Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
+1
miRack is like virtual eurorack (imitation of real hardware)
audulus is closer to computer-only idea of modular like reaktor/puredata
different approaches and designs
imho
I have to say, I'm a heavy user of Audulus, but not at this price subscription.
I'm going to use until the next update. No subs for me.
+1
I don't think you have to worry about that. As mentioned earlier, if you already purchased the app, you will not have to pay subscription.
I suppose if an Audulus 5 came out as a separate app you'd be stuck at Audulus 4. But it wouldn't make sense to go that route when the whole purpose of making it subscription going forward is to try to make Audulus 4 sustainable for the future.
I'm planning on it! There's going to be a LOT of AUv3 polish coming next year.
Give the free version a try! it's great for casual users
If you've already bought it, you don't need to worry about the update. You won't lose anything
But would Audulus 4 users who have already paid only have a subscription option when Audulus 5 is released?
I haven't thought that far ahead. I don't know if Audulus 5 would be a separate app or just an update.
One thing to add (unless I’m mistaken) the AUV3 is only available in fully unlocked mode as well.
Daaaang... Had to wait until I had a compatible device to buy, and now that I have one, I see Audulus has become sub only if not already owned. Happy April Fools to me.
Best of luck to the dev either way.
I do not make the kind of money to have a sub for every instrument, effect, and DAW. The developers that want to use subscriptions need to collaborate and do a bundle thing if they want it to be somewhat logical and feasible
An awful lot of the app is usable without the subscription. If one wouldn’t use it a lot, you can subscribe only in months where you will be actively developing projects.
Indeed!
What is the impact on people who purchased previously?
None
So they have chosen death.
?
I’m assuming Saruman’s quote when Gandalf is given the ultimatum to side with him or die. Was a meme for quite some time too.
I was too late to the party, only got Audulus 3.
I've read in a review that Audulus 4 will need an internet connection to verify the subscription status - do I understand correctly that starting Audulus 4 without an internet connection available will block the subscription features?
Seems unlikely. I suggest contacting the dev directly. I am not sure how actively they monitor discussions here.
Essentially, it’s not ransomware. Audulus 4 is more like freeware for use, but a paid service for programming custom modules.
And you can subscribe for a few months, make modifications, or develop new modules, then cancel your subscription and use everything you did for free.
I think that developer don’t have other valuable solution to charge for new features, once they unlock the ability to develop custom modules, it’s almost impossible to sell proprietary IAP ones.
I’m unable to test, but if it is possible to use the free version as AUv3, then Audulus is of great value for everyone.
Implementing that model takes resources and it isn’t yet known how effective the model will be in the long run. It seems like it should be a good model but the data is limited so far.
I think one should be cautious about throwing this model out there without mentioning that developers have to each work a mechanism to implement such a system … and us not having a concrete idea of how much extra work is involved in implementing and maintaining it.
@tja: while it may seem obvious that it is a good model… without actually knowing how much time is required to implement and maintain such a system, one cannot know if implementing it would be cost-effective for any particular developer…especially since we don’t have any real idea how much revenue of these developers are earning. I think we should be cautious in our assumptions.
I know at least one developer who considered that model and determined that it would add more labor than could be justified for their case.
I see one of the premium subs features is multi thread, does it works in stand alone only or it have some effect in AUV3 too?