Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

«1

Comments

  • @Danny_Mammy I dont have a P3S, I do love me some NUCs.....so i cant leave alone with these crickets.
    Very interesting turn of events.

  • edited July 2023

    Ableton's unofficial statement about this recent development:

    "Unfortunately due to the recent announcement by Intel about discontinuing their NUC chips, we will no longer be able to sell Push 3 Standalone units. As such, starting tomorrow at 5:40AM we will stop accepting orders for these units. All customers who have pre-ordered a Push 3 Standalone, will instead be shipped a special edition Push 2 unit painted in a rare "Irate Red" color scheme. Each special edition Push 2 will come with 4 AA batteries that you can use in any device you want.

    We're sorry for this inconvenience, and we can't wait to show you what we have in store for Push 4. It's our most magical device ever."

    (this was a joke for those of you with nonsense of humor)

  • I guess the other option is
    “We will update all outstanding orders to ryzen threadrippers free of charge. Unfortunately, due to the extra heat, we will need to ship you a larger heat sink. To fit this heat sink, just remove the battery and usb port board….”

  • edited July 2023

    Man hope it isn’t this NUC that they use (but i think it is):

    u

  • edited July 2023

    IMO, more and more future devices will run on ARM processors with lower power consumption at potentially lower prices.
    Not a big loss, considering that they've already announced Push 4.

  • edited July 2023

    @echoopera said:
    Man hope it isn’t this NUC that they use (but i think it is):

    one thing is for sure intel are out so no future Deveopment with NUC . i guess other companies can make the existing NUC at their own prices.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @rs2000 said:
    IMO, more and more future devices will run on ARM processors with lower power consumption at potentially lower prices.
    Not a big loss, considering that they've already announced Push 4.

    Yeah, I don't get why companies keep choosing Intel. First Maschine+, now Push. Just use ARM for mobile devices.

  • @auxmux said:

    @rs2000 said:
    IMO, more and more future devices will run on ARM processors with lower power consumption at potentially lower prices.
    Not a big loss, considering that they've already announced Push 4.

    Yeah, I don't get why companies keep choosing Intel. First Maschine+, now Push. Just use ARM for mobile devices.

    I agree. Surely before these companies start development they do an assessment of the long term availability of parts.

  • @rs2000 said:
    Not a big loss, considering that they've already announced Push 4.

    🤦🏼‍♂️

    Sigh, that was a joke people.

  • edited July 2023

    At $1999, wouldn't it be better to get a high-spec touchscreen laptop anyway, where you can install any software you want, including any full DAW and any control surface app you want, and get far better battery life? (sorry, I'm a very simple man and just love to bust parties... 😁)

  • edited July 2023

    A kick in the NUC's for Ableton.... see what i did there ;)

  • @SevenSystems said:
    At $1999, wouldn't it be better to get a high-spec touchscreen laptop anyway, where you can install any software you want, including any full DAW and any control surface app you want, and get far better battery life? (sorry, I'm a very simple man and just love to bust parties... 😁)

    It wouldn’t have the deep level of integration unfortunately.

  • @cyberheater said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    At $1999, wouldn't it be better to get a high-spec touchscreen laptop anyway, where you can install any software you want, including any full DAW and any control surface app you want, and get far better battery life? (sorry, I'm a very simple man and just love to bust parties... 😁)

    It wouldn’t have the deep level of integration unfortunately.

    But that is purely a software problem. So I guess there's a market for such an integrated solution, and I could sell it for $1000 per copy 😄

  • @cyberheater said:

    @SevenSystems said:
    At $1999, wouldn't it be better to get a high-spec touchscreen laptop anyway, where you can install any software you want, including any full DAW and any control surface app you want, and get far better battery life? (sorry, I'm a very simple man and just love to bust parties... 😁)

    It wouldn’t have the deep level of integration unfortunately.

    Bitwig's touch interface/mode is amazing. What sucks about it is the selection of hardware available in windows tablets/touchscreens. The integration isn't the issue.

  • @Tarekith said:

    @rs2000 said:
    Not a big loss, considering that they've already announced Push 4.

    🤦🏼‍♂️

    Sigh, that was a joke people.

    Oops 😂
    But wouldn't development of the next Push generation be the logical consequence anyway?

  • that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

  • @panthera86 said:
    that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

    Yeah, they’re either gonna be worthless or dragon’s teeth… I’m loving mine still, all the more since I got the iPad hooked up through ADAT…

  • @SevenSystems said:
    At $1999, wouldn't it be better to get a high-spec touchscreen laptop anyway, where you can install any software you want, including any full DAW and any control surface app you want, and get far better battery life? (sorry, I'm a very simple man and just love to bust parties... 😁)

    Push 3 controller+MacBook Air?

  • edited July 2023

    @SevenSystems said:
    At $1999, wouldn't it be better to get a high-spec touchscreen laptop anyway, where you can install any software you want, including any full DAW and any control surface app you want, and get far better battery life? (sorry, I'm a very simple man and just love to bust parties... 😁)

    Seriously! These devices are cool and the software/hardware integration is “seamless” but, 2.5 hours of battery time??? And that’s 2.5 hours of advertised battery life, which makes me think that it’s possibly lower. It’s a NO from me, dawg. 😁

  • Battery life totally dependent on how busy your projects are, I've gotten more than 2.5 hrs here with my typically more scaled back projects.

  • edited July 2023

    welp..

  • edited July 2023

    @panthera86 said:
    that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

    I assume other companies will step in to fill the gap (small profit for a big company like Intel) , which would result in better pricing
    edit , other manufacturers will continue to develop NUC chipsets .

    Porting to ARM would be difficult ,but it would be way better in terms of hardware flexibility, price and power consumption

  • I don't think it's so much that Ableton didn't look forward enough. I think Intel, being the foundry and producing the chips, has historically assisted in hardware development and provides low-cost hardware with future price & availability assurances. With ARM, you pay someone to develop the hardware and then procure the commodity components (which are subject to highly variable price and availability pressure) and organize production. It is much more difficult for an enterprise that doesn't do much hardware development.

  • @Tarekith said:
    Battery life totally dependent on how busy your projects are, I've gotten more than 2.5 hrs here with my typically more scaled back projects.

    In regards to battery life can you connect a usb powerbank to extend the time or can it just be used for re-charging?

  • edited July 2023

    Yes you can extend the time with a battery bank. No idea how much that gains you in use though, not something I’ve had a need to do yet.

  • @Korakios said:

    @panthera86 said:
    that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

    I assume other companies will step in to fill the gap (small profit for a big company like Intel) , which would result in better pricing
    edit , other manufacturers will continue to develop NUC chipsets .

    Porting to ARM would be difficult ,but it would be way better in terms of hardware flexibility, price and power consumption

    Live already runs on Arm.

  • @drez said:

    @Korakios said:

    @panthera86 said:
    that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

    I assume other companies will step in to fill the gap (small profit for a big company like Intel) , which would result in better pricing
    edit , other manufacturers will continue to develop NUC chipsets .

    Porting to ARM would be difficult ,but it would be way better in terms of hardware flexibility, price and power consumption

    Live already runs on Arm.

    I suppose you mean the custom ARM M1 chip from apple

  • @Korakios said:

    @drez said:

    @Korakios said:

    @panthera86 said:
    that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

    I assume other companies will step in to fill the gap (small profit for a big company like Intel) , which would result in better pricing
    edit , other manufacturers will continue to develop NUC chipsets .

    Porting to ARM would be difficult ,but it would be way better in terms of hardware flexibility, price and power consumption

    Live already runs on Arm.

    I suppose you mean the custom ARM M1 chip from apple

    Yeah, ARM for hardware would be different. Might be easier to run full Ableton on iOS, hmmm.

  • edited July 2023

    @auxmux said:

    @Korakios said:

    @drez said:

    @Korakios said:

    @panthera86 said:
    that escalated quick..
    so will the Push3 Standalone be in a blow out sale?
    or will become a mythological device?

    I assume other companies will step in to fill the gap (small profit for a big company like Intel) , which would result in better pricing
    edit , other manufacturers will continue to develop NUC chipsets .

    Porting to ARM would be difficult ,but it would be way better in terms of hardware flexibility, price and power consumption

    Live already runs on Arm.

    I suppose you mean the custom ARM M1 chip from apple

    Yeah, ARM for hardware would be different. Might be easier to run full Ableton on iOS, hmmm.

    Why would it be different? ARM instruction sets are ARM instruction sets. When I run docker containers on my M1, I use ARM images, because the VM that is running underneath is…ARM.

    The Push Standalone is already running Linux. I don’t feel like porting it over would be a major chore at all.

Sign In or Register to comment.