Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Cubasis 3.8.2 Now Available

13»

Comments

  • sigma79sigma79
    edited May 4

    @rapidfire said:

    @sigma79 said:

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @ecou said:

    @sigma79 said:
    Im unsure of the term parallel or serial but need to know the following.

    Perhaps you should document yourself on this first

    It says in the picture posted.

    You can change the position of insert or send effects by moving them to a different slot.

    The T junction seems the route that you would expect to split the outputs of tracks ( and tracks insert fx )

    Then the + sign is combining the outputs of sends.

    So a delay send would then pass through a reverb send ( otherwise part of the signal. The delay ) wont have reverb.

    That’s were you are confusing things. A send does not go thru another send

    The first send in Drambo has a send knob to the 2nd send, just like all tracks have a send knob.

    I don’t own Drambo

    Ideally.

    Cubasis does route the sends through sends ( although not a send amount for the send to send ) and if 8. Perhaps less sound control.

    The issue is.

    The manual says they can be re-orderd and perhaps you would want to re-order, if sends goe through sends.

    Drambo and Cubasis are set up differently in this regard.

    Cubasis sends cannot be sent to another aux channel. They do not and cannot go through another send. The output of each send automatically goes to the master stereo channel. Because they are static, baked in channels there is no way to reorder them and in fact it makes no sense to try and reorder them. Think of them as hard wired.

    Drambo has more flexibility in how you route the audio from channel to channel and you can create more aux(fx) channels as needed. It’s a different environment.

    Other DAWs like AEMS, BM3 and Logic Audio (to name but 3) also have the ability to add more aux channels and you can send aux channels to other channels, but they also provide you with the ability to chain a number of fx together in one channel as does Drambo. Cubasis was not designed like this.

    Iv only used Drambo and AUM, so just thought the routing would be a send through a send ( especially as its documented ) you can re-order sends. Obviously makes you think theres an audio reason ( to re-order )

    Will have to see if it might be an issue.

    I use a resonater send, with a reverb in same lane ( so resonater gets reverb )

    Now im also seeing potential in delay and banded distortion apps.

    Would some signal go through reverb ( if made a send ) but then some signal going through distortion not be going through the reverb ?

    Hi @sigma79,
    @LSlowak has now shared the Send Effects issue with his team which means there must be a reason why the Send order can be changed, I am yet to find out🤔
    Mike

    Thanks.

    The order dosent matter.

    The sends cant route, so you can only really use for a reverb.

    Perhaps the worst Debbie downer on ipad yet.

    Does it mean.

    If I want to use a send for another app like a resonator or distortion, I have to use a seperate reverb for every track that I want the send to pass reverb through ?

    Or just forget send type fx ?

  • 1ktone1ktone

    @sigma79 said:

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @ecou said:

    @sigma79 said:
    Im unsure of the term parallel or serial but need to know the following.

    Perhaps you should document yourself on this first

    It says in the picture posted.

    You can change the position of insert or send effects by moving them to a different slot.

    The T junction seems the route that you would expect to split the outputs of tracks ( and tracks insert fx )

    Then the + sign is combining the outputs of sends.

    So a delay send would then pass through a reverb send ( otherwise part of the signal. The delay ) wont have reverb.

    That’s were you are confusing things. A send does not go thru another send

    The first send in Drambo has a send knob to the 2nd send, just like all tracks have a send knob.

    I don’t own Drambo

    Ideally.

    Cubasis does route the sends through sends ( although not a send amount for the send to send ) and if 8. Perhaps less sound control.

    The issue is.

    The manual says they can be re-orderd and perhaps you would want to re-order, if sends goe through sends.

    Drambo and Cubasis are set up differently in this regard.

    Cubasis sends cannot be sent to another aux channel. They do not and cannot go through another send. The output of each send automatically goes to the master stereo channel. Because they are static, baked in channels there is no way to reorder them and in fact it makes no sense to try and reorder them. Think of them as hard wired.

    Drambo has more flexibility in how you route the audio from channel to channel and you can create more aux(fx) channels as needed. It’s a different environment.

    Other DAWs like AEMS, BM3 and Logic Audio (to name but 3) also have the ability to add more aux channels and you can send aux channels to other channels, but they also provide you with the ability to chain a number of fx together in one channel as does Drambo. Cubasis was not designed like this.

    Iv only used Drambo and AUM, so just thought the routing would be a send through a send ( especially as its documented ) you can re-order sends. Obviously makes you think theres an audio reason ( to re-order )

    Will have to see if it might be an issue.

    I use a resonater send, with a reverb in same lane ( so resonater gets reverb )

    Now im also seeing potential in delay and banded distortion apps.

    Would some signal go through reverb ( if made a send ) but then some signal going through distortion not be going through the reverb ?

    one way to get around it is if you have the part already recorded you could duplicate it and create the fx chain on the inserts of the duplicate part. If it’s a MIDI / instrument channel you could duplicate this and do the same thing. If you want to effect a number of channels at once you could create a mixdown of the desired channels and import this onto an audio channel and create your desired chain of effects on this channel.

    Just some ideas….

  • rapidfirerapidfire

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @sigma79 said:

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @ecou said:

    @sigma79 said:
    Im unsure of the term parallel or serial but need to know the following.

    Perhaps you should document yourself on this first

    It says in the picture posted.

    You can change the position of insert or send effects by moving them to a different slot.

    The T junction seems the route that you would expect to split the outputs of tracks ( and tracks insert fx )

    Then the + sign is combining the outputs of sends.

    So a delay send would then pass through a reverb send ( otherwise part of the signal. The delay ) wont have reverb.

    That’s were you are confusing things. A send does not go thru another send

    The first send in Drambo has a send knob to the 2nd send, just like all tracks have a send knob.

    I don’t own Drambo

    Ideally.

    Cubasis does route the sends through sends ( although not a send amount for the send to send ) and if 8. Perhaps less sound control.

    The issue is.

    The manual says they can be re-orderd and perhaps you would want to re-order, if sends goe through sends.

    Drambo and Cubasis are set up differently in this regard.

    Cubasis sends cannot be sent to another aux channel. They do not and cannot go through another send. The output of each send automatically goes to the master stereo channel. Because they are static, baked in channels there is no way to reorder them and in fact it makes no sense to try and reorder them. Think of them as hard wired.

    Drambo has more flexibility in how you route the audio from channel to channel and you can create more aux(fx) channels as needed. It’s a different environment.

    Other DAWs like AEMS, BM3 and Logic Audio (to name but 3) also have the ability to add more aux channels and you can send aux channels to other channels, but they also provide you with the ability to chain a number of fx together in one channel as does Drambo. Cubasis was not designed like this.

    Iv only used Drambo and AUM, so just thought the routing would be a send through a send ( especially as its documented ) you can re-order sends. Obviously makes you think theres an audio reason ( to re-order )

    Will have to see if it might be an issue.

    I use a resonater send, with a reverb in same lane ( so resonater gets reverb )

    Now im also seeing potential in delay and banded distortion apps.

    Would some signal go through reverb ( if made a send ) but then some signal going through distortion not be going through the reverb ?

    one way to get around it is if you have the part already recorded you could duplicate it and create the fx chain on the inserts of the duplicate part. If it’s a MIDI / instrument channel you could duplicate this and do the same thing. If you want to effect a number of channels at once you could create a mixdown of the desired channels and import this onto an audio channel and create your desired chain of effects on this channel.

    Just some ideas….

    Wow, it’s really getting complicated now 😵‍💫
    Mike

  • sigma79sigma79

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @sigma79 said:

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @ecou said:

    @sigma79 said:
    Im unsure of the term parallel or serial but need to know the following.

    Perhaps you should document yourself on this first

    It says in the picture posted.

    You can change the position of insert or send effects by moving them to a different slot.

    The T junction seems the route that you would expect to split the outputs of tracks ( and tracks insert fx )

    Then the + sign is combining the outputs of sends.

    So a delay send would then pass through a reverb send ( otherwise part of the signal. The delay ) wont have reverb.

    That’s were you are confusing things. A send does not go thru another send

    The first send in Drambo has a send knob to the 2nd send, just like all tracks have a send knob.

    I don’t own Drambo

    Ideally.

    Cubasis does route the sends through sends ( although not a send amount for the send to send ) and if 8. Perhaps less sound control.

    The issue is.

    The manual says they can be re-orderd and perhaps you would want to re-order, if sends goe through sends.

    Drambo and Cubasis are set up differently in this regard.

    Cubasis sends cannot be sent to another aux channel. They do not and cannot go through another send. The output of each send automatically goes to the master stereo channel. Because they are static, baked in channels there is no way to reorder them and in fact it makes no sense to try and reorder them. Think of them as hard wired.

    Drambo has more flexibility in how you route the audio from channel to channel and you can create more aux(fx) channels as needed. It’s a different environment.

    Other DAWs like AEMS, BM3 and Logic Audio (to name but 3) also have the ability to add more aux channels and you can send aux channels to other channels, but they also provide you with the ability to chain a number of fx together in one channel as does Drambo. Cubasis was not designed like this.

    Iv only used Drambo and AUM, so just thought the routing would be a send through a send ( especially as its documented ) you can re-order sends. Obviously makes you think theres an audio reason ( to re-order )

    Will have to see if it might be an issue.

    I use a resonater send, with a reverb in same lane ( so resonater gets reverb )

    Now im also seeing potential in delay and banded distortion apps.

    Would some signal go through reverb ( if made a send ) but then some signal going through distortion not be going through the reverb ?

    one way to get around it is if you have the part already recorded you could duplicate it and create the fx chain on the inserts of the duplicate part. If it’s a MIDI / instrument channel you could duplicate this and do the same thing. If you want to effect a number of channels at once you could create a mixdown of the desired channels and import this onto an audio channel and create your desired chain of effects on this channel.

    Just some ideas….

    Thanks.

    Im just routing Drambo from another ipad because I can use micii learn on synths.

    Didnt expect 8 sends not passing audio through each send.

  • sigma79sigma79

    I may as well just make a screen recording.

  • sigma79sigma79

    lol.

  • sigma79sigma79

    Its the best option though.

  • 1ktone1ktone
    edited May 4

    @sigma79 said:
    Its the best option though.

    If you need a timeline based DAW have a look at Audio Evolution Mobile Studio. Free to download and relatively inexpensive ($10 AUD) to get the expanded aux options.

  • sigma79sigma79
    edited May 5

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @sigma79 said:
    Its the best option though.

    If you need a timeline based DAW have a look at Audio Evolution Mobile Studio. Free to download and relatively inexpensive ($10 AUD) to get the expanded aux options.

    I tried AEM today.

    Need Abelton link for my other pattern ipads to work with a timeline DAW.

    Im able to keep a send function in cubasis for a particular send, which is a Drambo resonator and a Drambo reverb in the same send track, thats on my Drambo drum ipad.

    If I stem these tracks in Cubasis and redo the send for recording. I can just use a Drambo mfx, with the resonator and a reverb next to resonator.

    This will work as a cubasis resonator send ( with reverb )

    Other sends wont work but not bothered about delay sends or a banded distortion send.

    Cubasis sends are just for reverbs ( or perhaps a few to choose from ) although the resonator send will work.

    Thanks.

  • sigma79sigma79

    A Rambo drum ipad ( to a Cubasis track )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars ( transfer stems at end of project or not )

    A rambo synth ipad ( with midi ) and multioutputs ( to cubasis tracks )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars.

    Cubasis becomes building block for audio tracks and automated fx.

  • 1ktone1ktone

    @sigma79 said:
    A Rambo drum ipad ( to a Cubasis track )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars ( transfer stems at end of project or not )

    A rambo synth ipad ( with midi ) and multioutputs ( to cubasis tracks )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars.

    Cubasis becomes building block for audio tracks and automated fx.

    I’ve been enjoying using Drambo as an effect recently as well. This could give you a bit more of an fx chain in your effect send.
    I used IK Multimedia’s Mixbox for this kind of stuff as well. Haven’t done so as much of late. But, I think it’s just experimenting with stuff until you work something out that’s right for you.

  • ecouecou

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @sigma79 said:
    A Rambo drum ipad ( to a Cubasis track )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars ( transfer stems at end of project or not )

    A rambo synth ipad ( with midi ) and multioutputs ( to cubasis tracks )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars.

    Cubasis becomes building block for audio tracks and automated fx.

    I’ve been enjoying using Drambo as an effect recently as well. This could give you a bit more of an fx chain in your effect send.
    I used IK Multimedia’s Mixbox for this kind of stuff as well. Haven’t done so as much of late. But, I think it’s just experimenting with stuff until you work something out that’s right for you.

    Baby audio transit is a good one too.

  • sigma79sigma79

    @ecou said:

    @Mountain_Hamlet said:

    @sigma79 said:
    A Rambo drum ipad ( to a Cubasis track )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars ( transfer stems at end of project or not )

    A rambo synth ipad ( with midi ) and multioutputs ( to cubasis tracks )

    Patterns fit with cubasis looper and bars.

    Cubasis becomes building block for audio tracks and automated fx.

    I’ve been enjoying using Drambo as an effect recently as well. This could give you a bit more of an fx chain in your effect send.
    I used IK Multimedia’s Mixbox for this kind of stuff as well. Haven’t done so as much of late. But, I think it’s just experimenting with stuff until you work something out that’s right for you.

    Baby audio transit is a good one too.

    4 pockets has released Retrolab.

Sign In or Register to comment.