Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
OK. Brain freeze/fade. How do I choose/change instrument sounds themselves in Moodscaper?
Do you mean the button next to the play button? Solid torus, outline torus, Saturn, Smile, Frown
No. I think those are the respective 'moods', not the sounds themselves.
>
And AudioBus.
It's becoming a bit of a joke that AB support is apparently so much less important than other updates.
I haven't had a proper play with this yet, but I was wondering that too.
imagine if audiobus wasn't here and these apps had no crutch to lean on, audiobus is a problem solver. I hate that we need it as the AB geniuses could be working on other stuff, but thank god we have it. Still would be nice if devs understood the iPad or any i device is a one screen touch screen device that needs each app to be as self fulfilling of an app on it's own before audiobus and audioshare swoop in to save the day, imho
You don't seem to grasp that this app doesn't need Audiobus. For sure, it would be useful, but it does what it intends to do (as is) very well.
Focus on what an instrument does, and not what it doesn’t do, and you may discover it’s more useful to you than you thought. Or just go to another app you like better.
AB implementation might take more time to learn and do than the developer can manage so far. Maybe bitching about it more will help.
I disagree. An instrument can be anything to the individual, creativity runs deep in a way that only the person in question can really understand for themselves, Audiobus could be something that just changes the world for that person and there is nothing wrong with that. What I don't like and I'm not talking about this dev in particular is when people design for the iPad as if an iPad has the nature of a laptop. It's just a one screen animal and it would be nice if devs kept the iPads own nature in mind when developing, like the ikaossilator for example. I'm not saying everything should be like the ikaosillator either just that korg wasn't going against the devices nature when designing it and I guess that shouldn't be a surprise since the kaosspads were really a precursor to the iPad.
I personally just wish devs would think about making convenience the start, middle, and end of the design process a lil mo tiny bitty bits cause right now the trend is heading in the other direction and I thought iOS was about getting away from all of that.
+1
It sounds amazing, does everything it says on the tin, doesn't crash, has an active dev and supports IAA.
For £2.99 it puts some apps costing five times the price or more to shame.
Once you have loaded them via iTunes - tapping the instrument button will scroll through the instruments iirc ...
Page 12 onwards
http://media.wix.com/ugd/438c76_5dae9bb5ab6d41b18af54ee8472a2776.pdf
J
+1 agreed. I use it in AUM or record a background soundscape in AudioShare to use elsewhere. Works great. I think the devs efforts would be better spent getting easy sample import implemented and possibly midi out.
Thanks. I must be having a problem with the import feature. I downloaded the sound sets (750MB?) from the moodscape site and replaces the 'sounds' folder etc as described in the manual, but when clicking through the 'instruments' I only seem to get seven or eight choices, all strings/washes.....perhaps I will have another go at it. If @moodscaper has any advice on my likely error it would be gratefully received...
Also, for those of you who've got this working, ie. your own samples playing in Moodscaper via iTunes filesharing... how does that work out? I think the dev's native sounds all compliment each other very well and you can't really get a bad soundscape going at all. I imagine once I start importing my own stuff willy-nilly, it's likely gonna get ugly pretty fast.
How has it worked out for those who've played with using their own samples instead of the native sounds?
I haven't tried yet - I hate iTunes so I'm waiting for a better sample import update.
Didn't our old pal Nathan used to hound this dev about AB too? Looks like you joined about the same time Nathan bailed. And, you reference Kate Bush just like Nathan used to also...
Hmmm... Nathan? You've been reincarnated! lol
There's a lot of regeneration and cloning on here. Wouldn't surprise me if everyone on this forum was really me, and I've spent the last year or two chatting to myself...
@kobamoto i disagree. Every app SHOULD be like Ikaossilator
You're Nathan too? Does that mean I am as well? lol
Could be wrong, but if I'm not... I think it's kind of interesting how you can often spot or recognize an online personality when they either have multiple accounts or resurface anew.
And, I think it's interesting that on the rare occasion I actually meet an online acquaintance offline in person, they're often nothing like I'd imagined them to be online. Not physical appearance so much, but just the personality. I don't tend to form a visual of online personas, I just attach whatever avatar they're using as their visual representation.
I wonder if blind users assign a visual appearance to online acquaintances, even if it's an abstract representation?
Make you wonder which version of the self is more authentic... the online version within the veil of partial anonymity? Or, the version you pres not face to face?
Hmmm. Watched Westworld last night and it led me to bad dreams and, as ever, back to Bostrom's simulation thing. I think you might be right that all of this is largely you. Maybe this is some parallel universe experiment. We are all Monzos who took different turns at points along the way. The upside is I get to blame you for much of the sadness in my life and it will certainly give the therapist stuff to work with (if I ever get round to buying one).
The length and passion of this thread is surprising to me. It's an attractive app, but it seems completely like cheating to me! I mean, intellectually, I'm well on-board with Eno's concept of generative music — largely because Eno is the author of the parameters. I personally feel a little guilty with the complete ease that I can make something usable in Xynthesizer. Can you actually create in this Moodscaper?
I think I must have misjudged.
People tend to repeat themselves on forums and when they are trolling they still do so, it's not hard to see patterns.
Join the queue, just behind Mrs Monzo
I'd been thinking of the simulation argument a lot too lately. Even before Westworld... but it reminds me of a somewhat amusing exchange I had the other day with some Jehovah's Witnesses. I don't have problem with that religion or any religion for that matter... I try to keep an open mind because I know that I honestly don't have a clue.
Anyway, I was running short on time and I asked them if they aren't trying to recruit souls for brownie points so that they're favored or chosen by God, and that they just had some good news they wanted to share with me.
I asked, "Well, what's the real endgame here then? What's the goal? Isn't most of this concern about whatever happens when our bodies die?" They said yes. "Well then, what is it exactly that you think is going to happen to you? Let's say that a delivery truck loses control, plows into you as you're leaving, accidentally runs you over and drags you down the street... leaving you in a big heap of raw hamburger meat. What's going to happen then?
They said, "Well, when Jesus comes back and sets up a new government on Earth, I'll be resurrected."
I replied, "What do you mean by that exactly 'resurrected'?"
They said, "I'll come back and be just like I am now. Same clothes, same appearance, same memories."
I replied, "Nope. I really don't think that's going to happen. You may come back in some form, but I doubt it'll be a reconstitution of exactly the way you are today."
Then, I thought of the theory that we're all likely living in a complex simulated virtual reality created by some "post humans" and I said to the Jehovah's Witnesses, "Wait a minute! Eureka! I think I have a way that your belief system could work. Let's say that simulated virtual reality thing is real and we're creations within that simulation right now. If you did indeed get smashed and squished into hamburger meat, it's completely plausible that our post human creator/intelligent/designer/programmer of this simulation... could reconstitute you back to exactly the way your code is expressed right now.. down to the cloths and what you perceive to be memories, etc. So yeah, I guess it's plausible."
They both looked a bit baffled, like they were trying to come up with a scriptural way they could refute that idea... then another older fellow came up and motioned for them to leave. I've never seen them take off so quickly.
I wonder if my name will get scratched off their regular visiting list now?
i submit to your wisdom
If God needed salesmen...
Back to the simulation hypothesis, something that makes me give it more serious consideration is the relatively recent discovery that contrary to slowing down as it expands, the universe is speeding up. Thus invalidating physics as we think we know it. Unless we're living in the Matrix, then the rules can be rewritten.
>
Coincidences are everywhere. I wouldn't read too much into them if I were you.
But then, you seem to have joined around the same time as the character you mention. Perhaps you are he, as you are me and we are all together. Goo goo ga joob.
Hi... the other sounds are accessed by gently tapping the different button/pads... check the other screen which has the effects controls...
I didn't count them all, but there were a lot!
It'd be cool to get some feedback or idea as to what sound was playing on the pad/button!
I hope this helps
Jason