Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.

What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.

Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.

Download on the App Store

Loopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.

New Audiokit Pro plugin on the way..

124»

Comments

  • ErrkaPettiErrkaPetti

    @Gavinski said:
    You can't... That's why people just put a full stop or whatever

    @Simon said:

    @FriedTapeworm said:
    He’s already deleted them, it seems

    Didn't know you could do that... how do you delete a message?

    Then it must have been Michael as a moderator deleting this idiotic replies…

  • GavinskiGavinski

    @ErrkaPetti said:

    @Gavinski said:
    You can't... That's why people just put a full stop or whatever

    @Simon said:

    @FriedTapeworm said:
    He’s already deleted them, it seems

    Didn't know you could do that... how do you delete a message?

    Then it must have been Michael as a moderator deleting this idiotic replies…

    Must have been. Probably got a warning too

  • gusgranitegusgranite

    @AnalogMatthew If multiple developer releases are under the single AudioKit Pro developer account then I am assuming you have control of that account as it needs to be tied to a single email?

  • NeuMNeuM

    @AnalogMatthew, please take the following advice in the spirit in which it's given. It is not meant as criticism. It is meant as a way to keep the shine on AudioKit and improve things.

    As part of the agreement between AudioKit (the organization/company) and developers who use the tools which are made available to them, there should be a legally binding agreement that a developer must maintain their software so it is up to date on all platforms it is made available on (within a reasonable development timeframe) or they lose their license to use all AudioKit provided software. Developers who fail to maintain their products, regardless of the reasons, have an unfortunate side effect of giving AudioKit a negative reputation. I think it's only fair that anyone who takes advantage of the software platform AudioKit provides them that they keep their software functioning smoothly for users. AudioKit needs to have the ability to maintain "brand" quality among the disparate community of developers out there today.

    Thanks and I really like the quality of sounds in the King of FM app. 👍

  • wimwim
    edited July 2023

    Creative idea, but no developer in their right mind would agree to such a thing.

  • NeuMNeuM
    edited July 2023

    @wim said:
    Creative idea, but no developer in their right mind would agree to such a thing.

    But developers do agree to something similar to this right now when they sign on the dotted line to use Apple's Xcode and App Store. When a developer creates an app and sells on Apple's app platform they are agreeing to a myriad of restrictions, a number of which could result in the cancellation of their account if they violate the terms, no matter if they have worked on their app for a week or a year.

    Developers who choose to take advantage of AudioKit-supplied software for their app development need to understand there is an exchange at work here. They agree to some simple requirements in order to speed their development process and take advantage of the work already done for them. It's a very reasonable trade.

    AudioKit has gotten a bad reputation for things a number of developers have done (or neglected to do) which reflect poorly on the AudioKit name and that should not be allowed to continue, in my opinion. These are easily defended requirements which, when followed, allow a clever or entrepreneurial developer to essentially make money with little downside thanks to AudioKit.

  • dendydendy
    edited July 2023

    @NeuM

    there are 2 different things

    • using audiokit framework
    • releasing apps under audiokit appstore acount

    you can use audiokit in your app and still you can release the app under your own account, and you even doesn’t need to explicitly mention you use AK. All responsibility on you. Your app released under your name.

    From what i understod, AK guys decided to release under own account some apps developed by thirtd party devs - well that was their decision and their FULL reponsibility for quality and updates of those apps. If i would be on AK side and some app made by third party dev would’t fulfill quality criteria, i would just remove it from appstore.

  • wimwim
    edited July 2023

    . deleted .

    Lost my appetite for armchair quarterbacking.

  • SimonSimon
    edited July 2023

    @wim said:
    . deleted .

    Lost my appetite for armchair quarterbacking.

    LOL!

    Yeah - it really 'aint worth it.. :smiley:

  • JeffChasteenJeffChasteen

    @wim said:
    I think a lot of the animosity that ends up being directed at you @AnalogMatthew is due to misunderstandings about Audiokit the framework vs. AudioKit (Pro) the company.

    People think that Audiokit Pro is a monolithic company publishing apps. They don't realize that apps promoted by Audiokit Pro are more often the works of independent developers using the Audiokit framework than in-house products. You, as the only face for these apps, bear the brunt of complaints - most of which are beyond your control. The 909 app is a case in point. You, and Audiokit get irreparably tarnished by something as incomprehensible as a mistimed 909 kick, when there's nothing you can do to force a fix.

    The confusion is understandable. I feel like you've always been extremely careful not to talk about this to avoid casting blame on anyone. That has got to take a real emotional toll. You have my vast admiration for staying above it as best as possible and for sticking around even when haven been unnecessarily rudely attacked.

    It's good that some of this is coming out now. I don't think it will stop the people that just want to vent and don't care about the underlying dynamics but at least it may help those who care to understand.

    Some level of separation in branding might help in the future. Just a thought.

    That’s an excellent analysis and response.
    Very nicely done.

  • GrandbearGrandbear
    edited July 2023

    First look here:

  • dendydendy

    sounds interesting, will definitely try it ..

  • SamuSamu

    @dendy said:
    sounds interesting, will definitely try it ..

    I just hope the automated knobs will not transmit AUParameter changes...
    ...and hopefully we can still manually move knobs that are modulated by the LFO.
    (imho. modulation should not move the actual knob but just indicate how much the value is adjusted, this could be a ring around the knob or something like that).

    I'm quite sure @analog_matt will drop by to say hi when this drops tomorrow :sunglasses:

  • dendydendy

    @Samu said:

    @dendy said:
    sounds interesting, will definitely try it ..

    I just hope the automated knobs will not transmit AUParameter changes...
    ...and hopefully we can still manually move knobs that are modulated by the LFO.
    (imho. modulation should not move the actual knob but just indicate how much the value is adjusted, this could be a ring around the knob or something like that).

    yes this detail makes other AK synths basically unusable as AU instruments, but AnalogMatt is aware of this problem i believe at some point he will address this...

  • SamuSamu

    @dendy said:

    yes this detail makes other AK synths basically unusable as AU instruments, but AnalogMatt is aware of this problem i believe at some point he will address this...

    King of FM works quite ok and doesn't transmit the modulated parameters which is nice and it's very easy on the CPU...
    ...since this new app also uses a new version of the frameworks I feel it'll work quite without any major issues.

    I admit I only use King of FM for the sounds being a sucker for the old-school rompler-sound :sunglasses:

    Tomorrow we'll know more.

  • MrSmileZMrSmileZ

    Hmmm after watching Dean’s video I’m tempted to use this synth…but it’s really in the realms of TB’s low end synth…so ugh.
    I will now have to go down the YouTube rabbit hole.

    Trying to find something to sit in mobile for sub lab 2 that I use on Mac.

  • AnalogMatthewAnalogMatthew

    @Samu said:

    King of FM works quite ok and doesn't transmit the modulated parameters which is nice and it's very easy on the CPU...
    ...since this new app also uses a new version of the frameworks I feel it'll work quite without any major issues.

    Thanks for letting me know. Yes, the LFOs on King of Bass work the same way as the LFOs in King of FM (although there's a lot more fine-control in King of Bass).

    I've also discussed with @dendy other features he would like to see in future AudioKit apps. And, those features might find their way into a D1 reboot (if it happens, which I certainly hope it does!) :)

Sign In or Register to comment.

© Vanilla Keystone Theme 2024