Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

DRAMBO Version 2 General Discussion

1…575859606163»

Comments

  • genmcegenmce
    edited December 2024

    @rs2000 said:

    @genmce said:

    @qqq said:
    Drambo's MIDI feedback should support any controller that does feedback via CC or Notes with the same value as the controller sends out, which my understanding is most of them. So if you have an APC 40 or something it should work as well.

    I've got an apc-40 (the old one). I would love to get it setup and working with Drambo. Where should I start or is this feature out of beta yet?

    Hard to say. Can you link to a MIDI spec of the APC40?

    Here is a document with midi spec https://cdn.inmusicbrands.com/akai/apc40/APC40_Communications_Protocol_rev_1.pdf_1db97c1fdba23bacf47df0f9bf64e913.pdf

    Here is a guy mapping apc40 to AUM
    and the mozaic files for it https://github.com/juanlittledevil/Mozaic-Scripts/tree/master

  • qqqqqq

    @rs2000 said:
    Hard to say. Can you link to a MIDI spec of the APC40?

    I've done mappings of the APC40 before, they do everything with CC/Notes and a splash of Sysex for configs. So it should work with the path Drambo is taking.

  • supadomsupadom

    I finally got to play with the new spectral filter.

    So good to finally have a 32 band graphic equaliser!

  • rs2000rs2000

    @qqq said:

    @rs2000 said:
    Hard to say. Can you link to a MIDI spec of the APC40?

    I've done mappings of the APC40 before, they do everything with CC/Notes and a splash of Sysex for configs. So it should work with the path Drambo is taking.

    Thanks 👍🏼

  • LorichsLorichs

    It is w> @supadom said:

    I finally got to play with the new spectral filter.

    So good to finally have a 32 band graphic equaliser!
    png "")

    it is wired. First tried the spectral filter with only one oscillator and it worked fine.
    Then i deleted the filter and made this patch. When the spectral filter is enabled all sound is cut also for ch 2. The same happens if i enable the spectral filter on ch 2. (The sound is cut on ch 1+2)

  • GravitasGravitas

    @Lorichs said:
    It is w> @supadom said:

    I finally got to play with the new spectral filter.

    So good to finally have a 32 band graphic equaliser!
    png "")

    it is wired. First tried the spectral filter with only one oscillator and it worked fine.
    Then i deleted the filter and made this patch. When the spectral filter is enabled all sound is cut also for ch 2. The same happens if i enable the spectral filter on ch 2. (The sound is cut on ch 1+2)

    Is this reproducable every time?
    If so can you send the file to [email protected] with full description please.

  • SamuSamu

    @Gravitas said:

    @Lorichs said:
    It is w> @supadom said:

    I finally got to play with the new spectral filter.

    So good to finally have a 32 band graphic equaliser!
    png "")

    it is wired. First tried the spectral filter with only one oscillator and it worked fine.
    Then i deleted the filter and made this patch. When the spectral filter is enabled all sound is cut also for ch 2. The same happens if i enable the spectral filter on ch 2. (The sound is cut on ch 1+2)

    Is this reproducable every time?
    If so can you send the file to [email protected] with full description please.

    I don't recall the Spectral Filter ever being 'polyphonic'?!

  • pedropedro

    @Samu said:
    I don't recall the Spectral Filter ever being 'polyphonic'?!

    Haven’t really tested it that far, but it should be polyphonic. Unless Giku forgot the little (1) icon.
    Nevertheless it’s a great addition to have a multi band paragraphic EQ on drambo. Even if it’s monophonic it’s so helpful to separate sounds into their own bands with total flexibility.
    Totally support smaller buffer sizes than the currently available, but that has been requested already

  • SamuSamu

    @pedro said:

    @Samu said:
    I don't recall the Spectral Filter ever being 'polyphonic'?!

    Haven’t really tested it that far, but it should be polyphonic. Unless Giku forgot the little (1) icon.
    Nevertheless it’s a great addition to have a multi band paragraphic EQ on drambo. Even if it’s monophonic it’s so helpful to separate sounds into their own bands with total flexibility.
    Totally support smaller buffer sizes than the currently available, but that has been requested already

    The problem would be that at smaller buffer sizes the resolution would drastically go down as the buffer is needed for the FFT calculations. All spectral effects add a fair bit of delay/latency, there's no way around it as an app can't 'predict the future' for 100% real-time usage...

  • pedropedro

    @Samu said:

    @pedro said:

    @Samu said:
    I don't recall the Spectral Filter ever being 'polyphonic'?!

    Haven’t really tested it that far, but it should be polyphonic. Unless Giku forgot the little (1) icon.
    Nevertheless it’s a great addition to have a multi band paragraphic EQ on drambo. Even if it’s monophonic it’s so helpful to separate sounds into their own bands with total flexibility.
    Totally support smaller buffer sizes than the currently available, but that has been requested already

    The problem would be that at smaller buffer sizes the resolution would drastically go down as the buffer is needed for the FFT calculations. All spectral effects add a fair bit of delay/latency, there's no way around it as an app can't 'predict the future' for 100% real-time usage...

    Sure, but it’s another way to make crazy sounds 🤷‍♂️

  • supadomsupadom

    I guess I’m partly to blame for thinking that spectral filter would be a graphic eq equivalent.

    I just fired it up and made that assumption but I hardly ever think of things like poly or transparent. 🙄

  • yonhorizonyonhorizon

    I wish for three things

    A colorize option for the horizontal track squares

    Some kind of global midi mapping, like in ableton, that you just map the controller to “macros” and then it will modify the “selected” rack or device.. maybe in drambo it can just modify the mapped controls chronologically
    That would be amazing

    Better export option.. ableton set export would be amazing

  • GravitasGravitas

    @Samu said:

    @Gravitas said:

    @Lorichs said:
    It is w> @supadom said:

    I finally got to play with the new spectral filter.

    So good to finally have a 32 band graphic equaliser!
    png "")

    it is wired. First tried the spectral filter with only one oscillator and it worked fine.
    Then i deleted the filter and made this patch. When the spectral filter is enabled all sound is cut also for ch 2. The same happens if i enable the spectral filter on ch 2. (The sound is cut on ch 1+2)

    Is this reproducable every time?
    If so can you send the file to [email protected] with full description please.

    I don't recall the Spectral Filter ever being 'polyphonic'?!

    I thought it was polyphonic from the off.

    @pedro said:

    @Samu said:

    @pedro said:

    @Samu said:
    I don't recall the Spectral Filter ever being 'polyphonic'?!

    Haven’t really tested it that far, but it should be polyphonic. Unless Giku forgot the little (1) icon.
    Nevertheless it’s a great addition to have a multi band paragraphic EQ on drambo. Even if it’s monophonic it’s so helpful to separate sounds into their own bands with total flexibility.
    Totally support smaller buffer sizes than the currently available, but that has been requested already

    The problem would be that at smaller buffer sizes the resolution would drastically go down as the buffer is needed for the FFT calculations. All spectral effects add a fair bit of delay/latency, there's no way around it as an app can't 'predict the future' for 100% real-time usage...

    Sure, but it’s another way to make crazy sounds 🤷‍♂️

    Agreed for sure in regards to crazy sounds.

  • GravitasGravitas

    @yonhorizon said:
    I wish for three things

    A colorize option for the horizontal track squares

    Though we don't have colorize we can label each CLIP.

    Some kind of global midi mapping, like in ableton, that you just map the controller to “macros” and then it will modify the “selected” rack or device.. maybe in drambo it can just modify the mapped controls chronologically
    That would be amazing

    This is what @giku_beepstreet and the Beta Team are focused on right now.
    Bidirectional midi feedback is on the horizon.

  • LorichsLorichs

    @Gravitas
    I have not been able to reproduce. I recall that i used airpods pro 2 when i fors experienced this issue.
    I would not say that it had something to do with polyphony. More that the audio was affected on more than one channel in question.

    Anyway. When i tried the project again the audio seemed to work ok. But enabling the spectral filter has this wired influence on the timing.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/BRsn4M9hFO4?si=pRu9S3Zqp4eez2h-

    Maybe you give me a hint of what is going on before i write to beep street.

  • GravitasGravitas

    @Lorichs said:
    @Gravitas
    I have not been able to reproduce. I recall that i used airpods pro 2 when i fors experienced this issue.
    I would not say that it had something to do with polyphony. More that the audio was affected on more than one channel in question.

    Anyway. When i tried the project again the audio seemed to work ok. But enabling the spectral filter has this wired influence on the timing.

    I would still suggest that you write to Beepstreet with the issue.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/BRsn4M9hFO4?si=pRu9S3Zqp4eez2h-

    Maybe you give me a hint of what is going on before i write to beep street.

    The "wired" influence is the added latency when using the Spectral Filter module.
    There's been a request to add lower buffer sizes so we shall be seeing improvements in that regards by the next update.

  • LorichsLorichs

    Thanks @gravitas.
    I’ll report to beepstreet.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2025