Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

BeatMaker 3 July 15th.

1…4546485051…77

Comments

  • RUST( i )KRUST( i )K

    @Littlewoodg said:
    Frustrated? Sometimes it helps to talk it out https://dood.al/pinktrombone/

    Lets.

    What up USA iTunes?

    How much is it anyway?

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    Tomorrow Garageband will be updated with all the features of BM3 but still not external midi support for any of them. :kiss:

  • philowerxphilowerx

    @RustiK said:

    @Littlewoodg said:
    Frustrated? Sometimes it helps to talk it out https://dood.al/pinktrombone/

    Lets.

    What up USA iTunes?

    How much is it anyway?

    Intro price is $19.98 for 7 days.

  • Gaia.TreeGaia.Tree

    I walked down the street to my sister in laws house to sit in her back porch and wifi. Now would be an optimal time, BM3

  • DatGoodDatGood

    Watching you lot on this forum is hilarious.

  • ZenLizardZenLizard

    Siri wants to know what a "Meat Raker Tree" is.

  • DefRobotDefRobot

    I trust that we will get it at the UK equivalent of $19.99?

    :) :D :# :o :/ :( :'(

  • AphexAphex

    @ZenLizard said:
    Siri wants to know what a "Meat Raker Tree" is.

    Lol!!!

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @5pinlink said:

    @philowerx said:

    @RustiK said:

    @Littlewoodg said:
    Frustrated? Sometimes it helps to talk it out https://dood.al/pinktrombone/

    Lets.

    What up USA iTunes?

    How much is it anyway?

    Intro price is $19.98 for 7 days.

    Why hasn't anybody mentioned the conspiracy to release 7 days late to bypass the sale and charge us full price hahahahaha (Thought i would throw it out, before somebody actually said it seriously hah)

    I expect Retronyms buying Intua and bury all the BM3 cartridges at Alamogordo desert...

  • anicktanickt

    @brambos said:

    @DefRobot said:
    This can definitely be used as a fully functioning DAW as far as I can see, with full audio tracks, auxiliaries and plug ins. Or am I missing something?
    I could certainly see myself fully creating songs within it. Unless I AM missing something....

    Ofcourse you can. In the 90s and 2000s we were producing full tracks with much less fancy tools.

    Or the 80's with 4 tracks on cassette and a sampler with 128k RAM the total cost of which was close to $3k.

  • brambosbrambos

    @anickt said:

    Ofcourse you can. In the 90s and 2000s we were producing full tracks with much less fancy tools.

    Or the 80's with 4 tracks on cassette and a sampler with 128k RAM the total cost of which was close to $3k.

    Actually, it sounds like a really fun challenge the make a track with just 128k worth of samples. That's the sort of stuff I love doing. Extreme limitations for the win :D

  • anicktanickt

    @5pinlink said:

    @anickt said:

    @brambos said:

    @DefRobot said:
    This can definitely be used as a fully functioning DAW as far as I can see, with full audio tracks, auxiliaries and plug ins. Or am I missing something?
    I could certainly see myself fully creating songs within it. Unless I AM missing something....

    Ofcourse you can. In the 90s and 2000s we were producing full tracks with much less fancy tools.

    Or the 80's with 4 tracks on cassette and a sampler with 128k RAM the total cost of which was close to $3k.

    I was so lucky in 89, I come from a piss poor family that couldn't afford anything, a geezer down the road gave e his s612 and qDisk because i was the only person who could actually get it to do anything hahaha, the deal was, i would go along to his bands recordings, use it to trigger a few car sounds and other crap (It was the 80s, these rock gimps back then thought that was the rebirth of music) and i could keep it at home to get all the sounds prepped.
    I made a ton of HipHop on that and a 4 track reel to reel the 87 year old fella next door give me, i was like a pig in shit hahaha

    I wanted a 612 so bad. Ended up getting a Mirage and learning hex to trim samples. LOL

  • IcepulseIcepulse

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @LeeB said:
    I'm a synth man, so probably won't be buying it right away, but have been dipping in and out of the 47 pages of comments.

    Mainly for the tantrums. Gotta laugh!

    A sampler is a synth, just see my vid above (yeah i made it hastily to show a point to Samu and the developers here, but still, shows how to synthesize a drawbar organ quickly.

    A great tip for synth heads using a sampler is this
    1 Convert any old crap, a Tesco advert/a radio DJ talking shite/any old crap to 24/96
    2 Load it into a sample editor and create a loop of 734 samples in size
    3 Move that crap around willy nilly and save out some of the 734 sample selections
    4 You now have a folder full of 'C' key, single cycle waveforms that will sound really cool hahaha

    Yeah you get some aliasing with single cycle waveforms not grabbed in to a wavetable synth, but lets be honest, with the anaemic quality of a lot of super clean synths who cares nowadays, a bit of dirt goes along way, some developers are even Making money for creating effects that put that rubbish back on to the mix.

    Sorry, no.

    No what ?

    A sampler is no synth. Some synths can use samples but it´s not the same.
    But i know what you mean and of course you can get some awesome results too.
    I mean i like synthesis and creative sampling.
    But i hope some day synthesis can replace samples anyway.

    A synth manipulates a waveform w/ envelopes, filters, LFO's, oscillators, etc. whether that waveform is an electrically generated tone, or a sampled one, is largely irrelevant.

  • BartlinuxBartlinux

    @mathieugarcia somehow, you get ridiculous and no comment Read more

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @Icepulse said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @LeeB said:
    I'm a synth man, so probably won't be buying it right away, but have been dipping in and out of the 47 pages of comments.

    Mainly for the tantrums. Gotta laugh!

    A sampler is a synth, just see my vid above (yeah i made it hastily to show a point to Samu and the developers here, but still, shows how to synthesize a drawbar organ quickly.

    A great tip for synth heads using a sampler is this
    1 Convert any old crap, a Tesco advert/a radio DJ talking shite/any old crap to 24/96
    2 Load it into a sample editor and create a loop of 734 samples in size
    3 Move that crap around willy nilly and save out some of the 734 sample selections
    4 You now have a folder full of 'C' key, single cycle waveforms that will sound really cool hahaha

    Yeah you get some aliasing with single cycle waveforms not grabbed in to a wavetable synth, but lets be honest, with the anaemic quality of a lot of super clean synths who cares nowadays, a bit of dirt goes along way, some developers are even Making money for creating effects that put that rubbish back on to the mix.

    Sorry, no.

    No what ?

    A sampler is no synth. Some synths can use samples but it´s not the same.
    But i know what you mean and of course you can get some awesome results too.
    I mean i like synthesis and creative sampling.
    But i hope some day synthesis can replace samples anyway.

    A synth manipulates a waveform w/ envelopes, filters, LFO's, oscillators, etc. whether that waveform is an electrically generated tone, or a sampled one, is largely irrelevant.

    No.

  • IcepulseIcepulse

    @Cib said:

    @Icepulse said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @LeeB said:
    I'm a synth man, so probably won't be buying it right away, but have been dipping in and out of the 47 pages of comments.

    Mainly for the tantrums. Gotta laugh!

    A sampler is a synth, just see my vid above (yeah i made it hastily to show a point to Samu and the developers here, but still, shows how to synthesize a drawbar organ quickly.

    A great tip for synth heads using a sampler is this
    1 Convert any old crap, a Tesco advert/a radio DJ talking shite/any old crap to 24/96
    2 Load it into a sample editor and create a loop of 734 samples in size
    3 Move that crap around willy nilly and save out some of the 734 sample selections
    4 You now have a folder full of 'C' key, single cycle waveforms that will sound really cool hahaha

    Yeah you get some aliasing with single cycle waveforms not grabbed in to a wavetable synth, but lets be honest, with the anaemic quality of a lot of super clean synths who cares nowadays, a bit of dirt goes along way, some developers are even Making money for creating effects that put that rubbish back on to the mix.

    Sorry, no.

    No what ?

    A sampler is no synth. Some synths can use samples but it´s not the same.
    But i know what you mean and of course you can get some awesome results too.
    I mean i like synthesis and creative sampling.
    But i hope some day synthesis can replace samples anyway.

    A synth manipulates a waveform w/ envelopes, filters, LFO's, oscillators, etc. whether that waveform is an electrically generated tone, or a sampled one, is largely irrelevant.

    No.

    What is the base tone in a synth? What is the first link in the chain on a synth?

  • SamuSamu

    @Cib said:

    @Icepulse said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @Cib said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @LeeB said:
    I'm a synth man, so probably won't be buying it right away, but have been dipping in and out of the 47 pages of comments.

    Mainly for the tantrums. Gotta laugh!

    A sampler is a synth, just see my vid above (yeah i made it hastily to show a point to Samu and the developers here, but still, shows how to synthesize a drawbar organ quickly.

    A great tip for synth heads using a sampler is this
    1 Convert any old crap, a Tesco advert/a radio DJ talking shite/any old crap to 24/96
    2 Load it into a sample editor and create a loop of 734 samples in size
    3 Move that crap around willy nilly and save out some of the 734 sample selections
    4 You now have a folder full of 'C' key, single cycle waveforms that will sound really cool hahaha

    Yeah you get some aliasing with single cycle waveforms not grabbed in to a wavetable synth, but lets be honest, with the anaemic quality of a lot of super clean synths who cares nowadays, a bit of dirt goes along way, some developers are even Making money for creating effects that put that rubbish back on to the mix.

    Sorry, no.

    No what ?

    A sampler is no synth. Some synths can use samples but it´s not the same.
    But i know what you mean and of course you can get some awesome results too.
    I mean i like synthesis and creative sampling.
    But i hope some day synthesis can replace samples anyway.

    A synth manipulates a waveform w/ envelopes, filters, LFO's, oscillators, etc. whether that waveform is an electrically generated tone, or a sampled one, is largely irrelevant.

    No.

    So the stuff Wolfgang Palm (WaveGenerator, WaveMapper and Phonem) do not qualify as a synths or what?!?
    Technically they are using 'samples' as wave-tables or calculating the wave-form...

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    I'm talking f.e. about OSC's which generate waveforms or whatever in realtime instead of cycle trough a sample and stretch them.
    If you believe me or not.....it's not the same.

  • BkraftyBkrafty

    Siri said :"OK, playing Paula Abdul "Straight Up"

  • marcuspresidentmarcuspresident

    @5pinlink said:

    @anickt said:

    @5pinlink said:

    @anickt said:

    @brambos said:

    @DefRobot said:
    This can definitely be used as a fully functioning DAW as far as I can see, with full audio tracks, auxiliaries and plug ins. Or am I missing something?
    I could certainly see myself fully creating songs within it. Unless I AM missing something....

    Ofcourse you can. In the 90s and 2000s we were producing full tracks with much less fancy tools.

    Or the 80's with 4 tracks on cassette and a sampler with 128k RAM the total cost of which was close to $3k.

    I was so lucky in 89, I come from a piss poor family that couldn't afford anything, a geezer down the road gave e his s612 and qDisk because i was the only person who could actually get it to do anything hahaha, the deal was, i would go along to his bands recordings, use it to trigger a few car sounds and other crap (It was the 80s, these rock gimps back then thought that was the rebirth of music) and i could keep it at home to get all the sounds prepped.
    I made a ton of HipHop on that and a 4 track reel to reel the 87 year old fella next door give me, i was like a pig in shit hahaha

    I wanted a 612 so bad. Ended up getting a Mirage and learning hex to trim samples. LOL

    I have owned most hardware samplers, and yet the s612 is still my most vivid memory of any sampler, it had a weird slightly off shape figure 8 power connector, and once you lost the lead (They had) it was near impossible to get one off Akai in the UK, so i had a normal figure 8 jammed in there with all my might, at least once a week it gave me a damn good pisser across the room, that is my main memory of that sampler haha

    Hahaha!

  • IcepulseIcepulse
    edited July 2017

    @Cib said:
    I'm talking f.e. about OSC's which generate waveforms or whatever in realtime instead of cycle trough a sample and stretch them.
    If you believe me or not.....it's not the same.

    You're right. A synth capable of working with samples is far more interesting and flexible.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @Icepulse said:

    @Cib said:
    I'm talking f.e. about OSC's which generate waveforms or whatever in realtime instead of cycle trough a sample and stretch them.
    If you believe me or not.....it's not the same.

    You're right. A synth capable of working with samples is far more interesting and flexible.

    No ;)

  • SamuSamu

    @Cib said:
    I'm talking f.e. about OSC's which generate waveforms or whatever in realtime instead of cycle trough a sample and stretch them.
    If you believe me or not.....it's not the same.

    With that 'definition' no iOS app is a 'synth' since everything is a sample before it reaches your ears...

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]

    @Samu said:

    @Cib said:
    I'm talking f.e. about OSC's which generate waveforms or whatever in realtime instead of cycle trough a sample and stretch them.
    If you believe me or not.....it's not the same.

    With that 'definition' no iOS app is a 'synth' since everything is a sample before it reaches your ears...

    No.

  • DrippyFaucetDrippyFaucet

    It's here!!

  • LucidMusicIncLucidMusicInc

    @DrippyFaucet said:
    It's here!!

    huh???

  • DrippyFaucetDrippyFaucet

    Made you look

  • MeLoXtraMeLoXtra

    is it finally here..... walking to grab ipad brb............

  • MeLoXtraMeLoXtra

    FFFUUUUUCCCKKKKK

  • RajahPRajahP

    Strange.... Got me thinking that my own 'conspiracy theory' that Apple may have bought Intua is a possibility...

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2025