Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

Looking for an alternative: Which DAW has a similar workflow to Cubasis?

13»

Comments

  • Made my first track in NS2. I dig it, and there are definitely some benefits over CB3. But I do still like CB3 the most.

  • @JohnnyGoodyear said:

    @anickt said:

    @mojozart said:
    MIDI or audio workflow?

    For audio, I use Auria. Though I'm pulling for cross-platform Zenbeats.

    There's still no support for audio tracks in NS2, right?

    I find myself in ZB more and more. MIDI/piano roll is not too much different than NS2 once you get used to where everything is and it’s got audio tracks that timestretch. I’ve been doing a lot of sample based, hip hop-ish kind of stuff for a rapper I know and it’s been working well.

    This is encouraging to hear...

    I hated ZB the first few times I tried it...

  • @anickt said:

    @JohnnyGoodyear said:

    @anickt said:

    @mojozart said:
    MIDI or audio workflow?

    For audio, I use Auria. Though I'm pulling for cross-platform Zenbeats.

    There's still no support for audio tracks in NS2, right?

    I find myself in ZB more and more. MIDI/piano roll is not too much different than NS2 once you get used to where everything is and it’s got audio tracks that timestretch. I’ve been doing a lot of sample based, hip hop-ish kind of stuff for a rapper I know and it’s been working well.

    This is encouraging to hear...

    I hated ZB the first few times I tried it...

    Mrs G. says the same of me. True story.

  • edited April 2020

    As others have said .. you'd prob be most comfortable going back to Cubasis 2 . or BM3 ...getting to know it is worth it.

    @Telstar5 said:
    Where’s the BM3 book, BTW?

    @JohnnyGoodyear

    AND the BM3 book from @tk32 is coming. SOON.

  • @BitterGums said:
    As others have said .. you'd prob be most comfortable going back to Cubasis 2 .

    That's what I am going to do. I like Cubasis 3 in every aspect of its design, but it is just too unreliable. C2 has some limitations compared to C3, but it is way more stable.

  • edited April 2020

    @LeonKowalski Yeah, good choice. I'm finally comfortable in C2. And as you said it's stable ..which is worth it's weight in gold. When 3 was on sale I really wanted to make the jump but read too many posts about instability and bugs. The added buses, mixer scaling, etc didn't sell it for me. I'll wait 'til they have it fixed up a bit. Which will happen.. as evidenced in these posts Lars is ON IT.

  • @BitterGums said:
    @LeonKowalski Yeah, good choice. I'm finally comfortable in C2. And as you said it's stable ..which is worth it's weight in gold. When 3 was on sale I really wanted to make the jump but read too many posts about instability and bugs. The added buses, mixer scaling, etc didn't sell it for me. I'll wait 'til they have it fixed up a bit. Which will happen.. as evidenced in these posts Lars is ON IT.

    Same. I got Cubasis 2 via the LE unlock because of stability. I don't need to be at the bleeding edge of technology. I value stability a lot more. Plus I can always test Cubasis 3-LE if I ever get curious. For free.

  • @god said:

    1. AUv3 automation is on the events and not tracks, meaning if you move parts around the project, you don't need to manually move all automations around

    That's a killer feature. Any other iOS DAW caught up with that?

  • edited February 2022

    I don't have a ton to add that hasn't been said, but I will vouch that Nanostudio 2 is amazing workflow and stability wise. For me it has been the most stable environment second only to gadget, beating out even aum sometimes.

    I highly recommend, create song parts or chunks in Nanostudio 2, mix them, then export them as audio files into cubasis 2 or 3. If all the auv3 and effects and automation etc. are done in Nanostudio, it will be a pleasure to work with, then you can work purely in audio with cubasis. Audio has a much much lower CPU footprint than live plugins, and is much, much less likely to crash and burn. Just arrange the song parts as wavs in cubasis.

    If you really need to chop and manipulate sample loops with time stretch stretch and effects, koala is wonderful, assuming you don't need deep granular.

    So basically: plugins, composition and mix in Nanostudio for workflow and stability. Stem out to audio (I usually just stem master tracks after mixing, not multitracks) and plop them in cubasis.

    I would still keep AUM handy if you love using generative midi auv3s, and you can export those wavs into cubasis, but Nanostudio is capable of using those, albeit more clunky routing than aum.

    If you only work with audio, no plugins except a limiter and eq, you might run into way less problems in cubasis without having to ditch it.

  • So weird, i find CB3 way more stable for me than CB2. I think the secret is finding what works best as far as stability in the settings pages of CB3. Enable this, disable that. Just see what works best for your iPad. I even recorded lots of tracks on my iPhone 6s plus! I was amazed how stable it was. Just made sure inset the settings from tablet to iPhone in CB3.

Sign In or Register to comment.