Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
What order are they listed in? Any other than the groupings?
How do they get put on the list? I'm curious as I don't see the Lewitt Connect 6, which is supposed to have some of the dual device capabilities of the iConnectivity 4c.
I think it is a simple matter of people having submitted their reviews. What is in the database are review's submitted by Loopy Pro users of gear they use.
The intention is for people to be writing up the gear they actually use.
That's what I'm getting at. Where would someone submit a review to get a piece of gear listed that isn't there? Or is it a basically ad-hoc process by the page maintainer?
re: the Lewitt connect my impression (which might be mistaken) is that while it has dual host capabilities, it doesn't have the same sort of flexible audio/midi virtual routing as the iConnectivity devices.
Anyone can log in to the page and submit a review or comment on a review.
Maybe I'm just blind today, but I don't see a place to submit a review for a piece of equipment that isn't listed already.
You should see something like this when logged in:
Thanks, that's what I was missing.
To be fair, here's how the small and rather faint login link looks on Safari on the Mac. I also expected that if I was logged into the forum I'd be logged in there, so I wasn't looking for it.
I'm also not sure what to use for login credentials. I've got a bit confused jumble of old Audiobus forum and wiki sign in, roadmap sign in, LoopyPro sign in which used to work with my user name but now prefers my email address, former Loopy Pro wiki sign in ... I haven't taken the time out to sort through them all.
I also don't see any way someone who didn't have an account can create one.
No biggie. I don't even have any gear to submit. It was just rousing my curiosity how stuff became listed there.
I think it is the roadmap login but I am not sure
I've come up empty with everything I've tried. No matter. I'll look into it further at another time.
@Michael ?
Ah yeah, I haven't put much effort into making that obvious yet because I don't really have good spam management stuff in place yet. If you follow the "Gear" link from within LP itself, it carries with it a token that lets you contribute without a login. Otherwise you can register at /register - but that link isn't anywhere yet.
It should probably use the LPF login system, but it was a quick-and-dirty side project.
Ha! Stop tempting him. Playtime with other things is over. 😂
(seriously though, how many people that would be likely to update anything are going to notice unless they see this discussion?)
Is this a bad time to suggest getting a "like" button for posts? I can imagine this could be difficult. But it would go a long way to improve relations with members. It would improve communications and a sense of belonging.
Plus it would be an excellent way for people to express their like of a track in the Creations section without the need for them to leave a comment.
Yes! I think a lot more people would be giving positive vibes using 'likes' because so often we don't have time to leave comments. 'Liking' is quick and easy, and builds community spirit.
But - who knows what that looks like on the coding side of things.
That's true to be fair. Not sure what Michael must do to implement the likes system.
Likes were tried for a while a long time back. It didn't go well and ended up being dropped. I don't remember why.
If I want likes then I go to Facebook and even then.
They weren't liked. LOL
😂
. > @Simon said:
I'm trying to resist making the comment that a 'hate' button would maybe be better received 🤔😅
You just did. 👎
...lol! 😂 I can't keep a straight face. I'm just jokin around.
There are studies showing that the "likes" on social media increase positive social community:
"We find that experiencing little to no reaction from others does not only elicit negative emotions and stress amongst users, but also induces low levels of self-esteem. In contrast, receiving much positive online feedback, evokes feelings of social connectedness and reduces overall loneliness"
https://arxiv.org/html/2312.11914v1#:~:text=According%20to%20their%20results%2C%20this,the%20craved%20recognition%20%5B13%5D%20.
"findings demonstrate a process linking positive online social feedback and perceived well-being." https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0736585320301829#:~:text=Findings%20also%20suggest%20that%20posting,Andreassen%20&%20Pallesen%2C%202014).. "https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0736585320301829#:~:text=Findings also suggest that posting,Andreassen & Pallesen, 2014).")
Not sure if it has anything to do with the new site but my theme preference (dark) won’t stay on. Seems like I have to change it back way more often than before, though sometimes it loads fine.
Can’t be that. Nothing changed but the name.