Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

brexit

13

Comments

  • @supadom said:

    @CrazySynthMan said:

    @Max23 said:

    just watch the brits dancing harder to the American whip, lol 😈

    The American-UK alliance has always been strong, and I can see us in the future sometime fighting together against the EU army that they're hoping and dreaming of creating.

    We will just have to kick butt together again, as we have done in the past, and the outcome won't be too pretty for the other side. We stopped the Germans before, and if we have to stop the Germans and a few other clowns that hang out in Brussels today, if they get too rowdy and too bold, then we shall do so.

    This is why the world is how it is. Over and out. Off to Beepstreet Drambo thread. See ya!

    Wait, I'm coming with you...

  • Britain will certainly crumble if they maintain their sovereignty, only through the guiding hand of globalist bankers and multinational corporation can they be shown the true path of righteousness, the news has assured me of this.

  • edited March 2019
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @1nsomniak said:
    Britain will certainly crumble if they maintain their sovereignty, only through the guiding hand of globalist bankers and multinational corporation can they be shown the true path of righteousness, the news has assured me of this.

    The news also assured me that some crazy woman was going to be elected Prez of the USA. :)

    There is so much fake news being peddled every single minute of every day now, that much of the mainstream media has less than zero credibility at this point.

  • ALBALB
    edited March 2019

    >

    We will just have to kick butt together again, as we have done in the past, and the outcome won't be too pretty for the other side. We stopped the Germans before, and if we have to stop the Germans and a few other clowns that hang out in Brussels today, if they get too rowdy and too bold, then we shall do so.

    No, the Russians stopped Germany. The US helped,/contributed, but without decisive and bloody Russian victories, we would be living under the swastika. I dare say that such an alliance today might be unlikely. No comment from me on Brexit - as a yank, it’s not my place on this forum. Lots of others here who this is directly impacting.

  • @CrazySynthMan the content of your post seems to agree with me but it’s phrased like a counter argument 🤷‍♂️

  • @ALB said:

    >

    We will just have to kick butt together again, as we have done in the past, and the outcome won't be too pretty for the other side. We stopped the Germans before, and if we have to stop the Germans and a few other clowns that hang out in Brussels today, if they get too rowdy and too bold, then we shall do so.

    No, the Russians stopped Germany. The US helped,/contributed, but without decisive and bloody Russian victories, we would be living under the swastika. I dare say that such an alliance today might be unlikely. No comment from me on Brexit - as a yank, it’s not my place on this forum. Lots of others here who this is directly effecting.

    I was going to say the same thing about the Russians actually defeating the Germans.

  • @1nsomniak said:
    @CrazySynthMan the content of your post seems to agree with me but it’s phrased like a counter argument 🤷‍♂️

    It was perhaps oddly worded or phrased on my part, but I agree with your post and wasn't trying to make any counter-argument.

  • edited March 2019

    @1nsomniak said:
    Britain will certainly crumble if they maintain their sovereignty, only through the guiding hand of globalist bankers and multinational corporation can they be shown the true path of righteousness, the news has assured me of this.

    What??? You mean you haven't drunk the globalist Kool Aid like the oh so woke Max23? The Kool Aid that says these handful of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats can do something that hasn't worked in the world's entire history, which is merge various cultures with deep rooted differences into one? Come on man, drink up!

  • Unsubscribe.

  • I would be down with brexit but it’s not AU so I think it’s a hard pass from me

  • @ALB said:

    No, the Russians stopped Germany. The US helped,/contributed, but without decisive and bloody Russian victories, we would be living under the swastika. I dare say that such an alliance today might be unlikely. No comment from me on Brexit - as a yank, it’s not my place on this forum. Lots of others here who this is directly impacting.

    The Russians certainly did their part on the Eastern front, I agree with that of course. They had no choice I guess, as they were fighting for their homeland.

    Without the Russian victories, then Russia would certainly be living under the Swastika for sure, that I can agree with. I'm not sure what you mean by us though. The USA would have still been fine.

  • edited March 2019

    @Max23 said:
    fighting immigrants at the Mexican border
    what happened to the land of the free? :o

    No country is perfect, but the USA is still far more free than most places in Europe for example. In the totalitarian UK, you had better watch out what you write on Facebook or twitter, because you just might get a visit from the thought police. Orwell would probably be turning in his grave, if he saw what was happening.

    As for fighting immigrants at the Mexican border, people and criminals who attempt to illegally penetrate the borders and enter a country which they have no legal right to enter are not immigrants by any definition of the term.

    Any modern, civilized country has proper border security and a legal, proper way for any immigrants to legally enter. Any persons attempting to illegally circumvent this process are illegal alien criminals.

  • @CrazySynthMan said:

    @ALB said:

    No, the Russians stopped Germany. The US helped,/contributed, but without decisive and bloody Russian victories, we would be living under the swastika. I dare say that such an alliance today might be unlikely. No comment from me on Brexit - as a yank, it’s not my place on this forum. Lots of others here who this is directly impacting.

    The Russians certainly did their part on the Eastern front, I agree with that of course. They had no choice I guess, as they were fighting for their homeland.

    Without the Russian victories, then Russia would certainly be living under the Swastika for sure, that I can agree with. I'm not sure what you mean by us though. The USA would have still been fine.

    So you think.

  • @ALB said:

    So you think.

    Yes, it's a sort of "what if" scenario, and I offered my opinion. Others may have a differing opinion, but there's no way of proving anything, unless we had a time machine and could go back and test out different theories and see different outcomes.

  • @purpan2 said:
    I loved the report of the French politician who called her cat Brexit, because it miaows to be let out, but when she opens the door it just sits there....

    I saw that one! Funny! :wink:

  • edited March 2019

    @CrazySynthMan said:

    @Max23 said:

    just watch the brits dancing harder to the American whip, lol 😈

    The American-UK alliance has always been strong, and I can see us in the future sometime fighting together against the EU army that they're hoping and dreaming of creating.

    We will just have to kick butt together again, as we have done in the past, and the outcome won't be too pretty for the other side. We stopped the Germans before, and if we have to stop the Germans and a few other clowns that hang out in Brussels today, if they get too rowdy and too bold, then we shall do so.

    I'm from the United States of America. We've got our own big problems here, so I'm not judging any of my European brothers about their choices. I just want to make a quick comment that @CrazySynthMan does not speak for all of us yanks. :neutral:

  • @Audiojunkie said:
    I just want to make a quick comment that @CrazySynthMan does not speak for all of us yanks. :neutral:

    Your comment seems unnecessary, as I have never claimed to speak for "all of us yanks". I speak only for myself, and my opinions are my own. That goes without saying.

  • edited March 2019
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • @Max23 said:

    US politics are really new speak, 20.000 refuges are declared as criminals. lol
    So little refugees Im laughing my ass off, my hometown has more refugees from syria.

    An illegal alien is still an illegal alien, the definition doesn't change if there's one of them or a million of them.

    Also, to gain refugee status, one must enter through proper channels and qualify as a refugee. Illegal border crossers in the USA are not refugees.

    As for your hometown, I believe I read somewhere else in this thread that you were in Germany (if I recall correctly), then your wonderful miss Merkel invited the entire world to basically come, so you have my condolences.

  • Have a good one, peeps.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • edited March 2019

    @Max23 said:

    an refugee is a refugee, if you add illegal to it doesnt change the fact that its a refugee, no matter how hard you twist words.
    I dont mind the refugees. I like to be free, so do they.

    That's not factually correct.

    If I decide to call myself a refugee, that doesn't automatically make me a refugee.

    In the USA, anybody entering as a refugee must do so through proper, legal channels and they must qualify as a refugee, to actually be classified as a refugee. Illegally crossing a border does not make somebody a refugee. The law is on my side.

    If I call myself the King of England, that doesn't make me the King of England.

    I'm sure that there are plenty of people walking around in mental institutions, insisting that they're Jesus or Elvis. That doesn't mean that these people actually are what they claim to be.

  • @Max23 said:

    @CrazySynthMan said:

    @Max23 said:

    US politics are really new speak, 20.000 refuges are declared as criminals. lol
    So little refugees Im laughing my ass off, my hometown has more refugees from syria.

    An illegal alien is still an illegal alien, the definition doesn't change if there's one of them or a million of them.

    Also, to gain refugee status, one must enter through proper channels and qualify as a refugee. Illegal border crossers in the USA are not refugees.

    As for your hometown, I believe I read somewhere else in this thread that you were in Germany (if I recall correctly), then your wonderful miss Merkel invited the entire world to basically come, so you have my condolences.

    an refugee is a refugee, if you add illegal to it doesnt change the fact that its a refugee, no matter how hard you twist words.
    I dont mind the refugees. I like to be free, so do they.

    OK, but an illegal border crossing is an illegal border crossing, adding "refugee" to it doesn't make it legal either ;)

  • @CrazySynthMan said:

    @ALB said:

    So you think.

    Yes, it's a sort of "what if" scenario, and I offered my opinion. Others may have a differing opinion, but there's no way of proving anything, unless we had a time machine and could go back and test out different theories and see different outcomes.

    Yes, all just speculation, but an axis-dominated planet is not one that I would care to live in. Makes me think of Man in the High Castle.

  • @ALB said:

    Yes, all just speculation, but an axis-dominated planet is not one that I would care to live in. Makes me think of Man in the High Castle.

    I wouldn't like to live on an axis-dominated planet either. Doesn't sound like much fun. :)

    The USA was of course lucky to have the geographical advantage, in that we were so far away and isolated from where the trouble was taking place. But, yes, it's all speculation of course.

    I have Amazon, and I've seen the Man in the High Castle. I liked the first season, but I feel that the show began to taper off after that, in my opinion.

  • @CrazySynthMan said:

    @Max23 said:

    an refugee is a refugee, if you add illegal to it doesnt change the fact that its a refugee, no matter how hard you twist words.
    I dont mind the refugees. I like to be free, so do they.

    That's not factually correct.

    If I decide to call myself a refugee, that doesn't automatically make me a refugee.

    In the USA, anybody entering as a refugee must do so through proper, legal channels and they must qualify as a refugee, to actually be classified as a refugee. Illegally crossing a border does not make somebody a refugee. The law is on my side.

    If I call myself the King of England, that doesn't make me the King of England.

    I'm sure that there are plenty of people walking around in mental institutions, insisting that they're Jesus or Elvis. That doesn't mean that these people actually are what they claim to be.

    The only way to apply for asylum is at the border. These refugees, fleeing violence in Central America, are following protocol. You present yourself at the border and ask to be considered a refugee.
    Show some compassion.

  • @ExAsperis99 said:

    The only way to apply for asylum is at the border. These refugees, fleeing violence in Central America, are following protocol. You present yourself at the border and ask to be considered a refugee.
    Show some compassion.

    Yes, the proper way is to apply for asylum at a border checkpoint, not to sneak their way illegally in, bypassing those border checkpoints or proper entry ways, which is what many do. That is not following protocol, and I have no compassion for such types.

  • @supadom said:

    @studs1966 said:

    @d4d0ug said:
    Speaking as a very disgruntled Brit. It’s a complete and utter cluster-f@#k. Please try and remember practically half the UK voted to stay.

    Which half would that be?.... Poland?... :D
    The other half is here with me in Cyprus, some in France & Spain/Portugal, ect.. . They left the UK because of what’s going on in UK... Still, out of it, when I was in the UK, I managed to learn a bit of Russian & Polish, on the construction site (as I’m a Bench Joiner/Carpenter back then)... Its not all bad.. Now I’m learning Greek... :D

    I don’t believe polish nationals were voting mate. I do get the joke though. Enjoy Greece.

    Actually, I made some good friends with the Polish guys.. When I was working with them... They are hardworking people..

  • @CrazySynthMan said:

    @ExAsperis99 said:

    The only way to apply for asylum is at the border. These refugees, fleeing violence in Central America, are following protocol. You present yourself at the border and ask to be considered a refugee.
    Show some compassion.

    Yes, the proper way is to apply for asylum at a border checkpoint, not to sneak their way illegally in, bypassing those border checkpoints or proper entry ways, which is what many do. That is not following protocol, and I have no compassion for such types.

    Many do NOT do that. That's a cable TV canard. You remember the scary "migrant caravan" that the Trump Administration and Fox News pounded on relentlessly right before the midterms? Those people were marching to present themselves at the border and apply for refugee status. (And was anyone surprised that after the Republicans were slaughtered in the election the 24-hour migrant caravan coverage vanished?)

This discussion has been closed.