Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro?Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

AUM for Mac?

1235»

Comments

  • @SevenSystems said:

    @tja said:

    @reezygle said:
    @SevenSystems let me start with thanking you for creating AUM. It’s a stable and indispensable app!

    Psssttttt ... it's from @j_liljedahl

    😄 thanks for pointing it out. Obviously both AUM and Xequence were game changers in their own areas so the honor is deserved for both developers 😉

    Unintended but agreed! I was looking at both threads and got my lines crossed. 😅

  • edited January 3

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @jacou said:
    Since Logic for iPad projects seem to be somewhat compatible with Logic for Mac and vice versa I wonder if there is now a solution for the cross-platform AUv3 plugin compatibility issue @j_liljedahl

    I haven't had time to give this much more thought, but as long as the AUv3s has the same "audio component description" ID codes on both platforms, and uses the same state saving format, I don't see a reason it wouldn't be cross-platform compatible.

    I haven’t followed the entire thread but are you still planning on making a Mac version of AUM? Maybe it already works on Silicon Macs-? (I don’t have one so I don’t know.)

    If it doesn’t work on Macs, I would say that you should definitely make it - AUM is so unique that once people on Mac learn about it, they will love it. Heck, you’d probably sell a ton of copies!

    Just a few months ago on a forum thread here I read a few people commenting on iOS DAWs and they all said the same thing: Most Mac people would not be impressed with iOS DAWs….but they’d love AUM and be envious of us iOS users for having it.

  • wimwim
    edited January 3

    Only a few posts above the one you quoted...
    https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/comment/1139411/#Comment_1139411

  • @wim said:
    Only a few posts above the one you quoted...
    https://forum.audiob.us/discussion/comment/1139411/#Comment_1139411

    He said that 13 months ago.

  • wimwim
    edited January 3

    Fair enough. I misread the date. ✌🏼

  • @LeftyChris said:

    I haven’t followed the entire thread but are you still planning on making a Mac version of AUM? Maybe it already works on Silicon Macs-? (I don’t have one so I don’t know.)

    If it doesn’t work on Macs, I would say that you should definitely make it - AUM is so unique that once people on Mac learn about it, they will love it. Heck, you’d probably sell a ton of copies!

    Just a few months ago on a forum thread here I read a few people commenting on iOS DAWs and they all said the same thing: Most Mac people would not be impressed with iOS DAWs….but they’d love AUM and be envious of us iOS users for having it.

    Well, as with most of my plans the better word would be "wish" :) I have a desire to make AUM for Mac, but don't know when. Also haven't decided about universal vs separate app purchase, but leaning towards the latter.

  • @j_liljedahl said:

    @LeftyChris said:

    I haven’t followed the entire thread but are you still planning on making a Mac version of AUM? Maybe it already works on Silicon Macs-? (I don’t have one so I don’t know.)

    If it doesn’t work on Macs, I would say that you should definitely make it - AUM is so unique that once people on Mac learn about it, they will love it. Heck, you’d probably sell a ton of copies!

    Just a few months ago on a forum thread here I read a few people commenting on iOS DAWs and they all said the same thing: Most Mac people would not be impressed with iOS DAWs….but they’d love AUM and be envious of us iOS users for having it.

    Well, as with most of my plans the better word would be "wish" :) I have a desire to make AUM for Mac, but don't know when. Also haven't decided about universal vs separate app purchase, but leaning towards the latter.

    I’ll be fine if AUM never changes except for the implementation of multithreading support, it’s crucial for the functionality and effectiveness of the app. It's a real limitation at the moment.

    You can always make “AUM Next” without the constraints of the old framework used in AUM. 😅

  • @j_liljedahl said:

    @LeftyChris said:

    I haven’t followed the entire thread but are you still planning on making a Mac version of AUM? Maybe it already works on Silicon Macs-? (I don’t have one so I don’t know.)

    If it doesn’t work on Macs, I would say that you should definitely make it - AUM is so unique that once people on Mac learn about it, they will love it. Heck, you’d probably sell a ton of copies!

    Just a few months ago on a forum thread here I read a few people commenting on iOS DAWs and they all said the same thing: Most Mac people would not be impressed with iOS DAWs….but they’d love AUM and be envious of us iOS users for having it.

    Well, as with most of my plans the better word would be "wish" :) I have a desire to make AUM for Mac, but don't know when. Also haven't decided about universal vs separate app purchase, but leaning towards the latter.

    Well according to your poll, a vast majority are happy to re-buy a Mac version, so there's some income just begging to be made:)
    You could also mebbe run a crowd-funding account, people who donate above, say $25 get a copy when released....or some similar idea perhaps?

  • @pax-eterna said:

    @j_liljedahl said:

    @LeftyChris said:

    I haven’t followed the entire thread but are you still planning on making a Mac version of AUM? Maybe it already works on Silicon Macs-? (I don’t have one so I don’t know.)

    If it doesn’t work on Macs, I would say that you should definitely make it - AUM is so unique that once people on Mac learn about it, they will love it. Heck, you’d probably sell a ton of copies!

    Just a few months ago on a forum thread here I read a few people commenting on iOS DAWs and they all said the same thing: Most Mac people would not be impressed with iOS DAWs….but they’d love AUM and be envious of us iOS users for having it.

    Well, as with most of my plans the better word would be "wish" :) I have a desire to make AUM for Mac, but don't know when. Also haven't decided about universal vs separate app purchase, but leaning towards the latter.

    Well according to your poll, a vast majority are happy to re-buy a Mac version, so there's some income just begging to be made:)
    You could also mebbe run a crowd-funding account, people who donate above, say $25 get a copy when released....or some similar idea perhaps?

    Guess that wasn't such a good idea after all hahaha!

  • edited March 9

    For me, the iPad and AUM is fun precisely becauseit's not on the computer. The computer feels like work somehow (product manager at a software company). I use AUM live to run click and do synths, and I use it just for fun at home too. You're up against mainstage and the like on osx, which I'd likely use instead of AUM if I were wanting to bring a laptop on stage.

    I'll say this too: be careful making business decisions on a willingness to pay survey like this as well. We consumers will say yes all day long and then not buy it when you finally release it!

    Good luck! (And if you're looking for alternatives, a condensed mixer view would be time well spent for me!)

  • @mistercharlie said:
    What would be really great is if Apple made a portable Mac with a built-in screen, battery, keyboard and trackpad.

    And… I could put it on my lap. In fact, that’s brilliant. They could call it a… a… laptop! :smile:

  • GUBGUB
    edited March 9

    Now imagine if this “laptop” computer could fold in half like a book. They could call it a MacFold! Maybe have a MacFold Plus line of more powerful models, and a MacFold Helium line, consisting of less fully-featured, but more lightweight models.

  • edited March 9

    @shoegazedivision said:
    For me, the iPad and AUM is fun precisely becauseit's not on the computer. The computer feels like work somehow (product manager at a software company). I use AUM live to run click and do synths, and I use it just for fun at home too. You're up against mainstage and the like on osx, which I'd likely use instead of AUM if I were wanting to bring a laptop on stage.

    I'll say this too: be careful making business decisions on a willingness to pay survey like this as well. We consumers will say yes all day long and then not buy it when you finally release it!

    Good luck! (And if you're looking for alternatives, a condensed mixer view would be time well spent for me!)

    Yes AUM will always be more fun on the iPad. But in my case would be very useful on Mac as well. I use my iPad with AUM to play guitar live at church (or sometimes a shoegazy jam here and there). At home I mostly use my Mac with proper studio monitors for everything music related. So it would be immensely useful to set up my AUM sessions on my Mac and check the sound on my monitors and then take the same session with me on my iPad to play through a pa systems live.

    It’s a bit of a hassle to plug everything around so that I can use my iPad with my studio monitors at home.

    I’m quite hopeful that Jonatan will find the time necessary to do the port. Of course happy to pay for it again.

  • .......... I'll say this too: be careful making business decisions on a willingness to pay survey like this as well. We consumers will say yes all day long and then not buy it when you finally release it!

    Which is why I suggested a crowd funding scheme instead :) that way he can set a target and once reached create the product - no need to "trust" pledges - he'll have the $'s in his pocket :)

  • Yeah that's not a bad idea. Different trade offs, but maybe better ones. He's clearly got a good thing going, I'm sure he'll sort it out. Mac desktop would certainly open up a new audience and grow the business. See, haha, I can talk myself either way on his behalf.

  • @shoegazedivision said:
    Yeah that's not a bad idea. Different trade offs, but maybe better ones. He's clearly got a good thing going, I'm sure he'll sort it out. Mac desktop would certainly open up a new audience and grow the business. See, haha, I can talk myself either way on his behalf.

    B)

  • I’ll be fine if AUM never changes except for the implementation of multithreading support, it’s crucial for the functionality and effectiveness of the app. It's a real limitation at the moment.

    You can always make “AUM Next” without the constraints of the old framework used in AUM. 😅

    THIS!!!! 💯

Sign In or Register to comment.