Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

AI-generated posters and album covers

1235»

Comments

  • edited November 15

    @looperboy

    I find it funny that someone (or something) referencing Dan McQuillan and Emily M. Bender, who both are concerned about loss of humanity to AI, responds here in a way that a nasty AI bot would (Hmmmm?).

    Enjoy your intellectual prowess over poor idiot children like me. No need for conversations. Just name drop and name call.

    Cheers

  • edited November 16

    @reezygle said:

    >

    I find it funny that someone (or something) referencing Dan McQuillan and Emily M. Bender, who both are concerned about loss of humanity to AI, responds here in a way that a nasty AI bot would (Hmmmm?).

    Enjoy your intellectual prowess over poor idiot children like me. No need for conversations. Just name drop and name call.

    Cheers

    Hmmm, maybe the message here was that people should simply make a living now by writing anti-AI books.

  • @krassmann said:
    Fast forward almost a year to November 2024. AI video seriously entered arts territory. Scary but great. The lightning, the set details with its dirt and chaos.

    https://x.com/DrClownPhD/status/1855940765165273578

    Just found out about this AI creator a few days ago. Their work has really been blowing up. The kind of disturbing, surreal videos this person makes is perfect for music videos.

  • edited November 16

    As a parody of culture that is not you friend, using ai/ml to create grotesque stereotypes that exaggerate the cultural biases, is a great way to use it. I would love to train a model only on 80’s adverts and then style transfer it over telletubbies or Disney.. lol. Anyone trained thier own models? Advice?

  • @jollyDodger said:
    As a parody of culture that is not you friend, using ai/ml to create grotesque stereotypes that exaggerate the cultural biases, is a great way to use it. I would love to train a model only on 80’s adverts and then style transfer it over telletubbies or Disney.. lol. Anyone trained thier own models? Advice?

    For Stable Diffusion you can finetune models and train Lora on local hardware or via online services. You can also achieve a lot of things similar to what you want without training via image to image and Control Net, using things like IP Adapter.

  • edited November 16

    I have a 3090 for work and installed comfyUI for fun. But I find most models are trained on expensive but generic cultural fodder. Not looked into training a still model yet. CivitAI appears to have models on it that people have trained at home - I.e. on a single artists work..

    Edit: spelling ta+ NeuM

  • @jollyDodger said:
    I have a 3090 for work and installed comfyUI for fun. But I find most models are trained on expensive but generic cultural fodder. Not looked into training a still model yet. CivicAI appears to have models on it that people have trained at home - I.e. on a single artists work..

    That’s “Civitai”, not Civicai.

  • I quite like this ai art I “made” for my all-women new wave trio. But generally I’m a bit fatigued by AI being rammed down my throat.

    I work as a children’s book illustrator and often I get self-publishing authors asking me to work for them because the illustrator they originally hired used AI and they didn’t like the result, and then they hand me a story that was written by AI (and I know this, because I asked it once to write lyrics for me and it pretty much used the exact same sentences). I was approached by a company that said I could train an ai model on my own artwork. But if I can churn out a 32 page picture book in a day, does that really have any value any more? How much could I charge for such a thing?

    The truth is, the usefulness of AI might help me imagine the scene in a different way but in the end I would want to draw it myself. I am seriously concerned about the misinformation we’re going to have to deal with, not to mention that AI will take over the creative work and in my late 50s I’m going to have to find a job as a dishwasher to support myself.

  • edited November 16

    @girlvsworld said:

    I quite like this ai art I “made” for my all-women new wave trio. But generally I’m a bit fatigued by AI being rammed down my throat.

    I work as a children’s book illustrator and often I get self-publishing authors asking me to work for them because the illustrator they originally hired used AI and they didn’t like the result, and then they hand me a story that was written by AI (and I know this, because I asked it once to write lyrics for me and it pretty much used the exact same sentences). I was approached by a company that said I could train an ai model on my own artwork. But if I can churn out a 32 page picture book in a day, does that really have any value any more? How much could I charge for such a thing?

    The truth is, the usefulness of AI might help me imagine the scene in a different way but in the end I would want to draw it myself. I am seriously concerned about the misinformation we’re going to have to deal with, not to mention that AI will take over the creative work and in my late 50s I’m going to have to find a job as a dishwasher to support myself.

    How do you charge a company for a 32-page book in a day? You charge them for your (presumably) decades of experience which helped to train your "AI assistant". They're paying for you, not the AI.

    I love this story of a conversation between famous Art Director / Graphic Designer Paul Rand and Steve Jobs when Jobs commissioned Rand to design the logo for his company NeXT Computers:

    “I will solve your problem and you will pay me,” he told Jobs. “You can use what I produce or not, but I will not do options, and either way you will pay me.” And it would cost $100,000.

    Two weeks later, Rand flew back and presented his solution in the form of a book walking Jobs through the rationale. Jobs loved it but asked for the yellow of the ‘e’ to be brighter. According to Isaacson, “Rand banged his fist and declared, ‘I’ve been doing this for fifty years and I know what I’m doing.’ Jobs relented.”

  • @NeuM said:

    Yeah sure, I can ask for what I’m worth but the point is AI has devalued that work.

  • @girlvsworld said:

    @NeuM said:

    Yeah sure, I can ask for what I’m worth but the point is AI has devalued that work.

    Are you able to train your own generative art system and then have it generate satisfactory results? Are your clients happy? Then your work has not been devalued.

Sign In or Register to comment.