Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

LoopMangler - A Multi-Effect Glitch Sequencer by Igor Vasiliev

2»

Comments

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @gusgranite said:
    Umm, where’s the randomizer?

    There are a few different types of randomization options available when u press the Make button. They're detailed in the manual and I covered them in my walkthrough too in a way that I personally think is much clearer than the way they are explained in the manual.

  • robosardinerobosardine

    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

  • gusgranitegusgranite

    @Gavinski said:

    @gusgranite said:
    Umm, where’s the randomizer?

    There are a few different types of randomization options available when u press the Make button. They're detailed in the manual and I covered them in my walkthrough too in a way that I personally think is much clearer than the way they are explained in the manual.

    Thanks but I mean the big one click 🎲 to mangle it all up :smile: That’s cool there’s more granular options though.

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @gusgranite said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @gusgranite said:
    Umm, where’s the randomizer?

    There are a few different types of randomization options available when u press the Make button. They're detailed in the manual and I covered them in my walkthrough too in a way that I personally think is much clearer than the way they are explained in the manual.

    Thanks but I mean the big one click 🎲 to mangle it all up :smile: That’s cool there’s more granular options though.

    The first option in the Make panel does that - I forget the name of that option because the naming conventions are kinda strange, but it's the first in the list

  • gusgranitegusgranite

    @Gavinski said:

    @gusgranite said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @gusgranite said:
    Umm, where’s the randomizer?

    There are a few different types of randomization options available when u press the Make button. They're detailed in the manual and I covered them in my walkthrough too in a way that I personally think is much clearer than the way they are explained in the manual.

    Thanks but I mean the big one click 🎲 to mangle it all up :smile: That’s cool there’s more granular options though.

    The first option in the Make panel does that - I forget the name of that option because the naming conventions are kinda strange, but it's the first in the list

    I wasn’t sure that first option PAT RHTM was it as it lines everything up each time. Will keep playing.

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @gusgranite said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @gusgranite said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @gusgranite said:
    Umm, where’s the randomizer?

    There are a few different types of randomization options available when u press the Make button. They're detailed in the manual and I covered them in my walkthrough too in a way that I personally think is much clearer than the way they are explained in the manual.

    Thanks but I mean the big one click 🎲 to mangle it all up :smile: That’s cool there’s more granular options though.

    The first option in the Make panel does that - I forget the name of that option because the naming conventions are kinda strange, but it's the first in the list

    I wasn’t sure that first option PAT RHTM was it as it lines everything up each time. Will keep playing.

    Oh yeah, the 2nd one will allow them not to be lined up on the beat. If you play around with them and still feel there's an option missing, maybe hit Igor up via email, he might be open to adding other modes.

  • gusgranitegusgranite

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Using as a send effect is definitely the way until it gets the new dry wet feature, yes.

  • robosardinerobosardine

    @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Yep, I know. I consider myself to be as fair as most. I seldom ask for a refund - hardly ever. The whole scenario has put me right off this one though - big time. I shall spend my £14.99 on something else.
    I’m definitely going to take my time in future instead of rushing in like an exited puppy.

  • craftycuratecraftycurate

    @Slush said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @cuscolima said:
    I usually love Igor's apps. BeatCutter is a work of art even if I still don't understand fully how to use it...happy accidents are numerous and no other apps come close to it. But here I really don't understand what is good with LoopMangler. It sounds always the same whatever I try and it doesn't sound good...and there are other apps that can do the same and even better, so...

    No question whatsoever that something like Looperator is a lot more versatile, I would take it over this one without thinking twice.

    But does Looperator take live input as well?

    Yes in Auv3 mode. In standalone mode you can load in a loop.> @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Have you tried out the User effects in Looperator for added tweakability?

  • gusgranitegusgranite

    ****> @craftycurate said:

    @Slush said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @cuscolima said:
    I usually love Igor's apps. BeatCutter is a work of art even if I still don't understand fully how to use it...happy accidents are numerous and no other apps come close to it. But here I really don't understand what is good with LoopMangler. It sounds always the same whatever I try and it doesn't sound good...and there are other apps that can do the same and even better, so...

    No question whatsoever that something like Looperator is a lot more versatile, I would take it over this one without thinking twice.

    But does Looperator take live input as well?

    Yes in Auv3 mode. In standalone mode you can load in a loop.> @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Have you tried out the User effects in Looperator for added tweakability?

    Yes, don’t get me wrong. It’s an amazing app and I love Sugar Bytes. But it always takes me a while to get a sound that’s mine and fits. I get really quick results with LoopMangler. It might just be honeymoon. We’ll see

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @craftycurate said:

    @Slush said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @cuscolima said:
    I usually love Igor's apps. BeatCutter is a work of art even if I still don't understand fully how to use it...happy accidents are numerous and no other apps come close to it. But here I really don't understand what is good with LoopMangler. It sounds always the same whatever I try and it doesn't sound good...and there are other apps that can do the same and even better, so...

    No question whatsoever that something like Looperator is a lot more versatile, I would take it over this one without thinking twice.

    But does Looperator take live input as well?

    Yes in Auv3 mode. In standalone mode you can load in a loop.> @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Have you tried out the User effects in Looperator for added tweakability?

    That’s the kind of thing I was talking about when I said Looperator was hella versatile.

  • robosardinerobosardine

    @craftycurate said:

    @Slush said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @cuscolima said:
    I usually love Igor's apps. BeatCutter is a work of art even if I still don't understand fully how to use it...happy accidents are numerous and no other apps come close to it. But here I really don't understand what is good with LoopMangler. It sounds always the same whatever I try and it doesn't sound good...and there are other apps that can do the same and even better, so...

    No question whatsoever that something like Looperator is a lot more versatile, I would take it over this one without thinking twice.

    But does Looperator take live input as well?

    Yes in Auv3 mode. In standalone mode you can load in a loop.> @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Have you tried out the User effects in Looperator for added tweakability?

    Yes - superb editing options, all on the one page. The only thing that I don’t like about Looperator is that in the AU the steps are fixed at 16 albeit you can make it go at different speeds.

  • craftycuratecraftycurate

    @robosardine said:

    @craftycurate said:

    @Slush said:

    @Gavinski said:

    @cuscolima said:
    I usually love Igor's apps. BeatCutter is a work of art even if I still don't understand fully how to use it...happy accidents are numerous and no other apps come close to it. But here I really don't understand what is good with LoopMangler. It sounds always the same whatever I try and it doesn't sound good...and there are other apps that can do the same and even better, so...

    No question whatsoever that something like Looperator is a lot more versatile, I would take it over this one without thinking twice.

    But does Looperator take live input as well?

    Yes in Auv3 mode. In standalone mode you can load in a loop.> @gusgranite said:

    @robosardine said:
    Had enough, I’m not going to wait indefinitely for a basic function and all the rest of it which essentially nullifies its usefulness. Refund granted.
    Besides as @Gavinski was saying this doesn’t lay a glove on Looperator.

    To be fair it’s only been a few days and the developer said he’s working on it. Maybe it’s because it’s new but I’m actually preferring this over Looperator at the moment. I’m just using it as a send effect in AUM which is really quick to setup. I sometimes find too many of the effects in Looperator have a recognizable sound and need a lot of tweaking.

    Have you tried out the User effects in Looperator for added tweakability?

    Yes - superb editing options, all on the one page. The only thing that I don’t like about Looperator is that in the AU the steps are fixed at 16 albeit you can make it go at different speeds.

    Yes that is definitely a strength of Loop Mangler … longer grid lengths and alternative time signatures.

  • KashiKashi

    Is Looperator free? When I look it up on the App Store, it has the little cloud symbol with a downwards pointing arrow - but I'm pretty sure I've never bought it (?)

  • robosardinerobosardine

    @Kashi said:
    Is Looperator free? When I look it up on the App Store, it has the little cloud symbol with a downwards pointing arrow - but I'm pretty sure I've never bought it (?)

    Im sure the standalone is free (and maybe limited), but the AU you have to pay for. Give the cloud a press - you’ve nothing to lose - if it asks you to confirm a payment then it’s time to focus.

  • KashiKashi

    @robosardine said:

    @Kashi said:
    Is Looperator free? When I look it up on the App Store, it has the little cloud symbol with a downwards pointing arrow - but I'm pretty sure I've never bought it (?)

    Im sure the standalone is free (and maybe limited), but the AU you have to pay for. Give the cloud a press - you’ve nothing to lose - if it asks you to confirm a payment then it’s time to focus.

    Cool. Thanks buddy

  • craftycuratecraftycurate
    edited September 2024

    I’d love Igor’s app to become indispensible as buffer effects are some of my favourites, and Loop Mangler made a great start, but i feel it needs to level up a bit. For me this could include (some of these are previously discussed, and some of which are in the pipeline)

    • buffer effects
    • Perhaps a wider range of effects e.g. bitcrusher/downsampler, chorus/phaser, reverb, wider range of filters
    • more effect parameters
    • Maybe internal modulation
    • Wet/dry
  • GavinskiGavinski

    @craftycurate said:
    I’d love Igor’s app to become indispensible as buffer effects are some of my favourites, and Loop Mangler made a great start, but i feel it needs to level up a bit. For me this could include (some of these are previously discussed, and some of which are in the pipeline)

    • buffer effects
    • Perhaps a wider range of effects e.g. bitcrusher/downsampler, chorus/phaser, reverb, wider range of filters
    • more effect parameters
    • Maybe internal modulation
    • Wet/dry

    All legit suggestions. Without internal modulation, things can get a bit samey and repetitive, for me anyway, no doubt

  • PxlhgPxlhg

    I actually decided to return this one, I have a few buys from his arsenal (have'm all) I never use (ClassicFX, VintageRack, SoundSaw and GlitschScaper) so I don't feel too bad. Doesn't feel good either but I can always re-buy if it grows some.

  • craftycuratecraftycurate

    @Gavinski said:

    @craftycurate said:
    I’d love Igor’s app to become indispensible as buffer effects are some of my favourites, and Loop Mangler made a great start, but i feel it needs to level up a bit. For me this could include (some of these are previously discussed, and some of which are in the pipeline)

    • buffer effects
    • Perhaps a wider range of effects e.g. bitcrusher/downsampler, chorus/phaser, reverb, wider range of filters
    • more effect parameters
    • Maybe internal modulation
    • Wet/dry

    All legit suggestions. Without internal modulation, things can get a bit samey and repetitive, for me anyway, no doubt

    Really wish Effectrix2 was coming to iOS as it has a huge modulation upgrade compared to Effectrix 1.

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @Pxlhg said:
    I actually decided to return this one, I have a few buys from his arsenal (have'm all) I never use (ClassicFX, VintageRack, SoundSaw and GlitschScaper) so I don't feel too bad. Doesn't feel good either but I can always re-buy if it grows some.

    Without Apple or devs giving us an option to demo apps, I don't think anyone should feel bad about asking for a refund for something they don't like. It seems that although Apple could theoretically keep their fee, which would harm the dev financially, in reality this does not happen. Refunds may be annoying for devs, sure, as that's 1 sale less than they thought they had, but lack of demos is annoying and inconvenient for users, and is fundamentally unfair.

  • PxlhgPxlhg

    @Gavinski said:

    @Pxlhg said:
    I actually decided to return this one, I have a few buys from his arsenal (have'm all) I never use (ClassicFX, VintageRack, SoundSaw and GlitschScaper) so I don't feel too bad. Doesn't feel good either but I can always re-buy if it grows some.

    Without Apple or devs giving us an option to demo apps, I don't think anyone should feel bad about asking for a refund for something they don't like. It seems that although Apple could theoretically keep their fee, which would harm the dev financially, in reality this does not happen. Refunds may be annoying for devs, sure, as that's 1 sale less than they thought they had, but lack of demos is annoying and inconvenient for users, and is fundamentally unfair.

    That's a good point, thank you!

  • eylvyeylvy
    edited October 2024

    Version 1.1 released.
    My demo:

  • SimonSimon

    Version 1.1 - 2 Oct 2024

    - Added an envelope to sets the dry/wet level of the effects on each step of the pattern.

- Added an envelope to sets the output level on each step of the pattern.

- Additional modes of the pattern bars generation that exclude some effects.

- For the delay effect added modes to attenuate output.

- Fixed an issue with input EQ options.

- Fixed an issue with the slow effect on a large number of steps.

- Fixed a problem with sound in Ableton on MacOS.

- Fixed a validation issue in Logic Pro on MacOS.

- A few more minor bugs have been fixed.

- The description has been updated.
  • gusgranitegusgranite

    Wicked update 👍

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2025