What’s up with James Webb?

knewspeak

@dendy said:

@knewspeak said:

@richardyot said:

@knewspeak said:

@richardyot said:

@McD said:
There are still mysteries in outer space… and still some in inner space:

Sabine has some thoughts on this;

She also has thoughts about Modified Newtonian Gravity, all debate is welcome but doesn’t mean she is correct.

She would be the first to admit that she might not be correct, because that's exactly how science works. If a theory isn't bourne out by experiment or observation then it's discarded.

True, but science like any orthodoxy often blinds itself when confronted by the obvious.

She literally often goest agains orthodoxy in science :-D I think she even made one video explicitly about this topic (orthodoxy in science). She contradicts many generally accepted theories, i like her takes on simulation hypothesis or regarding multiverses (she is a quite skeptic in both cases).

Based on my (limited) science knowledge, her arguments sounds to me very logic and most inportantly - verifiable. Which is crucial thing with sience, doesn't matter who said something, but if that this is verifiable from other sources.

Btw. watching her channel for years and she really has no problem to admit when she was wrong about something. Big respect to her for this.

Funny fact: Try look to history at one of her first Youtube posts. She was actually making music

I wasn’t critiquing Sabine for being orthodox btw, just a generalisation of the scientific and most fields of knowledge.

But science hopes everything may be dealt with using applied reductionism, from relative arbitrary positions this may be possible but still only resolving a solution within those boundaries.

Ailerom

@richardyot said:
It’s definitely interesting. The problem with the vanilla Big Bang theory is that it doesn’t really address the question of what causes the initial spark, whereas this idea does. Of course you are then faced with the problem that it’s turtles all the way down (or in this case black holes), but every theory on the origins of the universe has the chicken-and-egg problem (including religious ones, because how did the supposed creator come about).

I've been told that's easy. He was always here. A.l.w.a.y.s.!

richardyot

@knewspeak said:

@dendy said:

@knewspeak said:

@richardyot said:

@knewspeak said:

@richardyot said:

@McD said:
There are still mysteries in outer space… and still some in inner space:

Sabine has some thoughts on this;

She also has thoughts about Modified Newtonian Gravity, all debate is welcome but doesn’t mean she is correct.

She would be the first to admit that she might not be correct, because that's exactly how science works. If a theory isn't bourne out by experiment or observation then it's discarded.

True, but science like any orthodoxy often blinds itself when confronted by the obvious.

She literally often goest agains orthodoxy in science :-D I think she even made one video explicitly about this topic (orthodoxy in science). She contradicts many generally accepted theories, i like her takes on simulation hypothesis or regarding multiverses (she is a quite skeptic in both cases).

Based on my (limited) science knowledge, her arguments sounds to me very logic and most inportantly - verifiable. Which is crucial thing with sience, doesn't matter who said something, but if that this is verifiable from other sources.

Btw. watching her channel for years and she really has no problem to admit when she was wrong about something. Big respect to her for this.

Funny fact: Try look to history at one of her first Youtube posts. She was actually making music

I wasn’t critiquing Sabine for being orthodox btw, just a generalisation of the scientific and most fields of knowledge.

But science hopes everything may be dealt with using applied reductionism, from relative arbitrary positions this may be possible but still only resolving a solution within those boundaries.

You should read the link I posted, because it addresses that point precisely:

https://theeggandtherock.com/p/in-which-i-tell-you-about-my-next

knewspeak

@richardyot said:

@knewspeak said:

@dendy said:

@knewspeak said:

@richardyot said:

@knewspeak said:

@richardyot said:

@McD said:
There are still mysteries in outer space… and still some in inner space:

Sabine has some thoughts on this;

She also has thoughts about Modified Newtonian Gravity, all debate is welcome but doesn’t mean she is correct.

She would be the first to admit that she might not be correct, because that's exactly how science works. If a theory isn't bourne out by experiment or observation then it's discarded.

True, but science like any orthodoxy often blinds itself when confronted by the obvious.

She literally often goest agains orthodoxy in science :-D I think she even made one video explicitly about this topic (orthodoxy in science). She contradicts many generally accepted theories, i like her takes on simulation hypothesis or regarding multiverses (she is a quite skeptic in both cases).

Based on my (limited) science knowledge, her arguments sounds to me very logic and most inportantly - verifiable. Which is crucial thing with sience, doesn't matter who said something, but if that this is verifiable from other sources.

Btw. watching her channel for years and she really has no problem to admit when she was wrong about something. Big respect to her for this.

Funny fact: Try look to history at one of her first Youtube posts. She was actually making music

I wasn’t critiquing Sabine for being orthodox btw, just a generalisation of the scientific and most fields of knowledge.

But science hopes everything may be dealt with using applied reductionism, from relative arbitrary positions this may be possible but still only resolving a solution within those boundaries.

You should read the link I posted, because it addresses that point precisely:

https://theeggandtherock.com/p/in-which-i-tell-you-about-my-next

Thanks @richardyot will do.

Just read the first quote, remarkably similar to what I stated, how synchronous.

MrSmileZ

@drez said:

@MrSmileZ said:
Meh, I couldn’t care about any of this… yawn

Yet here you are…in this thread… 😂

Yep, here I am…I even read some of the posts…to which I say…nobody knows, nobody will know soon…so there’s that.

@wim said:

@MrSmileZ said:
Meh, I couldn’t care about any of this… yawn

Sure, in this universe. But what about in the rest of them?

I’m probably chaotic evil in all “universes” I really don’t know, I really don’t ponder it… I’m the smiliest mister smiles of them all.
It’s a rickest rick joke btw.

@HotStrange said:

@MrSmileZ said:
Meh, I couldn’t care about any of this… yawn

Thanks for letting us know 👍🏻

of course, sharing is Karen or somethin.

@knewspeak said:

@HotStrange said:

@MrSmileZ said:
Meh, I couldn’t care about any of this… yawn

Thanks for letting us know 👍🏻

Strangely illogical answer from @MrSmileZ.

What’s illogical about it? What’s stranger than Hot Strange? What if 2+2=tinyorgy? What if, if not if?

@HotStrange said:

@wim said:

@MrSmileZ said:
Meh, I couldn’t care about any of this… yawn

Sure, in this universe. But what about in the rest of them?

I love this as a reply to anything. “I hate you!” “Sure in this universe but in some universe out there you love me”

Oh, I so love you all in this universe, no matter what the other me’s tell you.