing this for a while, I am also finding that when I do turn on the metronome that I fight with it less than I used to).

    I am in the same boat with you -- I am pretty impatient and struggle to keeping up my attention enough to play slowly especially REALLY slowly. But, I have made a ton of progress at that and have been surprised at how big of a difference it makes. I sometimes end up playing things many times slower than what I used to consider slow. It has been instructive to me to find out with some things how slowly I really have to play to be able to articulate the notes in the way that I want or have it be clean. It has improved my hearing even at tempo, too. I think it gives our brain a chance to fully register the connection between the sounds and what our muscles are doing and what our interior ear is hearing.

    I do occasional reality checks with a metronome but most of the time I don't -- ever since a world-class player I know said that using a metronome was such a drag for him that he could bring himself to practice if he used one -- but he also records himself a lot as a reality check. He thinks the best way to work on time is to play with musicians that are better than with you live and play along with records of people with great feel.

  • edited October 2021

    @Edward_Alexander said:

    @GovernorSilver said:
    One of these days, I'm gonna actually learn how to use the takes feature(s) in Ableton Live.

    I usually record my take on one track until I mess up. Then record another take on a different track, starting from where I messed up in the timeline.

    Another nod to Ableton, which I have, but I think I’m going to try to start using Cubasis 3 on the iPad.

    My technique of recording live playing to 2 tracks, as described in my previous post, is not unique to Ableton anyway. I used this technique on my previous DAWs - Digital Performer (the trial edition) and Logic. Long story short, don't take my post as an endorsement of Ableton Live.

    One thing I will be explore more in the future is recording my instrument tracks without FX first. Then later experiment with FX on the instrument tracks. The reason is I've added electric violin tracks to my friend's song, then when I hear back from her, she will sometimes say she wants more distortion, or less of it; or make the reverb a little less thick or whatever.

    The obvious problem is I have to re-record my parts (usually electric violin) all over again because the tracks were recorded with violin already processed with FX. That's a pain because I suck on violin worse than on guitar. Intonation is always a challenge. But the bow is one that really makes violin a bitch to play.

    The advantage of recording my violin parts dry: I won't have to waste time re-recording the actual violin playing. all over again. Instead, I can keep the existing violin audio and just make changes to the FX.

  • edited October 2021

    @Edward_Alexander said:
    All sounds like great advice to me my friend. I’m 52 and worked for 30 years as a meat cutter so I feel you. It does suck getting old!

    Generous of you to call my rambling "advice". 😁Your statements about practice brought a train of thought to mind and I had to let it run it's course. A few thoughts more in line with the discussion:
    Intros : Having listened to more than a few of your recordings I can tell you understand the importance of a good intro. When making a solo out of multiple recordings it never hurts to have multiple intro options.
    Flubs : As mentioned by others, if you plan on editing, play like you're playing live. If you miss a note keep going. Sometimes a wrong turn leads to a more interesting path.
    Editing :The great thing about building a solo is how much freedom you have with not only notes, but with timing. When you are assembling your parts, try turning off any snapping on the timeline and sliding your edited bits and pieces around. If you don't like it, undo is your best friend.

    I really enjoy listening to your tracks and watching your videos. I look forward to hearing the results of whatever this discussion spawns. Do take care of yourself (and your hands) Edward and just so you know, friends call me Mac.👍

  • @espiegel123 said:

    .......

    I’ve been trying to practice with a metronome lately. I will admit I tend to start getting bored playing real slow. And that’s another bad habit I have, is to rush through things. It doesn’t matter what it is, I speed to and from work, I rush through my meals, sometimes I think without even chewing, and I rush through pieces of music. I really need to work on this!

    ......

    My playing is pretty mediocre but I think I have become noticeably less mediocre over the past year. One quote from Michael League (bass player, composer and main arranger for Snarky Puppy) pulled things together for me when I watched a "master class" video. "As frustrating as it is to slow things down as much as I am suggesting, once you have mastered that thing you are working on -- you will have mastered it and it will apply in all kinds of situations and you won't have to learn it again. Whenever I have settled for "good enough" and not taken the time to slow it down and really nail it, I have ended up having to revisit whatever it is."

    Re playing slow, metronome and getting bored. Apologies if this is obvious and/or you already know this. You can practice slowly without a metronome (but it it is probably imperative to at least tap your foot). What I am suggesting is playing so slowly that getting the metronome that slow might even be a problem. (Now that I have been doing this for a while, I am also finding that when I do turn on the metronome that I fight with it less than I used to).

    I am in the same boat with you -- I am pretty impatient and struggle to keeping up my attention enough to play slowly especially REALLY slowly. But, I have made a ton of progress at that and have been surprised at how big of a difference it makes. I sometimes end up playing things many times slower than what I used to consider slow. It has been instructive to me to find out with some things how slowly I really have to play to be able to articulate the notes in the way that I want or have it be clean. It has improved my hearing even at tempo, too. I think it gives our brain a chance to fully register the connection between the sounds and what our muscles are doing and what our interior ear is hearing.

    I do occasional reality checks with a metronome but most of the time I don't -- ever since a world-class player I know said that using a metronome was such a drag for him that he could bring himself to practice if he used one -- but he also records himself a lot as a reality check. He thinks the best way to work on time is to play with musicians that are better than with you live and play along with records of people with great feel.

    I totally agree with him. Thats what I was saying above regarding playing with other people that have some talent. You learn a lot really fast playing with talented people. It rubs off on you, especially if they push you.

  • @GovernorSilver said:

    @Edward_Alexander said:

    @GovernorSilver said:
    One of these days, I'm gonna actually learn how to use the takes feature(s) in Ableton Live.

    I usually record my take on one track until I mess up. Then record another take on a different track, starting from where I messed up in the timeline.

    Another nod to Ableton, which I have, but I think I’m going to try to start using Cubasis 3 on the iPad.

    My technique of recording live playing to 2 tracks, as described in my previous post, is not unique to Ableton anyway. I used this technique on my previous DAWs - Digital Performer (the trial edition) and Logic. Long story short, don't take my post as an endorsement of Ableton Live.

    One thing I will be explore more in the future is recording my instrument tracks without FX first. Then later experiment with FX on the instrument tracks. The reason is I've added electric violin tracks to my friend's song, then when I hear back from her, she will sometimes say she wants more distortion, or less of it; or make the reverb a little less thick or whatever.

    The obvious problem is I have to re-record my parts (usually electric violin) all over again because the tracks were recorded with violin already processed with FX. That's a pain because I suck on violin worse than on guitar. Intonation is always a challenge. But the bow is one that really makes violin a bitch to play.

    The advantage of recording my violin parts dry: I won't have to waste time re-recording the actual violin playing. all over again. Instead, I can keep the existing violin audio and just make changes to the FX.

    Oh I know, I was just thinking I do have Ableton on my Windows PC, but I think I’m going to stick with the iPadOS platform and use Cubasis 3 for my DAW. I love how quiet this platform is.

    We’re going to leave the violin playing to you! lol

    But that is a smart way to record, without the effects. You can just add them in post, I get it. I think in some cases though, it would be hard for me anyway, to record dry, as sometimes the effects are part of the feeling. Like a delay. Playing the part dry to record you’d lose that feeling and end up with a track you’re not happy with, and adding the effects afterwards wouldn’t be the same.

  • @MadeofWax said:

    @Edward_Alexander said:
    All sounds like great advice to me my friend. I’m 52 and worked for 30 years as a meat cutter so I feel you. It does suck getting old!

    Generous of you to call my rambling "advice". 😁Your statements about practice brought a train of thought to mind and I had to let it run it's course. A few thoughts more in line with the discussion:
    Intros : Having listened to more than a few of your recordings I can tell you understand the importance of a good intro. When making a solo out of multiple recordings it never hurts to have multiple intro options.
    Flubs : As mentioned by others, if you plan on editing, play like you're playing live. If you miss a note keep going. Sometimes a wrong turn leads to a more interesting path.
    Editing :The great thing about building a solo is how much freedom you have with not only notes, but with timing. When you are assembling your parts, try turning off any snapping on the timeline and sliding your edited bits and pieces around. If you don't like it, undo is your best friend.

    I really enjoy listening to your tracks and watching your videos. I look forward to hearing the results of whatever this discussion spawns. Do take care of yourself (and your hands) Edward and just so you know, friends call me Mac.👍

    Thank you Mac, I appreciate that!

    I’ll have more to add to the discussion later, but right now I’m posting from the car, just got off work, and headed home to a hot shower!

  • edited October 2021

    I go in blind when I get a track to do for someone. Don’t listen first, just load it into Cubasis and hit record. I get my instinctual reaction and all the ideas I need from that one-take rough pass, then I just split them up into 2-3 guitars (if necessary), get my tones and effects just so, and nail them down in one more take each or section by section if there’s more advanced playing going on. Of course there’s a few retakes required here and there, but by and large, it’s still really efficient.

    It works incredibly well, better than you might think. You ARE better than you think when the pressure’s on. There’s a weird dichotomy when doing it: you tend to stick with what you know and do what you know well, but you also have room for spontaneity, playing free and loose like that with no time to think and trying to keep up with something you’ve never heard. Suprising playing tends to pop out. Plus, recording can get pretty stale after 2-3 listens of a song (especially if it’s not very good!) Get that stuff done unless you have a perfectly crafted masterpiece on your hands.

    I used to struggle on my own to get a satisfied guitar track. Serious, certified OCD stuff. Then one day, a friend whose music I didn’t really like asked me to do guitar for his album. Was able to not worry about the quality because I knew he was never gonna seriously put it out. I knocked out about 15 songs on guitar in a day and it actually made me feel more like a musician than ever, because the playing turned out quite good. Totally unlocked something in me, and this is still how I do tracks I do actually love and care about as well. Once you’ve heard a track in full and become familiar with it, the brain starts thinking too much and overtaking the original instincts. In my experience, that’s a bad thing.

    I suggest trying it once at the very least.

  • @michael_m said:
    It’s good to hear that Dave Gilmour takes that approach, as I often do that, or at least I have done that ever since I’ve had the luxury of enough tracks on a computer.

    I’ll play a few versions of solos and comp them into one good one, same as I do with vocal takes or sax solos. Some instruments it’s easy to get a good single take after a few attempts (piano or harmonica usually), but some just lend themselves to building a track that is a ‘best of’ from multiple run throughs.

    I’ve even lifted small pieces of solos out of one solo to replace an errant note or two from an otherwise good solo. As long as I cut accurately it usually works out pretty well.

    Comp takes are one of the best things that happened to me (I started recording when 8 track reel to reels were the standard).

    I used to go into the studio with a part totally 'perfected'. That would mean limiting it to something I could reliably reproduce. And I'm not even talking necessarily about an issue with overt mistakes...often it is just subtle things like, I want to pick this part near the bridge, and this part more near the neck or I want a perfect finger scrape here as I change positions.

    Comping, well also just that my time is less limited I suppose home recording, I will well and truly improvise. One tiny silly thing I started doing in comping a bunch of improvised looped takes was have a bar or two at the end where I'd yell a grade for the take. "A" "A-" "shit" "embarrassing." "insane, maybe good, maybe trash"

    That just saves a lot of time. Go back and listen just to each grade and highlight those for full listening, editing.

  • @oat_phipps said:
    I go in blind when I get a track to do for someone. Don’t listen first, just load it into Cubasis and hit record. I get my instinctual reaction and all the ideas I need from that one-take rough pass, then I just split them up into 2-3 guitars (if necessary), get my tones and effects just so, and nail them down in one more take each or section by section if there’s more advanced playing going on. Of course there’s a few retakes required here and there, but by and large, it’s still really efficient.

    It works incredibly well, better than you might think. You ARE better than you think when the pressure’s on. There’s a weird dichotomy when doing it: you tend to stick with what you know and do what you know well, but you also have room for spontaneity, playing free and loose like that with no time to think and trying to keep up with something you’ve never heard. Suprising playing tends to pop out. Plus, recording can get pretty stale after 2-3 listens of a song (especially if it’s not very good!) Get that stuff done unless you have a perfectly crafted masterpiece on your hands.

    I used to struggle on my own to get a satisfied guitar track. Serious, certified OCD stuff. Then one day, a friend whose music I didn’t really like asked me to do guitar for his album. Was able to not worry about the quality because I knew he was never gonna seriously put it out. I knocked out about 15 songs on guitar in a day and it actually made me feel more like a musician than ever, because the playing turned out quite good. Totally unlocked something in me, and this is still how I do tracks I do actually love and care about as well. Once you’ve heard a track in full and become familiar with it, the brain starts thinking too much and overtaking the original instincts. In my experience, that’s a bad thing.

    I suggest trying it once at the very least.

    This is great!

    I don’t think I’ve ever done a guitar track for someone else, or for a piece I haven’t already heard, so that is interesting.

    Actually, now that I typed that out, I remembered that I have done guitar for someone else’s stuff. (Recently and back in the day) This somehow just reminded me of this band I was in back in the 80s. We never did a studio record, but did do a 4 track demo tape EP that I guess we tried sending to the radio stations and record companies.

    The leader of this band was a lady by the name of Mary Wilkeson. She was Leon Wilkeson’s little sister. Leon (RIP), was the bass player for Rock & Roll hall of famers Lynyrd Skynyrd. I was 17-18 at the time and Mary was like 40 something, maybe even in her 50s I don’t know, I just remember thinking she was old as hell, BUT, being who her brother was, meant she had connections in the music biz, or so I thought.. and so she thought.

    We met as she lived in the downstairs apartment from us at this apartment complex we lived at. I had an acoustic guitar out on the balcony steps one day as she came walking by, complimented my playing and started singing along. She was one of those kinda “Gypsie” type of old cougars, you know, all spiritual, always wearing long colorful clothes, singer songwriter type. I really couldn’t stand Lynyrd Skynyrd at the time (still not a huge fan, but I’ve grown to appreciate their contributions to music) but when she explained who her brother was, I made no hesitations to join forces.

    Mary was another one of those people, back in the 80’s who thought I was some kind of guitar prodigy. She really believed in me… man, I wish I had a copy of that tape!

    And I have a loooong story about how I went on a trip to Texas to see Skynyrd play with Mary and Mary’s then boyfriend who was a biker/gangster and member of the Outlaws. The long and short of it is, that I’m lucky to be alive, and lucky to have survived those couple of days.

    Anyhoo, sorry about the rambling and trip down memory lane. Back to your suggestions, I do like the idea of going in blind, though everything I’ve been doing is for my own tracks that I’ve composed from the ground up. So there’s nothing blind when going in, but I have found it helpful to finish a backing, and just let it play at random times. I’ll play it in the car, or have it playing while I’m cooking, or even at work. The best place though, for me, I think, is at the end of the day, while I’m taking a hot shower, I’ll play my composed backing again, and here is where I feel like I come up with the best ideas. I’ll hum along and actually start singing out the guitar lead parts. By the time I’m out of the shower, and all dried off, I’m ready to do some recording.

  • @Multicellular said:

    @michael_m said:
    It’s good to hear that Dave Gilmour takes that approach, as I often do that, or at least I have done that ever since I’ve had the luxury of enough tracks on a computer.

    I’ll play a few versions of solos and comp them into one good one, same as I do with vocal takes or sax solos. Some instruments it’s easy to get a good single take after a few attempts (piano or harmonica usually), but some just lend themselves to building a track that is a ‘best of’ from multiple run throughs.

    I’ve even lifted small pieces of solos out of one solo to replace an errant note or two from an otherwise good solo. As long as I cut accurately it usually works out pretty well.

    Comp takes are one of the best things that happened to me (I started recording when 8 track reel to reels were the standard).

    I used to go into the studio with a part totally 'perfected'. That would mean limiting it to something I could reliably reproduce. And I'm not even talking necessarily about an issue with overt mistakes...often it is just subtle things like, I want to pick this part near the bridge, and this part more near the neck or I want a perfect finger scrape here as I change positions.

    Comping, well also just that my time is less limited I suppose home recording, I will well and truly improvise. One tiny silly thing I started doing in comping a bunch of improvised looped takes was have a bar or two at the end where I'd yell a grade for the take. "A" "A-" "shit" "embarrassing." "insane, maybe good, maybe trash"

    That just saves a lot of time. Go back and listen just to each grade and highlight those for full listening, editing.

    haha nice! I was just thinking about the amount of free time I have lately. Very slim, so it seems like I’m always in a rush to get things done as I’m always pressed for time. I’m actually looking forward to my retirement (only have about 15 years to go) where I’ll have all the time I want or need to “comp” aka do some “tracking”.

    I like the idea of the grading system, I’d have a couple categories “cringe” and “Meh” would be two lol

  • @Edward_Alexander said:

    @Multicellular said:

    @michael_m said:
    It’s good to hear that Dave Gilmour takes that approach, as I often do that, or at least I have done that ever since I’ve had the luxury of enough tracks on a computer.

    I’ll play a few versions of solos and comp them into one good one, same as I do with vocal takes or sax solos. Some instruments it’s easy to get a good single take after a few attempts (piano or harmonica usually), but some just lend themselves to building a track that is a ‘best of’ from multiple run throughs.

    I’ve even lifted small pieces of solos out of one solo to replace an errant note or two from an otherwise good solo. As long as I cut accurately it usually works out pretty well.

    Comp takes are one of the best things that happened to me (I started recording when 8 track reel to reels were the standard).

    I used to go into the studio with a part totally 'perfected'. That would mean limiting it to something I could reliably reproduce. And I'm not even talking necessarily about an issue with overt mistakes...often it is just subtle things like, I want to pick this part near the bridge, and this part more near the neck or I want a perfect finger scrape here as I change positions.

    Comping, well also just that my time is less limited I suppose home recording, I will well and truly improvise. One tiny silly thing I started doing in comping a bunch of improvised looped takes was have a bar or two at the end where I'd yell a grade for the take. "A" "A-" "shit" "embarrassing." "insane, maybe good, maybe trash"

    That just saves a lot of time. Go back and listen just to each grade and highlight those for full listening, editing.

    haha nice! I was just thinking about the amount of free time I have lately. Very slim, so it seems like I’m always in a rush to get things done as I’m always pressed for time. I’m actually looking forward to my retirement (only have about 15 years to go) where I’ll have all the time I want or need to “comp” aka do some “tracking”.

    I like the idea of the grading system, I’d have a couple categories “cringe” and “Meh” would be two lol

    meh has definitely been used. I'll have to add _cringe _to the scale. My band mates get a kick sometimes of the grading and that I label the takes as such. Sometimes I get down to a couple I can't decide between and give them a listen.

    "So dude.... it is between 'wtf' and 'lol wtf?'"

  • @Edward_Alexander said:
    We’re going to leave the violin playing to you! lol

    But that is a smart way to record, without the effects. You can just add them in post, I get it. I think in some cases though, it would be hard for me anyway, to record dry, as sometimes the effects are part of the feeling. Like a delay. Playing the part dry to record you’d lose that feeling and end up with a track you’re not happy with, and adding the effects afterwards wouldn’t be the same.

    Fair points.

    Also, the effects cover up the imperfections in my violin tone, which is controlled by the bow. As long as my parts are in tune with the rest of the song, less than great bowing tone is covered up by distortion, reverb, etc.

    My friend's music is not structured for loose jamming. So I only "improvise" my violin part when I'm composing it for a song, because improvisation is composition done quickly, and composition is improvisation done slowly, with more deliberation. I record my part after I've decided I've finished composing it.

    I'm looser with my own stuff. It's just that I learned over time to be more cautious when approaching music written by someone else. Some songwriters can have strong emotional attachments to their work. Some are really laid back and do not seem to care to what directions other people take their music. And quite a few are somewhere in between.

  • @GovernorSilver
    I’m probably in the somewhere in between category. Of course it depends on the piece too, like this track I composed in dedication to a friend that passed; I’d rather not have anyone mess with that one.

  • @Edward_Alexander said:

    Of course it depends on the piece too,

    Agreed.

    like this track I composed in dedication to a friend that passed; I’d rather not have anyone mess with that one.

    Your friend would’ve enjoyed listening
    to the track and reading this thread.

    Sorry to hear of your loss.
    My condolences.

    🙏🏾

  • @Edward_Alexander said:

    But that is a smart way to record, without the effects. You can just add them in post, I get it. I think in some cases though, it would be hard for me anyway, to record dry, as sometimes the effects are part of the feeling. Like a delay. Playing the part dry to record you’d lose that feeling and end up with a track you’re not happy with, and adding the effects afterwards wouldn’t be the same.

    I’m sure you’re fully aware that you can record a dry track + monitor the fx (or record to a separate track) at the same time..

    Not committing to a particular sound at the time of the recording can be a blessing + curse..
    Yes, you can change your mind and your sound completely + keep trying different settings or setups.. BUT.. that’s also the curse.. you can change your mind and you could tweak endlessly + maybe never find the sound that you’re searching for.. too many options can waste too much time..

    I like to commit as much as possible (sound-wise) to the track being recorded.. as you mentioned, the inspiration + feeling comes from what you’re hearing RIGHT NOW.. NOT LATER.. of course YMMV.. 😁

  • @Gravitas said:

    @Edward_Alexander said:

    Of course it depends on the piece too,

    Agreed.

    like this track I composed in dedication to a friend that passed; I’d rather not have anyone mess with that one.

    Your friend would’ve enjoyed listening
    to the track and reading this thread.

    Sorry to hear of your loss.
    My condolences.

    🙏🏾

    Thank you my friend

  • @royor said:

    @Edward_Alexander said:

    But that is a smart way to record, without the effects. You can just add them in post, I get it. I think in some cases though, it would be hard for me anyway, to record dry, as sometimes the effects are part of the feeling. Like a delay. Playing the part dry to record you’d lose that feeling and end up with a track you’re not happy with, and adding the effects afterwards wouldn’t be the same.

    I’m sure you’re fully aware that you can record a dry track + monitor the fx (or record to a separate track) at the same time..

    Not committing to a particular sound at the time of the recording can be a blessing + curse..
    Yes, you can change your mind and your sound completely + keep trying different settings or setups.. BUT.. that’s also the curse.. you can change your mind and you could tweak endlessly + maybe never find the sound that you’re searching for.. too many options can waste too much time..

    I like to commit as much as possible (sound-wise) to the track being recorded.. as you mentioned, the inspiration + feeling comes from what you’re hearing RIGHT NOW.. NOT LATER.. of course YMMV.. 😁

    I’m aware. And you’re right about the curse.

    And you’re right about the effects inspiring the performance.

  • @Multicellular said:

    @Edward_Alexander said:

    @Multicellular said:

    @michael_m said:
    It’s good to hear that Dave Gilmour takes that approach, as I often do that, or at least I have done that ever since I’ve had the luxury of enough tracks on a computer.

    I’ll play a few versions of solos and comp them into one good one, same as I do with vocal takes or sax solos. Some instruments it’s easy to get a good single take after a few attempts (piano or harmonica usually), but some just lend themselves to building a track that is a ‘best of’ from multiple run throughs.

    I’ve even lifted small pieces of solos out of one solo to replace an errant note or two from an otherwise good solo. As long as I cut accurately it usually works out pretty well.

    Comp takes are one of the best things that happened to me (I started recording when 8 track reel to reels were the standard).

    I used to go into the studio with a part totally 'perfected'. That would mean limiting it to something I could reliably reproduce. And I'm not even talking necessarily about an issue with overt mistakes...often it is just subtle things like, I want to pick this part near the bridge, and this part more near the neck or I want a perfect finger scrape here as I change positions.

    Comping, well also just that my time is less limited I suppose home recording, I will well and truly improvise. One tiny silly thing I started doing in comping a bunch of improvised looped takes was have a bar or two at the end where I'd yell a grade for the take. "A" "A-" "shit" "embarrassing." "insane, maybe good, maybe trash"

    That just saves a lot of time. Go back and listen just to each grade and highlight those for full listening, editing.

    haha nice! I was just thinking about the amount of free time I have lately. Very slim, so it seems like I’m always in a rush to get things done as I’m always pressed for time. I’m actually looking forward to my retirement (only have about 15 years to go) where I’ll have all the time I want or need to “comp” aka do some “tracking”.

    I like the idea of the grading system, I’d have a couple categories “cringe” and “Meh” would be two lol

    meh has definitely been used. I'll have to add _cringe _to the scale. My band mates get a kick sometimes of the grading and that I label the takes as such. Sometimes I get down to a couple I can't decide between and give them a listen.

    "So dude.... it is between 'wtf' and 'lol wtf?'"

    I have sometimes even lifted a piece from a take and used it twice in the same solo, particularly if it’s only replacing a small error with a note or two that sound much better.

  • @Edward_Alexander said:
    @GovernorSilver
    I’m probably in the somewhere in between category. Of course it depends on the piece too, like this track I composed in dedication to a friend that passed; I’d rather not have anyone mess with that one.

    Condolences on the passing of your friend.

  • @Edward_Alexander said:

    But that is a smart way to record, without the effects. You can just add them in post, I get it. I think in some cases though, it would be hard for me anyway, to record dry, as sometimes the effects are part of the feeling. Like a delay. Playing the part dry to record you’d lose that feeling and end up with a track you’re not happy with, and adding the effects afterwards wouldn’t be the same.

    I agree; the wet sound is a part of the performance and sometimes can’t be recreated in the mix. But you can record both a wet and a dry track.

Sign In or Register to comment.