Loopy Pro: Create music, your way.
What is Loopy Pro? — Loopy Pro is a powerful, flexible, and intuitive live looper, sampler, clip launcher and DAW for iPhone and iPad. At its core, it allows you to record and layer sounds in real-time to create complex musical arrangements. But it doesn’t stop there—Loopy Pro offers advanced tools to customize your workflow, build dynamic performance setups, and create a seamless connection between instruments, effects, and external gear.
Use it for live looping, sequencing, arranging, mixing, and much more. Whether you're a live performer, a producer, or just experimenting with sound, Loopy Pro helps you take control of your creative process.
Download on the App StoreLoopy Pro is your all-in-one musical toolkit. Try it for free today.
Comments
I always read 2 & 4 star reviews first.
It can be too easy/impulsive to give an app 1 or 5 stars.
If somebody has added or removed a star, it suggests a considered review and I'm interested in reading their reasons why.
Ah, I see.
Good logic.
I think if one knows the music app you like is put out by an independent chances are there will be relatively few reviews (compared to big title games etc), and this is precisely where a few sentences can and will make a difference and therefore, even amongst the lazy (me, me, me) and irrespective of Chinese Review Farms or whatever are worth it from a moral (the right thing) and a game theory (give them support to keep developing your app) point of view.
As for the Grand Ongoing Argument (of which -Hosannah- there are so few here): Humility is always in order.
Most people lack basic reading writing skills.
Now the thread has 1000 views, just goes to show how some might enjoy good arguments online..wish we could post emoji on here..I'd pull out the sad face one..
For me I rely on thesoundtestroom and this forum before I buy. And it's different with music apps because there is a level of excitement to see what the developers come up with. Many are small with only a few people working on apps. It's like the late 70's and the 80's when home computing was new.
But I still think it is very important that we all should do our part and start writing reviews on iTunes to support the devs. There are a lot of people who use them when making a purchase. Probably more than read this forum.
Ok I put up 12 reviews of my favorites, it was a good way to mentally review and rank which apps have blown me away currently. I also updated a couple of my old reviews. I feel new and fresh!
Thank you for saying that..reminds me of another point
AppStore reviews are outreach , encourage those outside out immediate circle to dive in..
I'd just like to say that leaving a review is probably the most effective way you can support an app and help it to success. Sure it helps other users trying to weigh up whether to make a purchase, but one of the most important things is it really helps with the apps SEO (search engine optimisation), basically how high up in the rankings they are displayed when someone searches for keywords related to the app. For example, I would love for my app to rank higher on the keyword "guitar", but it is currently outranked by a whole bunch of other apps, a lot which may not be of the highest quality of even related to guitar, but are bolstered by their volume of downloads and consequently their higher volume of app store reviews. Just volume of app store reviews is enough to make the app a lot more visible on the app store. Please consider this when feeling apprehensive about writing a review because your review wont immediately show up when the next version comes out. Even a review with a couple of words will lend the same weight to an apps popularity/SEO ranking as one with a whole essay, so it doesn't take much to help! Also, if you get time we do always appreciate people refreshing their reviews for each version. You don't have to write anything more, when you press 'review' your old review will automatically be put in the text box - all you have to do is hit submit again. This helps get some reviews on the board when a new version is just released.
great points
If it's so easy to help with a review I'm in. Some Devs out there brought a lot of pleasure to my life. Thank you and review.
Added several positive reviews, including an update to Jam Maestro.
Appreciated Russ! Working on an update that will please a lot of people right now, so hopefully there'll be a new update out soon too.
Great! Looking forward to that!
The AppStore simply doesn't work anymore. The user reviews are useless if you don't know the person who is talking...,
and search is still terrible.
it used to work but now there are so many apps that it's time to come up with something new to get through that content ...
The thing about reviews on the internet is that people contributing amateur reviews generally have no real idea how to review. There are several common traits in user-generated reviews. Talking about how they waited for the product before it came. Talking about the delivery process, or talking about how it didn’t come. Talking about how they opened the door in their pyjamas and the postman handed the parcel over, then paragraphs of excruciating detail about how they undid the parcel. Talking about the unboxing. Actually doing a video of the unboxing (!?). Reviewing the product within the first day or so of ownership. Reviewing only a few of the surface attributes that are contained in the product’s own publicity or spec. Criticising almost everything that annoyed them for several paragraphs, and then ending with “but apart from all that, I loved it”. Reviewing it based too heavily on the price. Excusing poor quality or performance due to the low price. Etc.
The trouble is, an amateur reviewer can hardly be expected to spend a couple of weeks thrashing every possible use case of a product. They review too early. They only consider their own use case. They are only concerned with a tiny percentage of the products capability. They don’t follow up faults that were rectified or were operational difficulties. They don’t strongly compare it with other competing products of the same class (which in the case of expensive gear, is hardly likely that an individual will have even laid hands on alternative choices to the same level of familiarity). They are often not aware of what the class of products should or shouldn’t offer or behave like, as this is their only experience.
Obviously there are exceptions, there are some superb reviews out there by amateurs, but most are not superb. Obviously also there are exceptions in that some people do have more extensive experience of competing products, earlier and later versions, etc. particularly helped if the person works in a related shop or something. Most people don’t, though, their experience is limited to the one item they decided to buy, and maybe an older instance of one several years before.
In the case of software, things are a bit different. The cost is lower, the accumulation is higher, and the delivery is less of a talking point. But nevertheless, amateur reviews are poor quality. Not to mention the truly atrocious spelling. I feel polluted when I have to read amazon reviews, the violations to language I have to witness.
With star ratings, I believe they’re not only non-linear, but not even a continuum. However, most of the population of the world thinks it’s a five-step continuum of five stars. What on earth is the two star rating for? Okay, let’s start simpler: what is the three star for, then? Is it an average product, neither resembling your horse dying, nor winning the lottery. It’s just good, no bad surprises, nothing you didn’t already understand it was going to do, it just did what you expected. Or do we give five stars to something like that? Top maximum superb? Five stars to everything that does the job it’s supposed to? Then what was three again? What is one, then? Terrible, abysmal, disastrous, or merely not particularly good, like a three star rating is? Is four just that bit above the middle line of three, or is four some punishment for not being normal like a five? Coming back to two stars — what on earth ever gets two? What is two stars for?
I think the review system of iTunes (now back on topic) is particularly harmful, but it’s the only leverage a manufacturer has to actuate popularity. There should be something else, that isn’t an amateur attempt at reviewing (which half the time isn’t even intended to be that by the consumer, it’s more seen as a feedback form, for punishing the manufacturer, or else for warning other future consumers against being so). The requirement by the app store mechanism for some sort of active contribution back from the consumer is apparent, but reviews and stars are not an effective way to do it. I don’t really know what is, though.
It's extensive, you know.
Hate to be negative, but I only ever bother submitting a review if an app eats my work.
that's an interesting question. What do 1 and 2 star ratings mean?
1 star) doesn't do what it said it does or I do not understand how this works?
2 Stars) made me angry?
3 Stars) ok?
Yeah @lala
: zerostar?
Nah, I wanted to express that sometimes ppl just don't understand what they are talking about and talk bs. Sometimes you see reviews were overall review results are all numbers on the scale, lol - 5 stars followed by one star and so on ... And if there are a lot of positive reviews about that app, you can see that there were ppl that reviewed but didn't understand what they were looking at.
Ok, lala, were I to give a no star review, lol
If a review has polarised ratings - i.e., lots of maximum and lots of minimum stars, nothing in-between, it usually indicates that the intent of the product is not explained well enough — half the people accidentally “get it” first time and half the people have no idea how to use it first time.
„Barbie® Digital Makeover“ von Mattel, Inc.
https://appsto.re/de/8mMXG.i
^^ makes me want to vomit this girls have to be pretty stuff
learn how to do slutty makeup with Barbie and Mattel
Appstore
Stars are certainly subjective, since there is no definition offered. It's also silly that there aren't any ways to expand on it, so that you could give 2 stars for use ability, 4 stars on functionality, etc.
Careful though, the more structured and ordered and therefore complex and demanding you make it, the less anyone will be bothered to touch it at all.
Apple should pay someone for making reviews?
or some kind of management for reviews rating (like u can't edit some wikis without moderation).
Anybody can say anything doesn't work ...
it's a little like reading YouTube comments - Han shot first ^^ - makes no sense at all to read that
@u0421793 You make some good points about the accuracy of a review because you don't know the experience level of the writer. What's worse is that there are marketing firms that specialize in writing positive reviews for the App Store, Amazon, Facebook, etc.
But even so most people are not aware of that and trust the App Store reviews. I'm going to try to give some extra, more detailed information when writing an App Store review. More than just "I like this app".
It's about kindness and respect..if u like the app and respect the devs for their efforts, just saying its a cool app,and leaving a few stars is not exactly hard work is it...
We have high expectations from devs but how about showing some love beyond a few dollars purchase ?
These things help develop the iOS community further- more people buy the apps and devs get more money..then they are encouraged to make even better apps..