Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
>
Yes, I can do it in a number of PC or Mac programs, and as you kindly checked, the Adobe Mix app. Okay for now, but would hope that doing this kind of thing in-app appears in a future update.
@u0421793 said:
typographic features, not there yet and hopefully coming. (we should let them know) fading titles is really easy, either just dropping a fade on them from the transition effects, or key framing manually in the frame&fit tab
by the way, your optimism to find a more pro video editing app than this on iPad made me smile
Any chance of adding features similar to Vidibox? This was such a great concept, but ended up being abandonware. I would happily buy such features as an IAP for Lumafusion.
https://appsto.re/gb/qR-vM.i
Just a thought, but you could just ask them directly and let them know how the app could be more useful to you. They're very responsive and open minded, but I think their main target user are tools for video bloggers and mobile journalists. Or, anyone who makes money from video editing.
The app is in it's infancy, but they have a nice roadmap for things to come.
Couldn't hurt to ask them though: http://forums.luma-touch.com/
vidibox is a very cool app, but I'd much prefer the vidibox guys updating their app than those features in lumafusion. it's just two very different things, clip launching vs timeline ... but what lumafusion needs is masking features and a few obvious things like voice overs
can you change adjust the opacity of each video layer. so that you could lower the opacity of a top channel, and see the channel playing below it?
Yes. +1. I you look at their stated roadmap.. there are some very impressive features coming. I think masking features and voice overs are closer to the top of their list.
yes that is possible
It is nice that they published their road map and their plans. I only hope they succeed with this app and have enough resources and energy to complete everything on their list.
Yeah, me too. I know they sounded like they wanted to go with more of a subscription model for sustainability, but most balked (including myself). Instead, they went with a slightly higher-priced app that I hope keeps them in the black long enough to get some of these new features added.
I think they'll succeed because of the experience they've had with Pinnacle Studio Pro, and LumaFX. And as far was bread and butter video editing on iOS with layered FX included, etc. I don't think they have a rival.
That could change obviously, so I hope the things on their roadmap go live sooner rather than later.
really, awesome! where is that setting?
I think it was smart of them to not do the subscription thing (and smart of you to convince them about it). I think once masking is there, it is rightly priced at around 40 € and if they add some feature for free and some pro features as IAP, that oculd really work for them and customers.
in the frame&fit tab, there is also an opacity slider
thanks man
Double Tap a clip on the time line to get there
Doesn't need to be subscription based - this will appeal to a bigger audience than a synth app, so if it's the best video app on the market (and seems it's getting there) then they've nailed it.
**I've asked you privately to give up this frankly creepy nonsense with reference to my ID. Now you've tried this in public, and I just don't understand why you feel the need to keep this virtual stalking idiocy up.
First you e-mail me telling me how I should help Doug, and now persist with this irritating bollocks. Why are you obsessed with me? What the fuck has it got to do with you who I am? Is your life really so limited and sad that you must irritate someone on the other side of the world.**
I am reporting this, and asking one last time STOP.
Nathan was kind of a polarizing fellow here in the forum, @Nkersov. Perhaps that's why @skiphunt is trying to poke fun at you with this. But if you find this offensive, he definitely should stop. Please, let's not make this a long exchange of blows.
>
Yes. The mix up seems to be based on myself and Nathan having two things in common.
A bit of fun is no problem, everyone here knows I have a sense of humour. But seriously, @skiphunt has been asked to let this go, and still persists.
'
@Nkersov I know nothing about any previous interactions between the two of you, and you've only ever been unpleasantly aggressive towards me on this forum.
Having said that, the use of those two nicknames looked to me like an oddly unfavourable personal remark entirely unrelated to the rest of the post/discussion, and its presence there seemed off to me.
Your unpleasant agression towards me so far has only ever been perfectly straightforward, which I appreciate. I'm really crap at subtext, in general, and dislike it. I prefer disputes to be out in the open where they can be resolved easily, or at least steered around.
Just thought you might appreciate knowing that the creepiness you spotted wasn't your imagination.
My 2p.
Yeah, reads to me like more of the same. Only more so.
@Nkersov Hey sorry for that, buddy. I'll edit my post since you didn't appreciate the humor. You seem like a decent fellow and I don't have anything against you at all. Will edit now. And I hope you enjoy your new software, and I also hope that it evolves to be all you'd hoped it'd be.
From your postings, I think we have much in common. I too am a recent fan of Fab Filters and a longtime fan of Kate Bush's work. Maybe we can have a chat over the phone some time. That'd be cool. Peace brother
@Nkersov I'd be happy to contact you privately about what happened to me when this dude contacted me by phone, if you'd be interested?
Lol, this is getting dangerous. I smell a closed thread all the way from the south hemisphere.
I think a few people haven't had anywhere near enough booze.
There's a few things in lubamfusuyon that I could do with just this minute (if it isn't too much trouble to the manufacturers, to bang out a quick update, half an hour should be fine, I'll make another cup of tea in the meantime?).
1: numerical readout of where I'm moving something, and how big I've scaled it to.
2: grid lines (and snap to) to indicate safe area or for composition, etc. (or movable snap guides, but that'll take an extra ten minutes longer to manufacture, no doubt).
Just those two things would let me breeze past a stoppage I'm facing now. I'm trying to line stuff up, and I'm trying to match the scaling sizes and positions of key-framed clips as they meet in the cut.
.
I'd agree with both of these... especially the snap-to. I think it does slightly but I don't think it's robust enough.
If you folks really want to wash your dirty laundry in public, we could always create a "Laundry" thread and leave this one alone.